The human dimensions of a green–green-dilemma:​ Lessons learned from the wind energy — wildlife conflict in Germany

Green–green dilemmas are particularly challenging since they involve two desirable goals, yet with detrimental counter-effects. Although wind energy production is to some desirable as a form of renewable energy for reducing global CO2 emission, it conflicts with conservation goals when airborne anim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tanja M. Straka, Marcus Fritze, Christian C. Voigt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-11-01
Series:Energy Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484720306466
id doaj-b4dcf24c73c14ce5b520f397fb03b447
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b4dcf24c73c14ce5b520f397fb03b4472020-12-23T05:01:19ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472020-11-01617681777The human dimensions of a green–green-dilemma:​ Lessons learned from the wind energy — wildlife conflict in GermanyTanja M. Straka0Marcus Fritze1Christian C. Voigt2Department Evolutionary Ecology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany; Technische Universität Berlin, Institute of Ecology, Rothenburgstr. 12, 12165 Berlin, Germany; Corresponding author at: Technische Universität Berlin, Institute of Ecology, Rothenburgstr. 12, 12165 Berlin, Germany.Department Evolutionary Ecology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, GermanyDepartment Evolutionary Ecology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, GermanyGreen–green dilemmas are particularly challenging since they involve two desirable goals, yet with detrimental counter-effects. Although wind energy production is to some desirable as a form of renewable energy for reducing global CO2 emission, it conflicts with conservation goals when airborne animals die during collisions. Yet, protecting species with high collision risk may prevent to some extent the deployment of wind turbines or involve altered operation schemes with lowered energy production, two constraints impairing the development of wind energy production. Stakeholders involved in wind turbine projects discuss this dilemma not only based on their knowledge and interests, but also on their thoughts and emotions about wind turbines or affected animals such as bats. We studied some of these cognitions and emotions of stakeholders involved in the local realization of wind turbine projects (e.g. planning or authorization) to shed light on fundamental aspects of disagreements. We undertook a self-administered online survey (n=537 respondents) with six stakeholder groups from the wind energy and conservation sector to understand i) their value orientations, beliefs and emotions, the predictive potential of ii) value orientations, beliefs, emotions on trust as well as iii) trust among and in stakeholders involved in decision making processes. We observed that beliefs about the importance of wind turbines and emotions towards wind turbines differed across stakeholders while emotions towards bats were generally positive. Overall, stakeholders had low trust in each other. Representatives from the wind energy sector had more trust in politicians compared to conservationists. Trust was most strongly influenced by beliefs about the importance of wind turbines. Beliefs about the importance of wind turbines were in turn most strongly influenced by emotions towards bats and wind turbines. We argue that awareness of different beliefs and emotions among stakeholders should be acknowledged in this apparent conflict to foster trust among stakeholders.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484720306466Biodiversity conservationConflict mitigationHuman dimensionsRenewable energy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tanja M. Straka
Marcus Fritze
Christian C. Voigt
spellingShingle Tanja M. Straka
Marcus Fritze
Christian C. Voigt
The human dimensions of a green–green-dilemma:​ Lessons learned from the wind energy — wildlife conflict in Germany
Energy Reports
Biodiversity conservation
Conflict mitigation
Human dimensions
Renewable energy
author_facet Tanja M. Straka
Marcus Fritze
Christian C. Voigt
author_sort Tanja M. Straka
title The human dimensions of a green–green-dilemma:​ Lessons learned from the wind energy — wildlife conflict in Germany
title_short The human dimensions of a green–green-dilemma:​ Lessons learned from the wind energy — wildlife conflict in Germany
title_full The human dimensions of a green–green-dilemma:​ Lessons learned from the wind energy — wildlife conflict in Germany
title_fullStr The human dimensions of a green–green-dilemma:​ Lessons learned from the wind energy — wildlife conflict in Germany
title_full_unstemmed The human dimensions of a green–green-dilemma:​ Lessons learned from the wind energy — wildlife conflict in Germany
title_sort human dimensions of a green–green-dilemma:​ lessons learned from the wind energy — wildlife conflict in germany
publisher Elsevier
series Energy Reports
issn 2352-4847
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Green–green dilemmas are particularly challenging since they involve two desirable goals, yet with detrimental counter-effects. Although wind energy production is to some desirable as a form of renewable energy for reducing global CO2 emission, it conflicts with conservation goals when airborne animals die during collisions. Yet, protecting species with high collision risk may prevent to some extent the deployment of wind turbines or involve altered operation schemes with lowered energy production, two constraints impairing the development of wind energy production. Stakeholders involved in wind turbine projects discuss this dilemma not only based on their knowledge and interests, but also on their thoughts and emotions about wind turbines or affected animals such as bats. We studied some of these cognitions and emotions of stakeholders involved in the local realization of wind turbine projects (e.g. planning or authorization) to shed light on fundamental aspects of disagreements. We undertook a self-administered online survey (n=537 respondents) with six stakeholder groups from the wind energy and conservation sector to understand i) their value orientations, beliefs and emotions, the predictive potential of ii) value orientations, beliefs, emotions on trust as well as iii) trust among and in stakeholders involved in decision making processes. We observed that beliefs about the importance of wind turbines and emotions towards wind turbines differed across stakeholders while emotions towards bats were generally positive. Overall, stakeholders had low trust in each other. Representatives from the wind energy sector had more trust in politicians compared to conservationists. Trust was most strongly influenced by beliefs about the importance of wind turbines. Beliefs about the importance of wind turbines were in turn most strongly influenced by emotions towards bats and wind turbines. We argue that awareness of different beliefs and emotions among stakeholders should be acknowledged in this apparent conflict to foster trust among stakeholders.
topic Biodiversity conservation
Conflict mitigation
Human dimensions
Renewable energy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484720306466
work_keys_str_mv AT tanjamstraka thehumandimensionsofagreengreendilemmalessonslearnedfromthewindenergywildlifeconflictingermany
AT marcusfritze thehumandimensionsofagreengreendilemmalessonslearnedfromthewindenergywildlifeconflictingermany
AT christiancvoigt thehumandimensionsofagreengreendilemmalessonslearnedfromthewindenergywildlifeconflictingermany
AT tanjamstraka humandimensionsofagreengreendilemmalessonslearnedfromthewindenergywildlifeconflictingermany
AT marcusfritze humandimensionsofagreengreendilemmalessonslearnedfromthewindenergywildlifeconflictingermany
AT christiancvoigt humandimensionsofagreengreendilemmalessonslearnedfromthewindenergywildlifeconflictingermany
_version_ 1724373466824572928