Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces”
Attempts to understand contemporary religious practice, and its associated communities and identities, must take into consideration the way that these phenomena exist in both virtual and physical spaces, as well as the way that, in some instances, religion bridges or erases this dichotomy. The appro...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-08-01
|
Series: | Religions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/6/3/988 |
id |
doaj-b4600594b08e46f18e8384a0664ec39f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b4600594b08e46f18e8384a0664ec39f2020-11-25T02:27:31ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442015-08-0163988100510.3390/rel6030988rel6030988Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces”Julian M. Murchison0Curtis D. Coats1Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Millsaps College, 1701 N. State St., Jackson, MS 39210, USADepartment of English, Millsaps College, 1701 N. State St., Jackson, MS 39210, USAAttempts to understand contemporary religious practice, and its associated communities and identities, must take into consideration the way that these phenomena exist in both virtual and physical spaces, as well as the way that, in some instances, religion bridges or erases this dichotomy. The approach here focuses on those forms of religious practice that do not fit easily into one or the other type of space. Starting with existing discussions of ethnographic methodologies for studying religious practice and the growing literature on how to study “digital religion”, we examine the methodological needs for studying “third spaces”, the hybrid, in-between spaces of religious practice. The model presented here is one of simultaneous and collaborative ethnography that extends shared methods across the virtual and the actual dimensions as the most productive approach to this type of research. Using tailored research methods and techniques within this approach offers the opportunity to consider ways in which behaviors, interactions, and speech acts that happen within this event are continuous or discontinuous with each other. It also offers insight into the dynamics of “shared experience” and how perspectives are or are not shared within these multiple dimensions.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/6/3/988multi-sited ethnographyreligious instantsthird spacessimultaneitycollaborationmethodology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Julian M. Murchison Curtis D. Coats |
spellingShingle |
Julian M. Murchison Curtis D. Coats Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces” Religions multi-sited ethnography religious instants third spaces simultaneity collaboration methodology |
author_facet |
Julian M. Murchison Curtis D. Coats |
author_sort |
Julian M. Murchison |
title |
Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces” |
title_short |
Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces” |
title_full |
Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces” |
title_fullStr |
Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces” |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces” |
title_sort |
ethnography of religious instants: multi-sited ethnography and the idea of “third spaces” |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Religions |
issn |
2077-1444 |
publishDate |
2015-08-01 |
description |
Attempts to understand contemporary religious practice, and its associated communities and identities, must take into consideration the way that these phenomena exist in both virtual and physical spaces, as well as the way that, in some instances, religion bridges or erases this dichotomy. The approach here focuses on those forms of religious practice that do not fit easily into one or the other type of space. Starting with existing discussions of ethnographic methodologies for studying religious practice and the growing literature on how to study “digital religion”, we examine the methodological needs for studying “third spaces”, the hybrid, in-between spaces of religious practice. The model presented here is one of simultaneous and collaborative ethnography that extends shared methods across the virtual and the actual dimensions as the most productive approach to this type of research. Using tailored research methods and techniques within this approach offers the opportunity to consider ways in which behaviors, interactions, and speech acts that happen within this event are continuous or discontinuous with each other. It also offers insight into the dynamics of “shared experience” and how perspectives are or are not shared within these multiple dimensions. |
topic |
multi-sited ethnography religious instants third spaces simultaneity collaboration methodology |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/6/3/988 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT julianmmurchison ethnographyofreligiousinstantsmultisitedethnographyandtheideaofthirdspaces AT curtisdcoats ethnographyofreligiousinstantsmultisitedethnographyandtheideaofthirdspaces |
_version_ |
1724842641385848832 |