DWI in characterization of complex ovarian masses, would it help?

Objective: To define the role of diffusion-weighted imaging & apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in characterizing complex ovarian masses, with particular concern to differentiating benign versus malignant masses. Materials and methods: We enrolled in this prospective study 30 patients with co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moh Salah Ibrahim Tantawy, Mohamed M. Elrakhawy, Ahmad El-Morsy, Gehad Ahmad Saleh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-09-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X18300068
id doaj-b4de0579c03f4963a5440d507ceba095
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b4de0579c03f4963a5440d507ceba0952020-11-25T01:53:43ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine0378-603X2018-09-01493878883DWI in characterization of complex ovarian masses, would it help?Moh Salah Ibrahim Tantawy0Mohamed M. Elrakhawy1Ahmad El-Morsy2Gehad Ahmad Saleh3Diagnostic & Intervention Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, EgyptDiagnostic & Intervention Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, EgyptDiagnostic & Intervention Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, EgyptCorresponding author.; Diagnostic & Intervention Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, EgyptObjective: To define the role of diffusion-weighted imaging & apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in characterizing complex ovarian masses, with particular concern to differentiating benign versus malignant masses. Materials and methods: We enrolled in this prospective study 30 patients with complex cystic ovarian masses between June 2014 and July 2015. Pelvic MRI and diffusion weighted images at b value of 0, 500, 1000 and 1500 s/mm2 at 1.5 T unit were performed for all patient. The mean ADC values were calculated for both solid & cystic component of the masses. The final diagnoses were confirmed by either pathological examination or culture of aspiration material. Results: Included masses proved benign in 17 (56%) and malignant in 13 (44%). ADC of solid component of malignant showing no statistically significant difference from that of the benign lesions, while ADC values of cystic component in malignant masses were significantly higher than those in benign masses (p < 0.05). The Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that a cutoff ADC value of 1.97 × 10−3 mm2/s may be the optimal one for differentiating between benign and malignant masses. Conclusion: The combination of DWI with ADC value measurement and conventional MRI is useful for differentiating benign and malignant ovarian masses. Keywords: MRI, Complex ovarian masses, Diffusion-weighted MRI, Apparent diffusion coefficienthttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X18300068
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Moh Salah Ibrahim Tantawy
Mohamed M. Elrakhawy
Ahmad El-Morsy
Gehad Ahmad Saleh
spellingShingle Moh Salah Ibrahim Tantawy
Mohamed M. Elrakhawy
Ahmad El-Morsy
Gehad Ahmad Saleh
DWI in characterization of complex ovarian masses, would it help?
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
author_facet Moh Salah Ibrahim Tantawy
Mohamed M. Elrakhawy
Ahmad El-Morsy
Gehad Ahmad Saleh
author_sort Moh Salah Ibrahim Tantawy
title DWI in characterization of complex ovarian masses, would it help?
title_short DWI in characterization of complex ovarian masses, would it help?
title_full DWI in characterization of complex ovarian masses, would it help?
title_fullStr DWI in characterization of complex ovarian masses, would it help?
title_full_unstemmed DWI in characterization of complex ovarian masses, would it help?
title_sort dwi in characterization of complex ovarian masses, would it help?
publisher SpringerOpen
series The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
issn 0378-603X
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Objective: To define the role of diffusion-weighted imaging & apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in characterizing complex ovarian masses, with particular concern to differentiating benign versus malignant masses. Materials and methods: We enrolled in this prospective study 30 patients with complex cystic ovarian masses between June 2014 and July 2015. Pelvic MRI and diffusion weighted images at b value of 0, 500, 1000 and 1500 s/mm2 at 1.5 T unit were performed for all patient. The mean ADC values were calculated for both solid & cystic component of the masses. The final diagnoses were confirmed by either pathological examination or culture of aspiration material. Results: Included masses proved benign in 17 (56%) and malignant in 13 (44%). ADC of solid component of malignant showing no statistically significant difference from that of the benign lesions, while ADC values of cystic component in malignant masses were significantly higher than those in benign masses (p < 0.05). The Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that a cutoff ADC value of 1.97 × 10−3 mm2/s may be the optimal one for differentiating between benign and malignant masses. Conclusion: The combination of DWI with ADC value measurement and conventional MRI is useful for differentiating benign and malignant ovarian masses. Keywords: MRI, Complex ovarian masses, Diffusion-weighted MRI, Apparent diffusion coefficient
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X18300068
work_keys_str_mv AT mohsalahibrahimtantawy dwiincharacterizationofcomplexovarianmasseswouldithelp
AT mohamedmelrakhawy dwiincharacterizationofcomplexovarianmasseswouldithelp
AT ahmadelmorsy dwiincharacterizationofcomplexovarianmasseswouldithelp
AT gehadahmadsaleh dwiincharacterizationofcomplexovarianmasseswouldithelp
_version_ 1724989432256266240