Structural MRI in frontotemporal dementia: comparisons between hippocampal volumetry, tensor-based morphometry and voxel-based morphometry.
BACKGROUND: MRI is an important clinical tool for diagnosing dementia-like diseases such as Frontemporal Dementia (FTD). However there is a need to develop more accurate and standardized MRI analysis methods. OBJECTIVE: To compare FTD with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3527560?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-b4dc6c26c0fb47b1989dcbeb961398b1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b4dc6c26c0fb47b1989dcbeb961398b12020-11-25T02:36:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-01712e5253110.1371/journal.pone.0052531Structural MRI in frontotemporal dementia: comparisons between hippocampal volumetry, tensor-based morphometry and voxel-based morphometry.Miguel Ángel Muñoz-RuizPäivi HartikainenJuha KoikkalainenRobin WolzValtteri JulkunenEini NiskanenSanna-Kaisa HerukkaMiia KivipeltoRitva VanninenDaniel RueckertYawu LiuJyrki LötjönenHilkka SoininenBACKGROUND: MRI is an important clinical tool for diagnosing dementia-like diseases such as Frontemporal Dementia (FTD). However there is a need to develop more accurate and standardized MRI analysis methods. OBJECTIVE: To compare FTD with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) with three automatic MRI analysis methods - Hippocampal Volumetry (HV), Tensor-based Morphometry (TBM) and Voxel-based Morphometry (VBM), in specific regions of interest in order to determine the highest classification accuracy. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with FTD, 46 patients with AD, 26 control subjects, 16 patients with progressive MCI (PMCI) and 48 patients with stable MCI (SMCI) were examined with HV, TBM for shape change, and VBM for gray matter density. We calculated the Correct Classification Rate (CCR), sensitivity (SS) and specificity (SP) between the study groups. RESULTS: We found unequivocal results differentiating controls from FTD with HV (hippocampus left side) (CCR = 0.83; SS = 0.84; SP = 0.80), with TBM (hippocampus and amygdala (CCR = 0.80/SS = 0.71/SP = 0.94), and with VBM (all the regions studied, especially in lateral ventricle frontal horn, central part and occipital horn) (CCR = 0.87/SS = 0.81/SP = 0.96). VBM achieved the highest accuracy in differentiating AD and FTD (CCR = 0.72/SS = 0.67/SP = 0.76), particularly in lateral ventricle (frontal horn, central part and occipital horn) (CCR = 0.73), whereas TBM in superior frontal gyrus also achieved a high accuracy (CCR = 0.71/SS = 0.68/SP = 0.73). TBM resulted in low accuracy (CCR = 0.62) in the differentiation of AD from FTD using all regions of interest, with similar results for HV (CCR = 0.55). CONCLUSION: Hippocampal atrophy is present not only in AD but also in FTD. Of the methods used, VBM achieved the highest accuracy in its ability to differentiate between FTD and AD.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3527560?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Miguel Ángel Muñoz-Ruiz Päivi Hartikainen Juha Koikkalainen Robin Wolz Valtteri Julkunen Eini Niskanen Sanna-Kaisa Herukka Miia Kivipelto Ritva Vanninen Daniel Rueckert Yawu Liu Jyrki Lötjönen Hilkka Soininen |
spellingShingle |
Miguel Ángel Muñoz-Ruiz Päivi Hartikainen Juha Koikkalainen Robin Wolz Valtteri Julkunen Eini Niskanen Sanna-Kaisa Herukka Miia Kivipelto Ritva Vanninen Daniel Rueckert Yawu Liu Jyrki Lötjönen Hilkka Soininen Structural MRI in frontotemporal dementia: comparisons between hippocampal volumetry, tensor-based morphometry and voxel-based morphometry. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Miguel Ángel Muñoz-Ruiz Päivi Hartikainen Juha Koikkalainen Robin Wolz Valtteri Julkunen Eini Niskanen Sanna-Kaisa Herukka Miia Kivipelto Ritva Vanninen Daniel Rueckert Yawu Liu Jyrki Lötjönen Hilkka Soininen |
author_sort |
Miguel Ángel Muñoz-Ruiz |
title |
Structural MRI in frontotemporal dementia: comparisons between hippocampal volumetry, tensor-based morphometry and voxel-based morphometry. |
title_short |
Structural MRI in frontotemporal dementia: comparisons between hippocampal volumetry, tensor-based morphometry and voxel-based morphometry. |
title_full |
Structural MRI in frontotemporal dementia: comparisons between hippocampal volumetry, tensor-based morphometry and voxel-based morphometry. |
title_fullStr |
Structural MRI in frontotemporal dementia: comparisons between hippocampal volumetry, tensor-based morphometry and voxel-based morphometry. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Structural MRI in frontotemporal dementia: comparisons between hippocampal volumetry, tensor-based morphometry and voxel-based morphometry. |
title_sort |
structural mri in frontotemporal dementia: comparisons between hippocampal volumetry, tensor-based morphometry and voxel-based morphometry. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
BACKGROUND: MRI is an important clinical tool for diagnosing dementia-like diseases such as Frontemporal Dementia (FTD). However there is a need to develop more accurate and standardized MRI analysis methods. OBJECTIVE: To compare FTD with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) with three automatic MRI analysis methods - Hippocampal Volumetry (HV), Tensor-based Morphometry (TBM) and Voxel-based Morphometry (VBM), in specific regions of interest in order to determine the highest classification accuracy. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with FTD, 46 patients with AD, 26 control subjects, 16 patients with progressive MCI (PMCI) and 48 patients with stable MCI (SMCI) were examined with HV, TBM for shape change, and VBM for gray matter density. We calculated the Correct Classification Rate (CCR), sensitivity (SS) and specificity (SP) between the study groups. RESULTS: We found unequivocal results differentiating controls from FTD with HV (hippocampus left side) (CCR = 0.83; SS = 0.84; SP = 0.80), with TBM (hippocampus and amygdala (CCR = 0.80/SS = 0.71/SP = 0.94), and with VBM (all the regions studied, especially in lateral ventricle frontal horn, central part and occipital horn) (CCR = 0.87/SS = 0.81/SP = 0.96). VBM achieved the highest accuracy in differentiating AD and FTD (CCR = 0.72/SS = 0.67/SP = 0.76), particularly in lateral ventricle (frontal horn, central part and occipital horn) (CCR = 0.73), whereas TBM in superior frontal gyrus also achieved a high accuracy (CCR = 0.71/SS = 0.68/SP = 0.73). TBM resulted in low accuracy (CCR = 0.62) in the differentiation of AD from FTD using all regions of interest, with similar results for HV (CCR = 0.55). CONCLUSION: Hippocampal atrophy is present not only in AD but also in FTD. Of the methods used, VBM achieved the highest accuracy in its ability to differentiate between FTD and AD. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3527560?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT miguelangelmunozruiz structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry AT paivihartikainen structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry AT juhakoikkalainen structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry AT robinwolz structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry AT valtterijulkunen structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry AT eininiskanen structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry AT sannakaisaherukka structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry AT miiakivipelto structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry AT ritvavanninen structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry AT danielrueckert structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry AT yawuliu structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry AT jyrkilotjonen structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry AT hilkkasoininen structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry |
_version_ |
1724800108428525568 |