Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services

Decisions in social sustainability assessment of mobility services often pose a multi-criteria decision-making issue, as trade-offs can occur between multiple alternatives and a participatory process should be used. Thus, the goal of this research is to support decision-making through determining we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katharina Gompf, Marzia Traverso, Jörg Hetterich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1258
id doaj-b447f18c90734b81acd282635027d0b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b447f18c90734b81acd282635027d0b22021-01-27T00:00:30ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-01-01131258125810.3390/su13031258Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility ServicesKatharina Gompf0Marzia Traverso1Jörg Hetterich2Institute of Sustainability in Civil Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, GermanyInstitute of Sustainability in Civil Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, GermanyBMW Group, Knorrstraße 147, 80788 Munich, GermanyDecisions in social sustainability assessment of mobility services often pose a multi-criteria decision-making issue, as trade-offs can occur between multiple alternatives and a participatory process should be used. Thus, the goal of this research is to support decision-making through determining weightings for different criteria and indicators for social sustainability assessment of mobility services. For the weighting process, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method was used. A participatory analysis was chosen to identify those weightings. In total, 48 experts in the field of sustainable urban mobility were questioned from three different groups: academic institutions, city authorities, and mobility service providers in order to analyze differences and similarities between these groups. While some indicators resulted in clear prioritization, other indicators revealed large differences between the expert groups. For the majority of indicators, the weighting results were similar for all three groups of experts. Consequently, the results provide clear guidance for decision-makers in the field of sustainable urban mobility.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1258social life cycle assessment (S-LCA)analytical hierarchy processweightinguse-phasemobility services
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katharina Gompf
Marzia Traverso
Jörg Hetterich
spellingShingle Katharina Gompf
Marzia Traverso
Jörg Hetterich
Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services
Sustainability
social life cycle assessment (S-LCA)
analytical hierarchy process
weighting
use-phase
mobility services
author_facet Katharina Gompf
Marzia Traverso
Jörg Hetterich
author_sort Katharina Gompf
title Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services
title_short Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services
title_full Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services
title_fullStr Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services
title_full_unstemmed Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services
title_sort using analytical hierarchy process (ahp) to introduce weights to social life cycle assessment of mobility services
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Decisions in social sustainability assessment of mobility services often pose a multi-criteria decision-making issue, as trade-offs can occur between multiple alternatives and a participatory process should be used. Thus, the goal of this research is to support decision-making through determining weightings for different criteria and indicators for social sustainability assessment of mobility services. For the weighting process, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method was used. A participatory analysis was chosen to identify those weightings. In total, 48 experts in the field of sustainable urban mobility were questioned from three different groups: academic institutions, city authorities, and mobility service providers in order to analyze differences and similarities between these groups. While some indicators resulted in clear prioritization, other indicators revealed large differences between the expert groups. For the majority of indicators, the weighting results were similar for all three groups of experts. Consequently, the results provide clear guidance for decision-makers in the field of sustainable urban mobility.
topic social life cycle assessment (S-LCA)
analytical hierarchy process
weighting
use-phase
mobility services
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1258
work_keys_str_mv AT katharinagompf usinganalyticalhierarchyprocessahptointroduceweightstosociallifecycleassessmentofmobilityservices
AT marziatraverso usinganalyticalhierarchyprocessahptointroduceweightstosociallifecycleassessmentofmobilityservices
AT jorghetterich usinganalyticalhierarchyprocessahptointroduceweightstosociallifecycleassessmentofmobilityservices
_version_ 1724322203805155328