Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial
Positive effects of variable practice conditions on subsequent motor memory consolidation and generalization are widely accepted and described as the contextual interference effect (CIE). However, the general benefits of CIE are low and these benefits might even depend on decreased retest performanc...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00165/full |
id |
doaj-b42c42f730884c4494fa35d4a21ea24b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b42c42f730884c4494fa35d4a21ea24b2020-11-25T02:09:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612019-05-011310.3389/fnhum.2019.00165439226Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always BeneficialBenjamin Thürer0Benjamin Thürer1Sarah Gedemer2Anne Focke3Thorsten Stein4Brain Signaling Group, Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayBioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanyBioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanyBioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanyBioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanyPositive effects of variable practice conditions on subsequent motor memory consolidation and generalization are widely accepted and described as the contextual interference effect (CIE). However, the general benefits of CIE are low and these benefits might even depend on decreased retest performances in the blocked-practicing control group, caused by retroactive inhibition. The aim of this study was to investigate if CIE represents a true learning phenomenon or possibly reflects confounding effects of retroactive inhibition. We tested 48 healthy human participants adapting their reaching movements to three different force field magnitudes. Subjects practiced the force fields in either a Blocked (B), Random (R), or Constant (C) schedule. In addition, subjects of the Blocked group performed either a retest schedule that did (Blocked-Matched; BM) or did not (Blocked-Unmatched; BU) control for retroactive inhibition. Results showed that retroactive inhibition did not affect the results of the BU group much and that the Random group showed a better consolidation performance compared to both Blocked groups. However, compared to the Constant group, the Random group showed only slight benefits in its memory consolidation of the mean performance across all force field magnitudes and no benefits in absolute performance values. This indicates that CIE reflects a true motor learning phenomenon, which is independent of retroactive inhibition. However, random practice is not always beneficial over constant practice.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00165/fullmotor memory consolidationforce field adaptationsensorimotor learningmotor adaptationretrograde inhibitioncontextual interference |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Benjamin Thürer Benjamin Thürer Sarah Gedemer Anne Focke Thorsten Stein |
spellingShingle |
Benjamin Thürer Benjamin Thürer Sarah Gedemer Anne Focke Thorsten Stein Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial Frontiers in Human Neuroscience motor memory consolidation force field adaptation sensorimotor learning motor adaptation retrograde inhibition contextual interference |
author_facet |
Benjamin Thürer Benjamin Thürer Sarah Gedemer Anne Focke Thorsten Stein |
author_sort |
Benjamin Thürer |
title |
Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial |
title_short |
Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial |
title_full |
Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial |
title_fullStr |
Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contextual Interference Effect Is Independent of Retroactive Inhibition but Variable Practice Is Not Always Beneficial |
title_sort |
contextual interference effect is independent of retroactive inhibition but variable practice is not always beneficial |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |
issn |
1662-5161 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
Positive effects of variable practice conditions on subsequent motor memory consolidation and generalization are widely accepted and described as the contextual interference effect (CIE). However, the general benefits of CIE are low and these benefits might even depend on decreased retest performances in the blocked-practicing control group, caused by retroactive inhibition. The aim of this study was to investigate if CIE represents a true learning phenomenon or possibly reflects confounding effects of retroactive inhibition. We tested 48 healthy human participants adapting their reaching movements to three different force field magnitudes. Subjects practiced the force fields in either a Blocked (B), Random (R), or Constant (C) schedule. In addition, subjects of the Blocked group performed either a retest schedule that did (Blocked-Matched; BM) or did not (Blocked-Unmatched; BU) control for retroactive inhibition. Results showed that retroactive inhibition did not affect the results of the BU group much and that the Random group showed a better consolidation performance compared to both Blocked groups. However, compared to the Constant group, the Random group showed only slight benefits in its memory consolidation of the mean performance across all force field magnitudes and no benefits in absolute performance values. This indicates that CIE reflects a true motor learning phenomenon, which is independent of retroactive inhibition. However, random practice is not always beneficial over constant practice. |
topic |
motor memory consolidation force field adaptation sensorimotor learning motor adaptation retrograde inhibition contextual interference |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00165/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT benjaminthurer contextualinterferenceeffectisindependentofretroactiveinhibitionbutvariablepracticeisnotalwaysbeneficial AT benjaminthurer contextualinterferenceeffectisindependentofretroactiveinhibitionbutvariablepracticeisnotalwaysbeneficial AT sarahgedemer contextualinterferenceeffectisindependentofretroactiveinhibitionbutvariablepracticeisnotalwaysbeneficial AT annefocke contextualinterferenceeffectisindependentofretroactiveinhibitionbutvariablepracticeisnotalwaysbeneficial AT thorstenstein contextualinterferenceeffectisindependentofretroactiveinhibitionbutvariablepracticeisnotalwaysbeneficial |
_version_ |
1724921339209318400 |