Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests
Case law from the European Court of Human Rights has been important for the interpretation and application of the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. The decisions both give authority to and complement the Hague Convention. Two landmark cases are the Grand Chamber judgments in Neuling...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Oslo Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/02/child_abduction_cases_in_the_european_court_of_human_rights |
id |
doaj-b49f05d934ad45a8979b38a0d678958d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b49f05d934ad45a8979b38a0d678958d2020-11-25T02:59:45ZengScandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)Oslo Law Review2387-32992019-01-0169010610.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-02-0218948693Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best InterestsTorunn E KvisbergCase law from the European Court of Human Rights has been important for the interpretation and application of the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. The decisions both give authority to and complement the Hague Convention. Two landmark cases are the Grand Chamber judgments in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland from 2010 and X v Latvia from 2013. The article analyses these two judgments, with a main focus on the Court’s application of the principle of the best interests of the child and the procedural requirements for return cases. The article also focuses on the relationship between child abduction cases and public child care cases. In case law after 2013, the Court applies the X principles in child abduction cases, while the requirements of Neulinger are still applied in public child care cases.https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/02/child_abduction_cases_in_the_european_court_of_human_rightsInternational child abductionEuropean Court of Human Rightsthe principle of the best interests of the childInternationalchildabductionEuropeanCourtofHumanRightstheprincipleofthebestinterestsofthechild |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Torunn E Kvisberg |
spellingShingle |
Torunn E Kvisberg Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests Oslo Law Review International child abduction European Court of Human Rights the principle of the best interests of the child Internationalchildabduction EuropeanCourtofHumanRights theprincipleofthebestinterestsofthechild |
author_facet |
Torunn E Kvisberg |
author_sort |
Torunn E Kvisberg |
title |
Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests |
title_short |
Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests |
title_full |
Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests |
title_fullStr |
Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests |
title_sort |
child abduction cases in the european court of human rights – changing views on the child’s best interests |
publisher |
Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget) |
series |
Oslo Law Review |
issn |
2387-3299 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Case law from the European Court of Human Rights has been important for the interpretation and application of the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. The decisions both give authority to and complement the Hague Convention. Two landmark cases are the Grand Chamber judgments in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland from 2010 and X v Latvia from 2013. The article analyses these two judgments, with a main focus on the Court’s application of the principle of the best interests of the child and the procedural requirements for return cases. The article also focuses on the relationship between child abduction cases and public child care cases. In case law after 2013, the Court applies the X principles in child abduction cases, while the requirements of Neulinger are still applied in public child care cases. |
topic |
International child abduction European Court of Human Rights the principle of the best interests of the child Internationalchildabduction EuropeanCourtofHumanRights theprincipleofthebestinterestsofthechild |
url |
https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/02/child_abduction_cases_in_the_european_court_of_human_rights |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT torunnekvisberg childabductioncasesintheeuropeancourtofhumanrightschangingviewsonthechildsbestinterests |
_version_ |
1724701257271083008 |