Learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions in a novel ex-vivo simulation model
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is essential in the management of digestive cancers. However, teaching and learning this technique remain challenging due to the lack of cost-effective models....
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Endoscopy International Open |
Online Access: | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-118176 |
Summary: | Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)
is essential in the management of digestive cancers. However, teaching and
learning this technique remain challenging due to the lack of cost-effective
models.
Material and methods: This was a prospective experimental study using a
complete porcine upper gastrointestinal ex-vivo organ package, placed in an
Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy (EASIE-R), and prepared
with one cyst and two solid masses (2 cm). Five fellows inexperienced in EUS-FNA
were enrolled, performing 10 procedures on each lesion, alternatively. The total
time, number of attempts for success, of needle view losses, and of scope
handling were recorded, associated with an independent skills rating by
procedure. We compared the first 15 procedures with the last 15 for each
fellow.
Results: The fellows successfully performed all procedures in 2 to 40
minutes, requiring 1 to 6 attempts. All (5/5) improved their total time taken
(P < 0.001), number of times when the EUS view of the needle was
lost (P < 0.05), scope handling (P < 0.005), and skills
rating (P < 0.001), whereas 4/5 (80 %) improved their number of
attempts. The overall evaluation showed a significant decrease
(P < 0.001) in the total time taken (11.2 ± 7.8 vs 4.3 ± 2.2 minutes),
number of attempts (2.6 ± 1.2 vs 1.2 ± 0.7), number of times when the EUS view
of the needle was lost (2.3 ± 2 vs 0.5 ± 0.7), and need for scope handling
(1.1 ± 1.7 vs 0.1 ± 0.2). We also observed an improvement in skills rating
(5 ± 1.9 vs. 7.7 ± 1.1).
Conclusion: This newly designed ex-vivo model seems to be an effective way
to improve the initial learning of EUS-FNA, by performing 30
procedures. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2364-3722 2196-9736 |