A Consideration of Resistance and Tolerance for Ruminant Nematode Infections
Debates on the relative merits of resistance (the ability of the host to control the parasite lifecycle) and tolerance (the net impact of infection on host performance) are often lively and unhindered by data or evidence. Resistance generally shows continuous, heritable variation but data are sparse...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Genetics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fgene.2012.00168/full |
id |
doaj-b4f86057db4f4afd8b79af70abd1df27 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b4f86057db4f4afd8b79af70abd1df272020-11-24T22:31:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212012-12-01310.3389/fgene.2012.0016831944A Consideration of Resistance and Tolerance for Ruminant Nematode InfectionsSteve eBishop0The Roslin Institute, University of EdinburghDebates on the relative merits of resistance (the ability of the host to control the parasite lifecycle) and tolerance (the net impact of infection on host performance) are often lively and unhindered by data or evidence. Resistance generally shows continuous, heritable variation but data are sparser for tolerance, the utility of which will depend upon the disease prevalence. Prevalence is a function of group mean resistance and infection pressure, which itself is influenced by mean resistance. Tolerance will have most value for endemic diseases with a high prevalence, but will be of little value for low prevalence diseases. The conditionality of tolerance on infection status, and hence resistance, makes it difficult to estimate independently of resistance.Tolerance is potentially tractable for nematode infections, as the prevalence of infection is ca. 100% in animals grazing infected pasture, and infection level can be quantified by faecal egg count (FEC). Whilst individual animal phenotypes for tolerance are difficult to estimate, breeding values are estimable if related animals graze pastures of different contamination levels. Selection for resistance, i.e. FEC, provides both direct and indirect benefits from ever decreased pasture contamination and hence decreased infectious challenge. Modelling and experimental studies have shown that such reductions in pasture contamination may lead to substantially increased performance.It is proposed that selection goals addressing nematode infections should include both resistance and performance under challenging conditions. However, there may be benefits from exploiting large datasets in which sires are used across cohorts differing in infection level, to further explore tolerance. This may help to customise breeding objectives, with tolerance given greater weight in heavily parasitized environments.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fgene.2012.00168/fullEpidemiologySheepanimal geneticsresilienceworms |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Steve eBishop |
spellingShingle |
Steve eBishop A Consideration of Resistance and Tolerance for Ruminant Nematode Infections Frontiers in Genetics Epidemiology Sheep animal genetics resilience worms |
author_facet |
Steve eBishop |
author_sort |
Steve eBishop |
title |
A Consideration of Resistance and Tolerance for Ruminant Nematode Infections |
title_short |
A Consideration of Resistance and Tolerance for Ruminant Nematode Infections |
title_full |
A Consideration of Resistance and Tolerance for Ruminant Nematode Infections |
title_fullStr |
A Consideration of Resistance and Tolerance for Ruminant Nematode Infections |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Consideration of Resistance and Tolerance for Ruminant Nematode Infections |
title_sort |
consideration of resistance and tolerance for ruminant nematode infections |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Genetics |
issn |
1664-8021 |
publishDate |
2012-12-01 |
description |
Debates on the relative merits of resistance (the ability of the host to control the parasite lifecycle) and tolerance (the net impact of infection on host performance) are often lively and unhindered by data or evidence. Resistance generally shows continuous, heritable variation but data are sparser for tolerance, the utility of which will depend upon the disease prevalence. Prevalence is a function of group mean resistance and infection pressure, which itself is influenced by mean resistance. Tolerance will have most value for endemic diseases with a high prevalence, but will be of little value for low prevalence diseases. The conditionality of tolerance on infection status, and hence resistance, makes it difficult to estimate independently of resistance.Tolerance is potentially tractable for nematode infections, as the prevalence of infection is ca. 100% in animals grazing infected pasture, and infection level can be quantified by faecal egg count (FEC). Whilst individual animal phenotypes for tolerance are difficult to estimate, breeding values are estimable if related animals graze pastures of different contamination levels. Selection for resistance, i.e. FEC, provides both direct and indirect benefits from ever decreased pasture contamination and hence decreased infectious challenge. Modelling and experimental studies have shown that such reductions in pasture contamination may lead to substantially increased performance.It is proposed that selection goals addressing nematode infections should include both resistance and performance under challenging conditions. However, there may be benefits from exploiting large datasets in which sires are used across cohorts differing in infection level, to further explore tolerance. This may help to customise breeding objectives, with tolerance given greater weight in heavily parasitized environments. |
topic |
Epidemiology Sheep animal genetics resilience worms |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fgene.2012.00168/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT steveebishop aconsiderationofresistanceandtoleranceforruminantnematodeinfections AT steveebishop considerationofresistanceandtoleranceforruminantnematodeinfections |
_version_ |
1725736778112958464 |