Remarks on Modeling the Oil Film Generation of Rod Seals

The oil film generation of a U-cup rod seal and the oil film thickness on the rod after outstroke were analyzed analytically, numerically, and experimentally. The analyzed sealing system consists of an unmodified, commercially available U-cup, a polished rod, and mineral oil. The inverse theory of h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oliver Feuchtmüller, Nino Dakov, Lothar Hörl, Frank Bauer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Lubricants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4442/9/9/95
id doaj-b41ab65785c442379992cee18a867657
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b41ab65785c442379992cee18a8676572021-09-26T00:34:57ZengMDPI AGLubricants2075-44422021-09-019959510.3390/lubricants9090095Remarks on Modeling the Oil Film Generation of Rod SealsOliver Feuchtmüller0Nino Dakov1Lothar Hörl2Frank Bauer3Institute of Machine Components, Sealing Technology, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, GermanyInstitute of Machine Components, Sealing Technology, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, GermanyInstitute of Machine Components, Sealing Technology, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, GermanyInstitute of Machine Components, Sealing Technology, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, GermanyThe oil film generation of a U-cup rod seal and the oil film thickness on the rod after outstroke were analyzed analytically, numerically, and experimentally. The analyzed sealing system consists of an unmodified, commercially available U-cup, a polished rod, and mineral oil. The inverse theory of hydrodynamic lubrication (IHL) and an elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) model—both based on the Reynolds equation for thin lubricating films—were utilized to simulate the oil film generation. In the EHL analysis, physical parameters and numerical EHL parameters were varied. Both the analytical and numerical results for the varied parameters show that the film thickness follows a square-root function (i.e., with a function exponent of 0.5) with respect to the product of dynamic viscosity and rod speed, also referred to as the duty parameter. In comparison to the analytical and numerical results, the film thickness obtained via ellipsometry measurements is a function of the duty parameter with an exponent of approximately 0.85. Possible causes for the discrepancy between theory and experiments are discussed. A potential remedy for the modeling gap is proposed.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4442/9/9/95hydraulic rod sealfilm thickness measurementelastohydrodynamic simulationReynolds equation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oliver Feuchtmüller
Nino Dakov
Lothar Hörl
Frank Bauer
spellingShingle Oliver Feuchtmüller
Nino Dakov
Lothar Hörl
Frank Bauer
Remarks on Modeling the Oil Film Generation of Rod Seals
Lubricants
hydraulic rod seal
film thickness measurement
elastohydrodynamic simulation
Reynolds equation
author_facet Oliver Feuchtmüller
Nino Dakov
Lothar Hörl
Frank Bauer
author_sort Oliver Feuchtmüller
title Remarks on Modeling the Oil Film Generation of Rod Seals
title_short Remarks on Modeling the Oil Film Generation of Rod Seals
title_full Remarks on Modeling the Oil Film Generation of Rod Seals
title_fullStr Remarks on Modeling the Oil Film Generation of Rod Seals
title_full_unstemmed Remarks on Modeling the Oil Film Generation of Rod Seals
title_sort remarks on modeling the oil film generation of rod seals
publisher MDPI AG
series Lubricants
issn 2075-4442
publishDate 2021-09-01
description The oil film generation of a U-cup rod seal and the oil film thickness on the rod after outstroke were analyzed analytically, numerically, and experimentally. The analyzed sealing system consists of an unmodified, commercially available U-cup, a polished rod, and mineral oil. The inverse theory of hydrodynamic lubrication (IHL) and an elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) model—both based on the Reynolds equation for thin lubricating films—were utilized to simulate the oil film generation. In the EHL analysis, physical parameters and numerical EHL parameters were varied. Both the analytical and numerical results for the varied parameters show that the film thickness follows a square-root function (i.e., with a function exponent of 0.5) with respect to the product of dynamic viscosity and rod speed, also referred to as the duty parameter. In comparison to the analytical and numerical results, the film thickness obtained via ellipsometry measurements is a function of the duty parameter with an exponent of approximately 0.85. Possible causes for the discrepancy between theory and experiments are discussed. A potential remedy for the modeling gap is proposed.
topic hydraulic rod seal
film thickness measurement
elastohydrodynamic simulation
Reynolds equation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4442/9/9/95
work_keys_str_mv AT oliverfeuchtmuller remarksonmodelingtheoilfilmgenerationofrodseals
AT ninodakov remarksonmodelingtheoilfilmgenerationofrodseals
AT lotharhorl remarksonmodelingtheoilfilmgenerationofrodseals
AT frankbauer remarksonmodelingtheoilfilmgenerationofrodseals
_version_ 1716870371987161088