Language, Terminology, and Inclusive Education: A Case of Kazakhstani Transition to Inclusion

Kazakhstan has adopted the idea of inclusive education. The country has embarked on transforming its education at all levels of schooling to reflect the ethos of equity and inclusion. Tremendous success has been registered so far; however, the language used in the realm of its special/inclusive educ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tsediso Michael Makoelle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020902089
id doaj-b4289356bccb43659227d2f1f152c6cf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b4289356bccb43659227d2f1f152c6cf2020-11-25T03:56:36ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402020-01-011010.1177/2158244020902089Language, Terminology, and Inclusive Education: A Case of Kazakhstani Transition to InclusionTsediso Michael Makoelle0Nazarbayev University, Astana, KazakhstanKazakhstan has adopted the idea of inclusive education. The country has embarked on transforming its education at all levels of schooling to reflect the ethos of equity and inclusion. Tremendous success has been registered so far; however, the language used in the realm of its special/inclusive education has not changed much, as it still bears the hallmarks of the past Soviet vocabulary. Therefore, this article provides an analytic perspective on exclusive terminology and vocabulary still being used, which in one way or another perpetuates misconceptions and stereotypes about diversity and difference. The researcher of this study interviewed school principals, teachers, professionals, and parents in 12 inclusive schools. Reviewed literature includes Kazakhstani education policies, research papers, and speeches delivered by education administrators, politicians, educationists, and experts in the field of special/inclusive education. The implications of the use of language and terminology are discussed in the context of transforming education toward an inclusive education system. Lessons are drawn from the empirical study and literature review, thus making recommendations on how to move forward with the language and terminology change process within the emerging discourse of inclusive education in Kazakhstan.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020902089
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tsediso Michael Makoelle
spellingShingle Tsediso Michael Makoelle
Language, Terminology, and Inclusive Education: A Case of Kazakhstani Transition to Inclusion
SAGE Open
author_facet Tsediso Michael Makoelle
author_sort Tsediso Michael Makoelle
title Language, Terminology, and Inclusive Education: A Case of Kazakhstani Transition to Inclusion
title_short Language, Terminology, and Inclusive Education: A Case of Kazakhstani Transition to Inclusion
title_full Language, Terminology, and Inclusive Education: A Case of Kazakhstani Transition to Inclusion
title_fullStr Language, Terminology, and Inclusive Education: A Case of Kazakhstani Transition to Inclusion
title_full_unstemmed Language, Terminology, and Inclusive Education: A Case of Kazakhstani Transition to Inclusion
title_sort language, terminology, and inclusive education: a case of kazakhstani transition to inclusion
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Kazakhstan has adopted the idea of inclusive education. The country has embarked on transforming its education at all levels of schooling to reflect the ethos of equity and inclusion. Tremendous success has been registered so far; however, the language used in the realm of its special/inclusive education has not changed much, as it still bears the hallmarks of the past Soviet vocabulary. Therefore, this article provides an analytic perspective on exclusive terminology and vocabulary still being used, which in one way or another perpetuates misconceptions and stereotypes about diversity and difference. The researcher of this study interviewed school principals, teachers, professionals, and parents in 12 inclusive schools. Reviewed literature includes Kazakhstani education policies, research papers, and speeches delivered by education administrators, politicians, educationists, and experts in the field of special/inclusive education. The implications of the use of language and terminology are discussed in the context of transforming education toward an inclusive education system. Lessons are drawn from the empirical study and literature review, thus making recommendations on how to move forward with the language and terminology change process within the emerging discourse of inclusive education in Kazakhstan.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020902089
work_keys_str_mv AT tsedisomichaelmakoelle languageterminologyandinclusiveeducationacaseofkazakhstanitransitiontoinclusion
_version_ 1724464012126584832