Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces”

Attempts to understand contemporary religious practice, and its associated communities and identities, must take into consideration the way that these phenomena exist in both virtual and physical spaces, as well as the way that, in some instances, religion bridges or erases this dichotomy. The appro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julian M. Murchison, Curtis D. Coats
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-08-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/6/3/988
id doaj-b4600594b08e46f18e8384a0664ec39f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b4600594b08e46f18e8384a0664ec39f2020-11-25T02:27:31ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442015-08-0163988100510.3390/rel6030988rel6030988Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces”Julian M. Murchison0Curtis D. Coats1Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Millsaps College, 1701 N. State St., Jackson, MS 39210, USADepartment of English, Millsaps College, 1701 N. State St., Jackson, MS 39210, USAAttempts to understand contemporary religious practice, and its associated communities and identities, must take into consideration the way that these phenomena exist in both virtual and physical spaces, as well as the way that, in some instances, religion bridges or erases this dichotomy. The approach here focuses on those forms of religious practice that do not fit easily into one or the other type of space. Starting with existing discussions of ethnographic methodologies for studying religious practice and the growing literature on how to study “digital religion”, we examine the methodological needs for studying “third spaces”, the hybrid, in-between spaces of religious practice. The model presented here is one of simultaneous and collaborative ethnography that extends shared methods across the virtual and the actual dimensions as the most productive approach to this type of research. Using tailored research methods and techniques within this approach offers the opportunity to consider ways in which behaviors, interactions, and speech acts that happen within this event are continuous or discontinuous with each other. It also offers insight into the dynamics of “shared experience” and how perspectives are or are not shared within these multiple dimensions.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/6/3/988multi-sited ethnographyreligious instantsthird spacessimultaneitycollaborationmethodology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julian M. Murchison
Curtis D. Coats
spellingShingle Julian M. Murchison
Curtis D. Coats
Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces”
Religions
multi-sited ethnography
religious instants
third spaces
simultaneity
collaboration
methodology
author_facet Julian M. Murchison
Curtis D. Coats
author_sort Julian M. Murchison
title Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces”
title_short Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces”
title_full Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces”
title_fullStr Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces”
title_full_unstemmed Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces”
title_sort ethnography of religious instants: multi-sited ethnography and the idea of “third spaces”
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2015-08-01
description Attempts to understand contemporary religious practice, and its associated communities and identities, must take into consideration the way that these phenomena exist in both virtual and physical spaces, as well as the way that, in some instances, religion bridges or erases this dichotomy. The approach here focuses on those forms of religious practice that do not fit easily into one or the other type of space. Starting with existing discussions of ethnographic methodologies for studying religious practice and the growing literature on how to study “digital religion”, we examine the methodological needs for studying “third spaces”, the hybrid, in-between spaces of religious practice. The model presented here is one of simultaneous and collaborative ethnography that extends shared methods across the virtual and the actual dimensions as the most productive approach to this type of research. Using tailored research methods and techniques within this approach offers the opportunity to consider ways in which behaviors, interactions, and speech acts that happen within this event are continuous or discontinuous with each other. It also offers insight into the dynamics of “shared experience” and how perspectives are or are not shared within these multiple dimensions.
topic multi-sited ethnography
religious instants
third spaces
simultaneity
collaboration
methodology
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/6/3/988
work_keys_str_mv AT julianmmurchison ethnographyofreligiousinstantsmultisitedethnographyandtheideaofthirdspaces
AT curtisdcoats ethnographyofreligiousinstantsmultisitedethnographyandtheideaofthirdspaces
_version_ 1724842641385848832