Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services
Decisions in social sustainability assessment of mobility services often pose a multi-criteria decision-making issue, as trade-offs can occur between multiple alternatives and a participatory process should be used. Thus, the goal of this research is to support decision-making through determining we...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1258 |
id |
doaj-b447f18c90734b81acd282635027d0b2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b447f18c90734b81acd282635027d0b22021-01-27T00:00:30ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-01-01131258125810.3390/su13031258Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility ServicesKatharina Gompf0Marzia Traverso1Jörg Hetterich2Institute of Sustainability in Civil Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, GermanyInstitute of Sustainability in Civil Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, GermanyBMW Group, Knorrstraße 147, 80788 Munich, GermanyDecisions in social sustainability assessment of mobility services often pose a multi-criteria decision-making issue, as trade-offs can occur between multiple alternatives and a participatory process should be used. Thus, the goal of this research is to support decision-making through determining weightings for different criteria and indicators for social sustainability assessment of mobility services. For the weighting process, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method was used. A participatory analysis was chosen to identify those weightings. In total, 48 experts in the field of sustainable urban mobility were questioned from three different groups: academic institutions, city authorities, and mobility service providers in order to analyze differences and similarities between these groups. While some indicators resulted in clear prioritization, other indicators revealed large differences between the expert groups. For the majority of indicators, the weighting results were similar for all three groups of experts. Consequently, the results provide clear guidance for decision-makers in the field of sustainable urban mobility.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1258social life cycle assessment (S-LCA)analytical hierarchy processweightinguse-phasemobility services |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Katharina Gompf Marzia Traverso Jörg Hetterich |
spellingShingle |
Katharina Gompf Marzia Traverso Jörg Hetterich Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services Sustainability social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) analytical hierarchy process weighting use-phase mobility services |
author_facet |
Katharina Gompf Marzia Traverso Jörg Hetterich |
author_sort |
Katharina Gompf |
title |
Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services |
title_short |
Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services |
title_full |
Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services |
title_fullStr |
Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services |
title_full_unstemmed |
Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services |
title_sort |
using analytical hierarchy process (ahp) to introduce weights to social life cycle assessment of mobility services |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Decisions in social sustainability assessment of mobility services often pose a multi-criteria decision-making issue, as trade-offs can occur between multiple alternatives and a participatory process should be used. Thus, the goal of this research is to support decision-making through determining weightings for different criteria and indicators for social sustainability assessment of mobility services. For the weighting process, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method was used. A participatory analysis was chosen to identify those weightings. In total, 48 experts in the field of sustainable urban mobility were questioned from three different groups: academic institutions, city authorities, and mobility service providers in order to analyze differences and similarities between these groups. While some indicators resulted in clear prioritization, other indicators revealed large differences between the expert groups. For the majority of indicators, the weighting results were similar for all three groups of experts. Consequently, the results provide clear guidance for decision-makers in the field of sustainable urban mobility. |
topic |
social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) analytical hierarchy process weighting use-phase mobility services |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1258 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT katharinagompf usinganalyticalhierarchyprocessahptointroduceweightstosociallifecycleassessmentofmobilityservices AT marziatraverso usinganalyticalhierarchyprocessahptointroduceweightstosociallifecycleassessmentofmobilityservices AT jorghetterich usinganalyticalhierarchyprocessahptointroduceweightstosociallifecycleassessmentofmobilityservices |
_version_ |
1724322203805155328 |