Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests

Case law from the European Court of Human Rights has been important for the interpretation and application of the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. The decisions both give authority to and complement the Hague Convention. Two landmark cases are the Grand Chamber judgments in Neuling...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Torunn E Kvisberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget) 2019-01-01
Series:Oslo Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/02/child_abduction_cases_in_the_european_court_of_human_rights
id doaj-b49f05d934ad45a8979b38a0d678958d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b49f05d934ad45a8979b38a0d678958d2020-11-25T02:59:45ZengScandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)Oslo Law Review2387-32992019-01-0169010610.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-02-0218948693Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best InterestsTorunn E KvisbergCase law from the European Court of Human Rights has been important for the interpretation and application of the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. The decisions both give authority to and complement the Hague Convention. Two landmark cases are the Grand Chamber judgments in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland from 2010 and X v Latvia from 2013. The article analyses these two judgments, with a main focus on the Court’s application of the principle of the best interests of the child and the procedural requirements for return cases. The article also focuses on the relationship between child abduction cases and public child care cases. In case law after 2013, the Court applies the X principles in child abduction cases, while the requirements of Neulinger are still applied in public child care cases.https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/02/child_abduction_cases_in_the_european_court_of_human_rightsInternational child abductionEuropean Court of Human Rightsthe principle of the best interests of the childInternationalchildabductionEuropeanCourtofHumanRightstheprincipleofthebestinterestsofthechild
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Torunn E Kvisberg
spellingShingle Torunn E Kvisberg
Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests
Oslo Law Review
International child abduction
European Court of Human Rights
the principle of the best interests of the child
Internationalchildabduction
EuropeanCourtofHumanRights
theprincipleofthebestinterestsofthechild
author_facet Torunn E Kvisberg
author_sort Torunn E Kvisberg
title Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests
title_short Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests
title_full Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests
title_fullStr Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests
title_full_unstemmed Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests
title_sort child abduction cases in the european court of human rights – changing views on the child’s best interests
publisher Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)
series Oslo Law Review
issn 2387-3299
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Case law from the European Court of Human Rights has been important for the interpretation and application of the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. The decisions both give authority to and complement the Hague Convention. Two landmark cases are the Grand Chamber judgments in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland from 2010 and X v Latvia from 2013. The article analyses these two judgments, with a main focus on the Court’s application of the principle of the best interests of the child and the procedural requirements for return cases. The article also focuses on the relationship between child abduction cases and public child care cases. In case law after 2013, the Court applies the X principles in child abduction cases, while the requirements of Neulinger are still applied in public child care cases.
topic International child abduction
European Court of Human Rights
the principle of the best interests of the child
Internationalchildabduction
EuropeanCourtofHumanRights
theprincipleofthebestinterestsofthechild
url https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/02/child_abduction_cases_in_the_european_court_of_human_rights
work_keys_str_mv AT torunnekvisberg childabductioncasesintheeuropeancourtofhumanrightschangingviewsonthechildsbestinterests
_version_ 1724701257271083008