Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8

In this article, I examine Hrabanus Maurus’ exegesis of the opening verses of 1 Maccabees, which preserves a concise account of Alexander the Great’s career. My main goal is to demonstrate how Hrabanus reinterpreted the representation of the Macedonian king from 1 Maccabees. To this end, I employ tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Djurslev Christian Thrue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2021-07-01
Series:Open Theology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0160
id doaj-b431ac60673f4fc59903c93f768ee737
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b431ac60673f4fc59903c93f768ee7372021-10-03T07:42:42ZengDe GruyterOpen Theology2300-65792021-07-017127128810.1515/opth-2020-0160Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8Djurslev Christian Thrue0Department of History and Classical Studies, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkIn this article, I examine Hrabanus Maurus’ exegesis of the opening verses of 1 Maccabees, which preserves a concise account of Alexander the Great’s career. My main goal is to demonstrate how Hrabanus reinterpreted the representation of the Macedonian king from 1 Maccabees. To this end, I employ transformation theory, which enables me to analyze the ways in which Hrabanus updated the meaning of the biblical text. I argue that Hrabanus turned the negative Maccabean narrative of Alexander into a positive representation that was attractive to contemporary readers. I support this argument by focusing on Hrabanus’ recourse to Latin sources, primarily the late antique authors Jerome, Orosius, and Justin, an epitomist of Roman history. I find that Hrabanus challenged Jerome’s interpretations, neutralized much of Orosius’ negative appraisal of Alexander, and amplified the laudatory passages of Justin, which generated a new image of the ancient king. The present article thus contributes to three fields: medieval exegesis of biblical texts, Carolingian reinterpretation of the patristic heritage, and the reception of Alexander the Great.https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0160alexander the greatbiblical scholarshipmedieval exegesis“carolingian renaissance”historiographyhistorical text reusetransformation theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Djurslev Christian Thrue
spellingShingle Djurslev Christian Thrue
Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8
Open Theology
alexander the great
biblical scholarship
medieval exegesis
“carolingian renaissance”
historiography
historical text reuse
transformation theory
author_facet Djurslev Christian Thrue
author_sort Djurslev Christian Thrue
title Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8
title_short Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8
title_full Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8
title_fullStr Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8
title_full_unstemmed Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8
title_sort hrabanus maurus’ post-patristic renovation of 1 maccabees 1:1–8
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Theology
issn 2300-6579
publishDate 2021-07-01
description In this article, I examine Hrabanus Maurus’ exegesis of the opening verses of 1 Maccabees, which preserves a concise account of Alexander the Great’s career. My main goal is to demonstrate how Hrabanus reinterpreted the representation of the Macedonian king from 1 Maccabees. To this end, I employ transformation theory, which enables me to analyze the ways in which Hrabanus updated the meaning of the biblical text. I argue that Hrabanus turned the negative Maccabean narrative of Alexander into a positive representation that was attractive to contemporary readers. I support this argument by focusing on Hrabanus’ recourse to Latin sources, primarily the late antique authors Jerome, Orosius, and Justin, an epitomist of Roman history. I find that Hrabanus challenged Jerome’s interpretations, neutralized much of Orosius’ negative appraisal of Alexander, and amplified the laudatory passages of Justin, which generated a new image of the ancient king. The present article thus contributes to three fields: medieval exegesis of biblical texts, Carolingian reinterpretation of the patristic heritage, and the reception of Alexander the Great.
topic alexander the great
biblical scholarship
medieval exegesis
“carolingian renaissance”
historiography
historical text reuse
transformation theory
url https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0160
work_keys_str_mv AT djurslevchristianthrue hrabanusmauruspostpatristicrenovationof1maccabees118
_version_ 1716845829718802432