Measuring the impact and costs of a universal group based parenting programme: protocol and implementation of a trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Sub-optimal parenting is a common risk factor for a wide range of negative health, social and educational outcomes. Most parenting programmes have been developed in the USA in the context of delinquency prevention for targeted or ind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Winstanley Sarah, Anthony Becky, Thomas Marie A, Davies Shan, Stallard Nigel, Snooks Helen A, Simkiss Douglas E, Wilson Lynsey, Stewart-Brown Sarah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-06-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/364
id doaj-b43b607fe3824f4db0c1176d75678118
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b43b607fe3824f4db0c1176d756781182020-11-25T00:15:12ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582010-06-0110136410.1186/1471-2458-10-364Measuring the impact and costs of a universal group based parenting programme: protocol and implementation of a trialWinstanley SarahAnthony BeckyThomas Marie ADavies ShanStallard NigelSnooks Helen ASimkiss Douglas EWilson LynseyStewart-Brown Sarah<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Sub-optimal parenting is a common risk factor for a wide range of negative health, social and educational outcomes. Most parenting programmes have been developed in the USA in the context of delinquency prevention for targeted or indicated groups and the main theoretical underpinning for these programmes is behaviour management. The Family Links Nurturing Programme (FLNP) focuses on family relationships as well as behaviour management and is offered on a universal basis. As a result it may be better placed to improve health and educational outcomes. Developed in the UK voluntary sector, FLNP is popular with practitioners, has impressed policy makers throughout the UK, has been found to be effective in before/after and qualitative studies, but lacks a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence base.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>A multi-centre, investigator blind, randomised controlled trial of the FLNP with a target sample of 288 south Wales families who have a child aged 2-4 yrs living in or near to Flying Start/Sure Start areas. Changes in parenting, parent child relations and parent and child wellbeing are assessed with validated measures immediately and at 6 months post intervention. Economic components include cost consequences and cost utility analyses based on parental ranking of states of quality of life. Attendance and completion rates and fidelity to the FLNP course delivery are assessed. A nested qualitative study will assess reasons for participation and non-participation and the perceived value of the programme to families. By the end of May 2010, 287 families have been recruited into the trial across four areas of south Wales. Recruitment has not met the planned timescales with barriers including professional anxiety about families entering the control arm of the trial, family concern about video and audio recording, programme facilitator concern about the recording of FLNP sessions for fidelity purposes and delays due to the new UK research governance procedures.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Whilst there are strong theoretical arguments to support universal provision of parenting programmes, few universal programmes have been subjected to randomised controlled trials. In this paper we describe a RCT protocol with quantitative and qualitative outcome measures and an economic evaluation designed to provide clear evidence with regard to effectiveness and costs. We describe challenges implementing the protocol and how we are addressing these.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13919732</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/364
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Winstanley Sarah
Anthony Becky
Thomas Marie A
Davies Shan
Stallard Nigel
Snooks Helen A
Simkiss Douglas E
Wilson Lynsey
Stewart-Brown Sarah
spellingShingle Winstanley Sarah
Anthony Becky
Thomas Marie A
Davies Shan
Stallard Nigel
Snooks Helen A
Simkiss Douglas E
Wilson Lynsey
Stewart-Brown Sarah
Measuring the impact and costs of a universal group based parenting programme: protocol and implementation of a trial
BMC Public Health
author_facet Winstanley Sarah
Anthony Becky
Thomas Marie A
Davies Shan
Stallard Nigel
Snooks Helen A
Simkiss Douglas E
Wilson Lynsey
Stewart-Brown Sarah
author_sort Winstanley Sarah
title Measuring the impact and costs of a universal group based parenting programme: protocol and implementation of a trial
title_short Measuring the impact and costs of a universal group based parenting programme: protocol and implementation of a trial
title_full Measuring the impact and costs of a universal group based parenting programme: protocol and implementation of a trial
title_fullStr Measuring the impact and costs of a universal group based parenting programme: protocol and implementation of a trial
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the impact and costs of a universal group based parenting programme: protocol and implementation of a trial
title_sort measuring the impact and costs of a universal group based parenting programme: protocol and implementation of a trial
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2010-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Sub-optimal parenting is a common risk factor for a wide range of negative health, social and educational outcomes. Most parenting programmes have been developed in the USA in the context of delinquency prevention for targeted or indicated groups and the main theoretical underpinning for these programmes is behaviour management. The Family Links Nurturing Programme (FLNP) focuses on family relationships as well as behaviour management and is offered on a universal basis. As a result it may be better placed to improve health and educational outcomes. Developed in the UK voluntary sector, FLNP is popular with practitioners, has impressed policy makers throughout the UK, has been found to be effective in before/after and qualitative studies, but lacks a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence base.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>A multi-centre, investigator blind, randomised controlled trial of the FLNP with a target sample of 288 south Wales families who have a child aged 2-4 yrs living in or near to Flying Start/Sure Start areas. Changes in parenting, parent child relations and parent and child wellbeing are assessed with validated measures immediately and at 6 months post intervention. Economic components include cost consequences and cost utility analyses based on parental ranking of states of quality of life. Attendance and completion rates and fidelity to the FLNP course delivery are assessed. A nested qualitative study will assess reasons for participation and non-participation and the perceived value of the programme to families. By the end of May 2010, 287 families have been recruited into the trial across four areas of south Wales. Recruitment has not met the planned timescales with barriers including professional anxiety about families entering the control arm of the trial, family concern about video and audio recording, programme facilitator concern about the recording of FLNP sessions for fidelity purposes and delays due to the new UK research governance procedures.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Whilst there are strong theoretical arguments to support universal provision of parenting programmes, few universal programmes have been subjected to randomised controlled trials. In this paper we describe a RCT protocol with quantitative and qualitative outcome measures and an economic evaluation designed to provide clear evidence with regard to effectiveness and costs. We describe challenges implementing the protocol and how we are addressing these.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13919732</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/364
work_keys_str_mv AT winstanleysarah measuringtheimpactandcostsofauniversalgroupbasedparentingprogrammeprotocolandimplementationofatrial
AT anthonybecky measuringtheimpactandcostsofauniversalgroupbasedparentingprogrammeprotocolandimplementationofatrial
AT thomasmariea measuringtheimpactandcostsofauniversalgroupbasedparentingprogrammeprotocolandimplementationofatrial
AT daviesshan measuringtheimpactandcostsofauniversalgroupbasedparentingprogrammeprotocolandimplementationofatrial
AT stallardnigel measuringtheimpactandcostsofauniversalgroupbasedparentingprogrammeprotocolandimplementationofatrial
AT snookshelena measuringtheimpactandcostsofauniversalgroupbasedparentingprogrammeprotocolandimplementationofatrial
AT simkissdouglase measuringtheimpactandcostsofauniversalgroupbasedparentingprogrammeprotocolandimplementationofatrial
AT wilsonlynsey measuringtheimpactandcostsofauniversalgroupbasedparentingprogrammeprotocolandimplementationofatrial
AT stewartbrownsarah measuringtheimpactandcostsofauniversalgroupbasedparentingprogrammeprotocolandimplementationofatrial
_version_ 1725388082232950784