Developing a test of L2 Chinese pragmatic comprehension ability
Abstract Background This study aims to develop a test for assessing pragmatic comprehension ability in Chinese as a second language (L2). Following the framework of an argument-based approach to test validation, this study attempts to obtain backing for the Evaluation and Explanation inferences. Met...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Language Testing in Asia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40468-018-0054-7 |
id |
doaj-b4c2e3ed1ccc482f8dc6a88c06740e1c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b4c2e3ed1ccc482f8dc6a88c06740e1c2020-11-24T21:21:42ZengSpringerOpenLanguage Testing in Asia2229-04432018-02-018112310.1186/s40468-018-0054-7Developing a test of L2 Chinese pragmatic comprehension abilityShuai Li0Department of World Languages and Cultures, Georgia State UniversityAbstract Background This study aims to develop a test for assessing pragmatic comprehension ability in Chinese as a second language (L2). Following the framework of an argument-based approach to test validation, this study attempts to obtain backing for the Evaluation and Explanation inferences. Methods Test items were developed based on two sources of authentic language use (i.e., field notes and a corpus of natural language use). Following a series of piloting, 107 examinees of L2 Chinese completed the test (k = 39) in the main study. Among them, nine examinees had retrospective interviews that probed the knowledge, strategies and processes involved in completing the test. Results The assumption underlying the Evaluation inference was supported by satisfactory statistical characteristics of the test (e.g., item/test difficulty, item discrimination, distractor functioning, and item/person fit); moreover, the two assumptions associated with the Explanation inference were backed by quantitative and qualitative evidence demonstrating that variations in test performance were attributable to the targeted construct of pragmatic comprehension ability. Conclusion The test appears to be a reliable instrument for assessing pragmatic comprehension ability in L2 Chinese. The test results can be used to inform decision-making on curriculum development for interested Chinese programs.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40468-018-0054-7L2 ChinesePragmatic comprehensionImplicatureImplied meaningArgument-based approach to validation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shuai Li |
spellingShingle |
Shuai Li Developing a test of L2 Chinese pragmatic comprehension ability Language Testing in Asia L2 Chinese Pragmatic comprehension Implicature Implied meaning Argument-based approach to validation |
author_facet |
Shuai Li |
author_sort |
Shuai Li |
title |
Developing a test of L2 Chinese pragmatic comprehension ability |
title_short |
Developing a test of L2 Chinese pragmatic comprehension ability |
title_full |
Developing a test of L2 Chinese pragmatic comprehension ability |
title_fullStr |
Developing a test of L2 Chinese pragmatic comprehension ability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Developing a test of L2 Chinese pragmatic comprehension ability |
title_sort |
developing a test of l2 chinese pragmatic comprehension ability |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Language Testing in Asia |
issn |
2229-0443 |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
Abstract Background This study aims to develop a test for assessing pragmatic comprehension ability in Chinese as a second language (L2). Following the framework of an argument-based approach to test validation, this study attempts to obtain backing for the Evaluation and Explanation inferences. Methods Test items were developed based on two sources of authentic language use (i.e., field notes and a corpus of natural language use). Following a series of piloting, 107 examinees of L2 Chinese completed the test (k = 39) in the main study. Among them, nine examinees had retrospective interviews that probed the knowledge, strategies and processes involved in completing the test. Results The assumption underlying the Evaluation inference was supported by satisfactory statistical characteristics of the test (e.g., item/test difficulty, item discrimination, distractor functioning, and item/person fit); moreover, the two assumptions associated with the Explanation inference were backed by quantitative and qualitative evidence demonstrating that variations in test performance were attributable to the targeted construct of pragmatic comprehension ability. Conclusion The test appears to be a reliable instrument for assessing pragmatic comprehension ability in L2 Chinese. The test results can be used to inform decision-making on curriculum development for interested Chinese programs. |
topic |
L2 Chinese Pragmatic comprehension Implicature Implied meaning Argument-based approach to validation |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40468-018-0054-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shuaili developingatestofl2chinesepragmaticcomprehensionability |
_version_ |
1725998734730330112 |