Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations

Despite its importance for the long-term viability of populations and functioning of ecosystems, the genetic diversity of populations is seldom given explicit consideration in conservation prioritization. Research on the species–genetic diversity correlation (SGDC) suggests that species diversity wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aapo Kahilainen, Mikael Puurtinen, Janne S. Kotiaho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-12-01
Series:Global Ecology and Conservation
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989414000614
id doaj-b4ed964e1bf64f9b877eea1685a32615
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b4ed964e1bf64f9b877eea1685a326152020-11-25T00:34:42ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942014-12-012315323Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlationsAapo Kahilainen0Mikael Puurtinen1Janne S. Kotiaho2Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Finland; Corresponding author. Tel.: +358 40 8053875; fax: +358 14 617 239.Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Finland; Centre of Excellence in Biological Interactions, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. BOX 35, FinlandDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Finland; Natural History Museum, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. BOX 35 FI-40014, FinlandDespite its importance for the long-term viability of populations and functioning of ecosystems, the genetic diversity of populations is seldom given explicit consideration in conservation prioritization. Research on the species–genetic diversity correlation (SGDC) suggests that species diversity within a community and intrapopulation genetic diversity are positively correlated, due to the parallel influences of environmental characteristics (area, connectivity, and environmental heterogeneity) on both levels of diversity. A positive locality scale SGDC (i.e. α-SGDC) thus provides potential for simultaneous conservation of both species diversity within a locality and intrapopulation genetic diversity. However, caution is needed, since in some situations environmental characteristics can influence species diversity and genetic diversity differently, resulting in a negative α-SGDC. In such cases there can be a conflict between conservation of species diversity within localities and genetic diversity within populations. SGDCs provide useful information also for conservation planning, which considers compositional differences between localities, since the mechanisms behind α-SGDCs can also drive correlations between differentiation of community and genetic compositions (i.e. β-SGDCs). We suggest that emphasizing locality area and connectivity between similar localities in conservation planning best conserves both species and intrapopulation genetic diversity, and that focusing on highly complementary species richness may compromise conservation of genetic diversity. Keywords: Opinion, Review, SGDC, Conservation planning, Conservation prioritizationhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989414000614
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aapo Kahilainen
Mikael Puurtinen
Janne S. Kotiaho
spellingShingle Aapo Kahilainen
Mikael Puurtinen
Janne S. Kotiaho
Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations
Global Ecology and Conservation
author_facet Aapo Kahilainen
Mikael Puurtinen
Janne S. Kotiaho
author_sort Aapo Kahilainen
title Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations
title_short Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations
title_full Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations
title_fullStr Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations
title_full_unstemmed Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations
title_sort conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations
publisher Elsevier
series Global Ecology and Conservation
issn 2351-9894
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Despite its importance for the long-term viability of populations and functioning of ecosystems, the genetic diversity of populations is seldom given explicit consideration in conservation prioritization. Research on the species–genetic diversity correlation (SGDC) suggests that species diversity within a community and intrapopulation genetic diversity are positively correlated, due to the parallel influences of environmental characteristics (area, connectivity, and environmental heterogeneity) on both levels of diversity. A positive locality scale SGDC (i.e. α-SGDC) thus provides potential for simultaneous conservation of both species diversity within a locality and intrapopulation genetic diversity. However, caution is needed, since in some situations environmental characteristics can influence species diversity and genetic diversity differently, resulting in a negative α-SGDC. In such cases there can be a conflict between conservation of species diversity within localities and genetic diversity within populations. SGDCs provide useful information also for conservation planning, which considers compositional differences between localities, since the mechanisms behind α-SGDCs can also drive correlations between differentiation of community and genetic compositions (i.e. β-SGDCs). We suggest that emphasizing locality area and connectivity between similar localities in conservation planning best conserves both species and intrapopulation genetic diversity, and that focusing on highly complementary species richness may compromise conservation of genetic diversity. Keywords: Opinion, Review, SGDC, Conservation planning, Conservation prioritization
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989414000614
work_keys_str_mv AT aapokahilainen conservationimplicationsofspeciesgeneticdiversitycorrelations
AT mikaelpuurtinen conservationimplicationsofspeciesgeneticdiversitycorrelations
AT janneskotiaho conservationimplicationsofspeciesgeneticdiversitycorrelations
_version_ 1725312034702098432