Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations
Despite its importance for the long-term viability of populations and functioning of ecosystems, the genetic diversity of populations is seldom given explicit consideration in conservation prioritization. Research on the species–genetic diversity correlation (SGDC) suggests that species diversity wi...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Global Ecology and Conservation |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989414000614 |
id |
doaj-b4ed964e1bf64f9b877eea1685a32615 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b4ed964e1bf64f9b877eea1685a326152020-11-25T00:34:42ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942014-12-012315323Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlationsAapo Kahilainen0Mikael Puurtinen1Janne S. Kotiaho2Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Finland; Corresponding author. Tel.: +358 40 8053875; fax: +358 14 617 239.Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Finland; Centre of Excellence in Biological Interactions, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. BOX 35, FinlandDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Finland; Natural History Museum, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. BOX 35 FI-40014, FinlandDespite its importance for the long-term viability of populations and functioning of ecosystems, the genetic diversity of populations is seldom given explicit consideration in conservation prioritization. Research on the species–genetic diversity correlation (SGDC) suggests that species diversity within a community and intrapopulation genetic diversity are positively correlated, due to the parallel influences of environmental characteristics (area, connectivity, and environmental heterogeneity) on both levels of diversity. A positive locality scale SGDC (i.e. α-SGDC) thus provides potential for simultaneous conservation of both species diversity within a locality and intrapopulation genetic diversity. However, caution is needed, since in some situations environmental characteristics can influence species diversity and genetic diversity differently, resulting in a negative α-SGDC. In such cases there can be a conflict between conservation of species diversity within localities and genetic diversity within populations. SGDCs provide useful information also for conservation planning, which considers compositional differences between localities, since the mechanisms behind α-SGDCs can also drive correlations between differentiation of community and genetic compositions (i.e. β-SGDCs). We suggest that emphasizing locality area and connectivity between similar localities in conservation planning best conserves both species and intrapopulation genetic diversity, and that focusing on highly complementary species richness may compromise conservation of genetic diversity. Keywords: Opinion, Review, SGDC, Conservation planning, Conservation prioritizationhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989414000614 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aapo Kahilainen Mikael Puurtinen Janne S. Kotiaho |
spellingShingle |
Aapo Kahilainen Mikael Puurtinen Janne S. Kotiaho Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations Global Ecology and Conservation |
author_facet |
Aapo Kahilainen Mikael Puurtinen Janne S. Kotiaho |
author_sort |
Aapo Kahilainen |
title |
Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations |
title_short |
Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations |
title_full |
Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations |
title_fullStr |
Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations |
title_sort |
conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Global Ecology and Conservation |
issn |
2351-9894 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
Despite its importance for the long-term viability of populations and functioning of ecosystems, the genetic diversity of populations is seldom given explicit consideration in conservation prioritization. Research on the species–genetic diversity correlation (SGDC) suggests that species diversity within a community and intrapopulation genetic diversity are positively correlated, due to the parallel influences of environmental characteristics (area, connectivity, and environmental heterogeneity) on both levels of diversity. A positive locality scale SGDC (i.e. α-SGDC) thus provides potential for simultaneous conservation of both species diversity within a locality and intrapopulation genetic diversity. However, caution is needed, since in some situations environmental characteristics can influence species diversity and genetic diversity differently, resulting in a negative α-SGDC. In such cases there can be a conflict between conservation of species diversity within localities and genetic diversity within populations. SGDCs provide useful information also for conservation planning, which considers compositional differences between localities, since the mechanisms behind α-SGDCs can also drive correlations between differentiation of community and genetic compositions (i.e. β-SGDCs). We suggest that emphasizing locality area and connectivity between similar localities in conservation planning best conserves both species and intrapopulation genetic diversity, and that focusing on highly complementary species richness may compromise conservation of genetic diversity. Keywords: Opinion, Review, SGDC, Conservation planning, Conservation prioritization |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989414000614 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aapokahilainen conservationimplicationsofspeciesgeneticdiversitycorrelations AT mikaelpuurtinen conservationimplicationsofspeciesgeneticdiversitycorrelations AT janneskotiaho conservationimplicationsofspeciesgeneticdiversitycorrelations |
_version_ |
1725312034702098432 |