Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer

It is essential to know the movement of droplets in time and space (i.e. flux) when measuring and/or predicting spray drift in agricultural application. A study was performed to assess the flux measurements of a phase Doppler system against a standard monofilament system in a wind tunnel. The primar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roten Roy L., Post Scott L., Werner Armin, Safa Majeed, Hewitt Andrew J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Polish Academy of Sciences 2017-09-01
Series:Journal of Plant Protection Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jppr.2017.57.issue-3/jppr-2017-0040/jppr-2017-0040.xml?format=INT
id doaj-b4660e3920444b5aa093e6fc7e49e91d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b4660e3920444b5aa093e6fc7e49e91d2020-11-25T02:57:24ZengPolish Academy of SciencesJournal of Plant Protection Research1899-007X2017-09-0157328128710.1515/jppr-2017-0040jppr-2017-0040Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometerRoten Roy L.0Post Scott L.1Werner Armin2Safa Majeed3Hewitt Andrew J.4Department of Precision Application, Lincoln Agritech Ltd., P.O. Box 69133, Lincoln, Christchurch7640, New ZealandDepartment of Precision Application, Lincoln Agritech Ltd., P.O. Box 69133, Lincoln, Christchurch7640, New ZealandDepartment of Precision Application, Lincoln Agritech Ltd., P.O. Box 69133, Lincoln, Christchurch7640, New ZealandDepartment of Commerce, Lincoln University, P.O. Box 7647, Lincoln, Christchurch7647, New ZealandSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton QLD 4343, AustraliaIt is essential to know the movement of droplets in time and space (i.e. flux) when measuring and/or predicting spray drift in agricultural application. A study was performed to assess the flux measurements of a phase Doppler system against a standard monofilament system in a wind tunnel. The primary objectives of the study were to compare flux from a new phase Doppler system against 1.7 mm cotton and 2.0 mm nylon strings at varying wind speeds (1.4, 4.2, 8.3, 12.5, and 16.7 m · s−1) and spray exposures times (5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 s) with an overarching hypothesis that the active, phase Doppler is able to accurately measure the flux regardless of exposure and spray mass whereas the static string samplers are limited to a maximum retention. The phase Doppler did measure linearly as expected, however strings did not reach a point in which they loss mass; conversely, they appeared to overload with saturation. These findings are believed to be among many variables which influence the variability of previous mass balance studies.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jppr.2017.57.issue-3/jppr-2017-0040/jppr-2017-0040.xml?format=INTflux monofilament systemphase Doppler systemwind tunnel
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roten Roy L.
Post Scott L.
Werner Armin
Safa Majeed
Hewitt Andrew J.
spellingShingle Roten Roy L.
Post Scott L.
Werner Armin
Safa Majeed
Hewitt Andrew J.
Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer
Journal of Plant Protection Research
flux monofilament system
phase Doppler system
wind tunnel
author_facet Roten Roy L.
Post Scott L.
Werner Armin
Safa Majeed
Hewitt Andrew J.
author_sort Roten Roy L.
title Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer
title_short Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer
title_full Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer
title_fullStr Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer
title_full_unstemmed Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer
title_sort wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase doppler interferometer
publisher Polish Academy of Sciences
series Journal of Plant Protection Research
issn 1899-007X
publishDate 2017-09-01
description It is essential to know the movement of droplets in time and space (i.e. flux) when measuring and/or predicting spray drift in agricultural application. A study was performed to assess the flux measurements of a phase Doppler system against a standard monofilament system in a wind tunnel. The primary objectives of the study were to compare flux from a new phase Doppler system against 1.7 mm cotton and 2.0 mm nylon strings at varying wind speeds (1.4, 4.2, 8.3, 12.5, and 16.7 m · s−1) and spray exposures times (5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 s) with an overarching hypothesis that the active, phase Doppler is able to accurately measure the flux regardless of exposure and spray mass whereas the static string samplers are limited to a maximum retention. The phase Doppler did measure linearly as expected, however strings did not reach a point in which they loss mass; conversely, they appeared to overload with saturation. These findings are believed to be among many variables which influence the variability of previous mass balance studies.
topic flux monofilament system
phase Doppler system
wind tunnel
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jppr.2017.57.issue-3/jppr-2017-0040/jppr-2017-0040.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT rotenroyl windtunnelfluxcomparisonsusingaphasedopplerinterferometer
AT postscottl windtunnelfluxcomparisonsusingaphasedopplerinterferometer
AT wernerarmin windtunnelfluxcomparisonsusingaphasedopplerinterferometer
AT safamajeed windtunnelfluxcomparisonsusingaphasedopplerinterferometer
AT hewittandrewj windtunnelfluxcomparisonsusingaphasedopplerinterferometer
_version_ 1724711376263315456