Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial

Positive effects of variable practice conditions on subsequent motor memory consolidation and generalization are widely accepted and described as the contextual interference effect (CIE). However, the general benefits of CIE are low and these benefits might even depend on decreased retest performanc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Thürer, Sarah Gedemer, Anne Focke, Thorsten Stein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00165/full
id doaj-b42c42f730884c4494fa35d4a21ea24b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b42c42f730884c4494fa35d4a21ea24b2020-11-25T02:09:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612019-05-011310.3389/fnhum.2019.00165439226Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always BeneficialBenjamin Thürer0Benjamin Thürer1Sarah Gedemer2Anne Focke3Thorsten Stein4Brain Signaling Group, Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayBioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanyBioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanyBioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanyBioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanyPositive effects of variable practice conditions on subsequent motor memory consolidation and generalization are widely accepted and described as the contextual interference effect (CIE). However, the general benefits of CIE are low and these benefits might even depend on decreased retest performances in the blocked-practicing control group, caused by retroactive inhibition. The aim of this study was to investigate if CIE represents a true learning phenomenon or possibly reflects confounding effects of retroactive inhibition. We tested 48 healthy human participants adapting their reaching movements to three different force field magnitudes. Subjects practiced the force fields in either a Blocked (B), Random (R), or Constant (C) schedule. In addition, subjects of the Blocked group performed either a retest schedule that did (Blocked-Matched; BM) or did not (Blocked-Unmatched; BU) control for retroactive inhibition. Results showed that retroactive inhibition did not affect the results of the BU group much and that the Random group showed a better consolidation performance compared to both Blocked groups. However, compared to the Constant group, the Random group showed only slight benefits in its memory consolidation of the mean performance across all force field magnitudes and no benefits in absolute performance values. This indicates that CIE reflects a true motor learning phenomenon, which is independent of retroactive inhibition. However, random practice is not always beneficial over constant practice.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00165/fullmotor memory consolidationforce field adaptationsensorimotor learningmotor adaptationretrograde inhibitioncontextual interference
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Thürer
Benjamin Thürer
Sarah Gedemer
Anne Focke
Thorsten Stein
spellingShingle Benjamin Thürer
Benjamin Thürer
Sarah Gedemer
Anne Focke
Thorsten Stein
Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
motor memory consolidation
force field adaptation
sensorimotor learning
motor adaptation
retrograde inhibition
contextual interference
author_facet Benjamin Thürer
Benjamin Thürer
Sarah Gedemer
Anne Focke
Thorsten Stein
author_sort Benjamin Thürer
title Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial
title_short Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial
title_full Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial
title_fullStr Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial
title_full_unstemmed Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial
title_sort contextual interference effect is independent of retroactive inhibition but variable practice is not always beneficial
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Positive effects of variable practice conditions on subsequent motor memory consolidation and generalization are widely accepted and described as the contextual interference effect (CIE). However, the general benefits of CIE are low and these benefits might even depend on decreased retest performances in the blocked-practicing control group, caused by retroactive inhibition. The aim of this study was to investigate if CIE represents a true learning phenomenon or possibly reflects confounding effects of retroactive inhibition. We tested 48 healthy human participants adapting their reaching movements to three different force field magnitudes. Subjects practiced the force fields in either a Blocked (B), Random (R), or Constant (C) schedule. In addition, subjects of the Blocked group performed either a retest schedule that did (Blocked-Matched; BM) or did not (Blocked-Unmatched; BU) control for retroactive inhibition. Results showed that retroactive inhibition did not affect the results of the BU group much and that the Random group showed a better consolidation performance compared to both Blocked groups. However, compared to the Constant group, the Random group showed only slight benefits in its memory consolidation of the mean performance across all force field magnitudes and no benefits in absolute performance values. This indicates that CIE reflects a true motor learning phenomenon, which is independent of retroactive inhibition. However, random practice is not always beneficial over constant practice.
topic motor memory consolidation
force field adaptation
sensorimotor learning
motor adaptation
retrograde inhibition
contextual interference
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00165/full
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminthurer contextualinterferenceeffectisindependentofretroactiveinhibitionbutvariablepracticeisnotalwaysbeneficial
AT benjaminthurer contextualinterferenceeffectisindependentofretroactiveinhibitionbutvariablepracticeisnotalwaysbeneficial
AT sarahgedemer contextualinterferenceeffectisindependentofretroactiveinhibitionbutvariablepracticeisnotalwaysbeneficial
AT annefocke contextualinterferenceeffectisindependentofretroactiveinhibitionbutvariablepracticeisnotalwaysbeneficial
AT thorstenstein contextualinterferenceeffectisindependentofretroactiveinhibitionbutvariablepracticeisnotalwaysbeneficial
_version_ 1724921339209318400