Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8
In this article, I examine Hrabanus Maurus’ exegesis of the opening verses of 1 Maccabees, which preserves a concise account of Alexander the Great’s career. My main goal is to demonstrate how Hrabanus reinterpreted the representation of the Macedonian king from 1 Maccabees. To this end, I employ tr...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Open Theology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0160 |
id |
doaj-b431ac60673f4fc59903c93f768ee737 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b431ac60673f4fc59903c93f768ee7372021-10-03T07:42:42ZengDe GruyterOpen Theology2300-65792021-07-017127128810.1515/opth-2020-0160Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8Djurslev Christian Thrue0Department of History and Classical Studies, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkIn this article, I examine Hrabanus Maurus’ exegesis of the opening verses of 1 Maccabees, which preserves a concise account of Alexander the Great’s career. My main goal is to demonstrate how Hrabanus reinterpreted the representation of the Macedonian king from 1 Maccabees. To this end, I employ transformation theory, which enables me to analyze the ways in which Hrabanus updated the meaning of the biblical text. I argue that Hrabanus turned the negative Maccabean narrative of Alexander into a positive representation that was attractive to contemporary readers. I support this argument by focusing on Hrabanus’ recourse to Latin sources, primarily the late antique authors Jerome, Orosius, and Justin, an epitomist of Roman history. I find that Hrabanus challenged Jerome’s interpretations, neutralized much of Orosius’ negative appraisal of Alexander, and amplified the laudatory passages of Justin, which generated a new image of the ancient king. The present article thus contributes to three fields: medieval exegesis of biblical texts, Carolingian reinterpretation of the patristic heritage, and the reception of Alexander the Great.https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0160alexander the greatbiblical scholarshipmedieval exegesis“carolingian renaissance”historiographyhistorical text reusetransformation theory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Djurslev Christian Thrue |
spellingShingle |
Djurslev Christian Thrue Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8 Open Theology alexander the great biblical scholarship medieval exegesis “carolingian renaissance” historiography historical text reuse transformation theory |
author_facet |
Djurslev Christian Thrue |
author_sort |
Djurslev Christian Thrue |
title |
Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8 |
title_short |
Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8 |
title_full |
Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8 |
title_fullStr |
Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hrabanus Maurus’ Post-Patristic Renovation of 1 Maccabees 1:1–8 |
title_sort |
hrabanus maurus’ post-patristic renovation of 1 maccabees 1:1–8 |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Theology |
issn |
2300-6579 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
In this article, I examine Hrabanus Maurus’ exegesis of the opening verses of 1 Maccabees, which preserves a concise account of Alexander the Great’s career. My main goal is to demonstrate how Hrabanus reinterpreted the representation of the Macedonian king from 1 Maccabees. To this end, I employ transformation theory, which enables me to analyze the ways in which Hrabanus updated the meaning of the biblical text. I argue that Hrabanus turned the negative Maccabean narrative of Alexander into a positive representation that was attractive to contemporary readers. I support this argument by focusing on Hrabanus’ recourse to Latin sources, primarily the late antique authors Jerome, Orosius, and Justin, an epitomist of Roman history. I find that Hrabanus challenged Jerome’s interpretations, neutralized much of Orosius’ negative appraisal of Alexander, and amplified the laudatory passages of Justin, which generated a new image of the ancient king. The present article thus contributes to three fields: medieval exegesis of biblical texts, Carolingian reinterpretation of the patristic heritage, and the reception of Alexander the Great. |
topic |
alexander the great biblical scholarship medieval exegesis “carolingian renaissance” historiography historical text reuse transformation theory |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0160 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT djurslevchristianthrue hrabanusmauruspostpatristicrenovationof1maccabees118 |
_version_ |
1716845829718802432 |