Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer
It is essential to know the movement of droplets in time and space (i.e. flux) when measuring and/or predicting spray drift in agricultural application. A study was performed to assess the flux measurements of a phase Doppler system against a standard monofilament system in a wind tunnel. The primar...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Polish Academy of Sciences
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Plant Protection Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jppr.2017.57.issue-3/jppr-2017-0040/jppr-2017-0040.xml?format=INT |
id |
doaj-b4660e3920444b5aa093e6fc7e49e91d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b4660e3920444b5aa093e6fc7e49e91d2020-11-25T02:57:24ZengPolish Academy of SciencesJournal of Plant Protection Research1899-007X2017-09-0157328128710.1515/jppr-2017-0040jppr-2017-0040Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometerRoten Roy L.0Post Scott L.1Werner Armin2Safa Majeed3Hewitt Andrew J.4Department of Precision Application, Lincoln Agritech Ltd., P.O. Box 69133, Lincoln, Christchurch7640, New ZealandDepartment of Precision Application, Lincoln Agritech Ltd., P.O. Box 69133, Lincoln, Christchurch7640, New ZealandDepartment of Precision Application, Lincoln Agritech Ltd., P.O. Box 69133, Lincoln, Christchurch7640, New ZealandDepartment of Commerce, Lincoln University, P.O. Box 7647, Lincoln, Christchurch7647, New ZealandSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton QLD 4343, AustraliaIt is essential to know the movement of droplets in time and space (i.e. flux) when measuring and/or predicting spray drift in agricultural application. A study was performed to assess the flux measurements of a phase Doppler system against a standard monofilament system in a wind tunnel. The primary objectives of the study were to compare flux from a new phase Doppler system against 1.7 mm cotton and 2.0 mm nylon strings at varying wind speeds (1.4, 4.2, 8.3, 12.5, and 16.7 m · s−1) and spray exposures times (5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 s) with an overarching hypothesis that the active, phase Doppler is able to accurately measure the flux regardless of exposure and spray mass whereas the static string samplers are limited to a maximum retention. The phase Doppler did measure linearly as expected, however strings did not reach a point in which they loss mass; conversely, they appeared to overload with saturation. These findings are believed to be among many variables which influence the variability of previous mass balance studies.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jppr.2017.57.issue-3/jppr-2017-0040/jppr-2017-0040.xml?format=INTflux monofilament systemphase Doppler systemwind tunnel |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Roten Roy L. Post Scott L. Werner Armin Safa Majeed Hewitt Andrew J. |
spellingShingle |
Roten Roy L. Post Scott L. Werner Armin Safa Majeed Hewitt Andrew J. Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer Journal of Plant Protection Research flux monofilament system phase Doppler system wind tunnel |
author_facet |
Roten Roy L. Post Scott L. Werner Armin Safa Majeed Hewitt Andrew J. |
author_sort |
Roten Roy L. |
title |
Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer |
title_short |
Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer |
title_full |
Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer |
title_fullStr |
Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer |
title_sort |
wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase doppler interferometer |
publisher |
Polish Academy of Sciences |
series |
Journal of Plant Protection Research |
issn |
1899-007X |
publishDate |
2017-09-01 |
description |
It is essential to know the movement of droplets in time and space (i.e. flux) when measuring and/or predicting spray drift in agricultural application. A study was performed to assess the flux measurements of a phase Doppler system against a standard monofilament system in a wind tunnel. The primary objectives of the study were to compare flux from a new phase Doppler system against 1.7 mm cotton and 2.0 mm nylon strings at varying wind speeds (1.4, 4.2, 8.3, 12.5, and 16.7 m · s−1) and spray exposures times (5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 s) with an overarching hypothesis that the active, phase Doppler is able to accurately measure the flux regardless of exposure and spray mass whereas the static string samplers are limited to a maximum retention. The phase Doppler did measure linearly as expected, however strings did not reach a point in which they loss mass; conversely, they appeared to overload with saturation. These findings are believed to be among many variables which influence the variability of previous mass balance studies. |
topic |
flux monofilament system phase Doppler system wind tunnel |
url |
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jppr.2017.57.issue-3/jppr-2017-0040/jppr-2017-0040.xml?format=INT |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rotenroyl windtunnelfluxcomparisonsusingaphasedopplerinterferometer AT postscottl windtunnelfluxcomparisonsusingaphasedopplerinterferometer AT wernerarmin windtunnelfluxcomparisonsusingaphasedopplerinterferometer AT safamajeed windtunnelfluxcomparisonsusingaphasedopplerinterferometer AT hewittandrewj windtunnelfluxcomparisonsusingaphasedopplerinterferometer |
_version_ |
1724711376263315456 |