Comparison of the methane potential obtained by anaerobic codigestion of urban solid waste and lignocellulosic biomass

The purpose of this research was to compare the methane gas (CH4) obtained through the anaerobic co-digestion between bean rind (Vicia faba) and pea rind (Pisum sativum) and the solid residues of El Macho stream of the city of Machala. For this, three 250 ml glass bioreactors were used, with the fol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H.I. Romero, C.A. Vega, J.D. Zuma, F.F. Pesantez, A.G. Camacho, F.F. Redrovan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-02-01
Series:Energy Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484719310182
id doaj-b445a2e919cb4dfd9952338c6a290abf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b445a2e919cb4dfd9952338c6a290abf2020-11-25T03:08:08ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472020-02-016776780Comparison of the methane potential obtained by anaerobic codigestion of urban solid waste and lignocellulosic biomassH.I. Romero0C.A. Vega1J.D. Zuma2F.F. Pesantez3A.G. Camacho4F.F. Redrovan5Electroanalytical Applications and Bioenergy Research Group, Chemical Engineering Department, Technical University of Machala, Av. Panamericana Km 5 1/2, Machala Postcode 070102, Ecuador; Corresponding author.Production of Biofuels Research Group, Economy Department, Technical University of Machala, Av. Panamericana Km 5 1/2, Machala Postcode 070102, EcuadorElectroanalytical Applications and Bioenergy Research Group, Chemical Engineering Department, Technical University of Machala, Av. Panamericana Km 5 1/2, Machala Postcode 070102, EcuadorElectroanalytical Applications and Bioenergy Research Group, Chemical Engineering Department, Technical University of Machala, Av. Panamericana Km 5 1/2, Machala Postcode 070102, EcuadorElectroanalytical Applications and Bioenergy Research Group, Chemical Engineering Department, Technical University of Machala, Av. Panamericana Km 5 1/2, Machala Postcode 070102, EcuadorElectroanalytical Applications and Bioenergy Research Group, Chemical Engineering Department, Technical University of Machala, Av. Panamericana Km 5 1/2, Machala Postcode 070102, EcuadorThe purpose of this research was to compare the methane gas (CH4) obtained through the anaerobic co-digestion between bean rind (Vicia faba) and pea rind (Pisum sativum) and the solid residues of El Macho stream of the city of Machala. For this, three 250 ml glass bioreactors were used, with the following composition: Reactor A (bean / sediment); Reactor B (pea / sediment); and Reactor C (bean + vetch / sediment). All bioreactors had a ratio of 1.7 between the lignocellulosic biomass (peel of bean and pea) and the RSU (sediment). A gas chromatograph was used to determine the methane concentration in the biogas obtained in the bioreactors. For the storage of the biogas, propylene bags were used. It was determined that, in Reactor A, after two weeks of anaerobic digestion, a greater concentration of methane was produced, with 39.52 ± 0.28%; compared to 10.71 ± 0.16% produced in Reactor B; and 2.11 ± 0.03% in Reactor C. A comparison analysis of means was performed, where the statistical significance (p-value <0.05) allows to conclude that the composition of the co-digested biomass does influence the production of methane gas. Keywords: Biogas, Methane, Organic sedimenthttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484719310182
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H.I. Romero
C.A. Vega
J.D. Zuma
F.F. Pesantez
A.G. Camacho
F.F. Redrovan
spellingShingle H.I. Romero
C.A. Vega
J.D. Zuma
F.F. Pesantez
A.G. Camacho
F.F. Redrovan
Comparison of the methane potential obtained by anaerobic codigestion of urban solid waste and lignocellulosic biomass
Energy Reports
author_facet H.I. Romero
C.A. Vega
J.D. Zuma
F.F. Pesantez
A.G. Camacho
F.F. Redrovan
author_sort H.I. Romero
title Comparison of the methane potential obtained by anaerobic codigestion of urban solid waste and lignocellulosic biomass
title_short Comparison of the methane potential obtained by anaerobic codigestion of urban solid waste and lignocellulosic biomass
title_full Comparison of the methane potential obtained by anaerobic codigestion of urban solid waste and lignocellulosic biomass
title_fullStr Comparison of the methane potential obtained by anaerobic codigestion of urban solid waste and lignocellulosic biomass
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the methane potential obtained by anaerobic codigestion of urban solid waste and lignocellulosic biomass
title_sort comparison of the methane potential obtained by anaerobic codigestion of urban solid waste and lignocellulosic biomass
publisher Elsevier
series Energy Reports
issn 2352-4847
publishDate 2020-02-01
description The purpose of this research was to compare the methane gas (CH4) obtained through the anaerobic co-digestion between bean rind (Vicia faba) and pea rind (Pisum sativum) and the solid residues of El Macho stream of the city of Machala. For this, three 250 ml glass bioreactors were used, with the following composition: Reactor A (bean / sediment); Reactor B (pea / sediment); and Reactor C (bean + vetch / sediment). All bioreactors had a ratio of 1.7 between the lignocellulosic biomass (peel of bean and pea) and the RSU (sediment). A gas chromatograph was used to determine the methane concentration in the biogas obtained in the bioreactors. For the storage of the biogas, propylene bags were used. It was determined that, in Reactor A, after two weeks of anaerobic digestion, a greater concentration of methane was produced, with 39.52 ± 0.28%; compared to 10.71 ± 0.16% produced in Reactor B; and 2.11 ± 0.03% in Reactor C. A comparison analysis of means was performed, where the statistical significance (p-value <0.05) allows to conclude that the composition of the co-digested biomass does influence the production of methane gas. Keywords: Biogas, Methane, Organic sediment
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484719310182
work_keys_str_mv AT hiromero comparisonofthemethanepotentialobtainedbyanaerobiccodigestionofurbansolidwasteandlignocellulosicbiomass
AT cavega comparisonofthemethanepotentialobtainedbyanaerobiccodigestionofurbansolidwasteandlignocellulosicbiomass
AT jdzuma comparisonofthemethanepotentialobtainedbyanaerobiccodigestionofurbansolidwasteandlignocellulosicbiomass
AT ffpesantez comparisonofthemethanepotentialobtainedbyanaerobiccodigestionofurbansolidwasteandlignocellulosicbiomass
AT agcamacho comparisonofthemethanepotentialobtainedbyanaerobiccodigestionofurbansolidwasteandlignocellulosicbiomass
AT ffredrovan comparisonofthemethanepotentialobtainedbyanaerobiccodigestionofurbansolidwasteandlignocellulosicbiomass
_version_ 1724667388693053440