Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy

ABSTRACT Objective: Since its first report, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung lobectomy was carried out with the use of conventional surgical instruments, used in laparoscopy and open thoracotomy. These instruments are expensive, not standardized and there are a variety of models and man...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LEONARDO CESAR SILVA OLIVEIRA, JOSUE VIANA CASTRO
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
Series:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100164&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-b4f7599c70a64125aaf58692b96756c9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b4f7599c70a64125aaf58692b96756c92020-11-25T02:53:04ZengColégio Brasileiro de CirurgiõesRevista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões0100-69911809-45464710.1590/0100-6991e-20202435S0100-69912020000100164Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomyLEONARDO CESAR SILVA OLIVEIRAJOSUE VIANA CASTROABSTRACT Objective: Since its first report, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung lobectomy was carried out with the use of conventional surgical instruments, used in laparoscopy and open thoracotomy. These instruments are expensive, not standardized and there are a variety of models and manufacturers. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the use of these instruments on the experimental pulmonary lobectomy. Methods: We used a modified surgical simulator that uses a porcine heart-lung block filled with tomato sauce, and tested specific (Group 1) and regular (Group 2) instruments. Each group includes 15 experiments. Results: The median total time, excluding the time spent to correct the lesions, was 45.08 and 45.81 minutes, respectively in Group 1 and Group 2. There was no statistical difference between the total times (p=0.58). The only statistically different was seen for partial times regarding the elapsed time to cut and suture of lung fissures (p=0.03 and 0.04, respectively). There were more direct lesions and indirect leaks in Group 2, but without statistical significance (p=1.000 and p=0.203, respectively). The mean time spent for the diagnosis and correction of these events was 1.77 minutes with a standard deviation of 1.18 for Group 1 and 2.72 ± 1.11 minutes for Group 2 (p=0.044). Conclusion: The use of minimally invasive instruments is not associated with time improvement spent with experimental video-assisted lung lobectomy and does not lead to a faster or safer surgery. The use of VATS instruments makes correction of adverse events faster when they occur.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100164&lng=en&tlng=enthoracic surgery, video-assistedsurgical instrumentsperformance tests
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author LEONARDO CESAR SILVA OLIVEIRA
JOSUE VIANA CASTRO
spellingShingle LEONARDO CESAR SILVA OLIVEIRA
JOSUE VIANA CASTRO
Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
thoracic surgery, video-assisted
surgical instruments
performance tests
author_facet LEONARDO CESAR SILVA OLIVEIRA
JOSUE VIANA CASTRO
author_sort LEONARDO CESAR SILVA OLIVEIRA
title Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
title_short Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
title_full Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
title_fullStr Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
title_full_unstemmed Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
title_sort thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
series Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
issn 0100-6991
1809-4546
description ABSTRACT Objective: Since its first report, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung lobectomy was carried out with the use of conventional surgical instruments, used in laparoscopy and open thoracotomy. These instruments are expensive, not standardized and there are a variety of models and manufacturers. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the use of these instruments on the experimental pulmonary lobectomy. Methods: We used a modified surgical simulator that uses a porcine heart-lung block filled with tomato sauce, and tested specific (Group 1) and regular (Group 2) instruments. Each group includes 15 experiments. Results: The median total time, excluding the time spent to correct the lesions, was 45.08 and 45.81 minutes, respectively in Group 1 and Group 2. There was no statistical difference between the total times (p=0.58). The only statistically different was seen for partial times regarding the elapsed time to cut and suture of lung fissures (p=0.03 and 0.04, respectively). There were more direct lesions and indirect leaks in Group 2, but without statistical significance (p=1.000 and p=0.203, respectively). The mean time spent for the diagnosis and correction of these events was 1.77 minutes with a standard deviation of 1.18 for Group 1 and 2.72 ± 1.11 minutes for Group 2 (p=0.044). Conclusion: The use of minimally invasive instruments is not associated with time improvement spent with experimental video-assisted lung lobectomy and does not lead to a faster or safer surgery. The use of VATS instruments makes correction of adverse events faster when they occur.
topic thoracic surgery, video-assisted
surgical instruments
performance tests
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100164&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardocesarsilvaoliveira thoracoscopicinstrumentsdonotinterfereintheoutcomeofuncomplicatedexperimentalvideoassistedpulmonarylobectomy
AT josuevianacastro thoracoscopicinstrumentsdonotinterfereintheoutcomeofuncomplicatedexperimentalvideoassistedpulmonarylobectomy
_version_ 1724726931960627200