Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer

Scale development and validation are critical to much of the work in the health, social, and behavioral sciences. However, the constellation of techniques required for scale development and evaluation can be onerous, jargon-filled, unfamiliar, and resource-intensive. Further, it is often not a part...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Godfred O. Boateng, Torsten B. Neilands, Edward A. Frongillo, Hugo R. Melgar-Quiñonez, Sera L. Young
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149/full
id doaj-b40f078ccff3449ea7ded7c88341ccaf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b40f078ccff3449ea7ded7c88341ccaf2020-11-24T21:02:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652018-06-01610.3389/fpubh.2018.00149366616Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A PrimerGodfred O. Boateng0Torsten B. Neilands1Edward A. Frongillo2Hugo R. Melgar-Quiñonez3Sera L. Young4Sera L. Young5Department of Anthropology and Global Health, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United StatesDivision of Prevention Science, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesDepartment of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United StatesInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, CanadaDepartment of Anthropology and Global Health, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United StatesInstitute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United StatesScale development and validation are critical to much of the work in the health, social, and behavioral sciences. However, the constellation of techniques required for scale development and evaluation can be onerous, jargon-filled, unfamiliar, and resource-intensive. Further, it is often not a part of graduate training. Therefore, our goal was to concisely review the process of scale development in as straightforward a manner as possible, both to facilitate the development of new, valid, and reliable scales, and to help improve existing ones. To do this, we have created a primer for best practices for scale development in measuring complex phenomena. This is not a systematic review, but rather the amalgamation of technical literature and lessons learned from our experiences spent creating or adapting a number of scales over the past several decades. We identified three phases that span nine steps. In the first phase, items are generated and the validity of their content is assessed. In the second phase, the scale is constructed. Steps in scale construction include pre-testing the questions, administering the survey, reducing the number of items, and understanding how many factors the scale captures. In the third phase, scale evaluation, the number of dimensions is tested, reliability is tested, and validity is assessed. We have also added examples of best practices to each step. In sum, this primer will equip both scientists and practitioners to understand the ontology and methodology of scale development and validation, thereby facilitating the advancement of our understanding of a range of health, social, and behavioral outcomes.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149/fullscale developmentpsychometric evaluationcontent validityitem reductionfactor analysistests of dimensionality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Godfred O. Boateng
Torsten B. Neilands
Edward A. Frongillo
Hugo R. Melgar-Quiñonez
Sera L. Young
Sera L. Young
spellingShingle Godfred O. Boateng
Torsten B. Neilands
Edward A. Frongillo
Hugo R. Melgar-Quiñonez
Sera L. Young
Sera L. Young
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer
Frontiers in Public Health
scale development
psychometric evaluation
content validity
item reduction
factor analysis
tests of dimensionality
author_facet Godfred O. Boateng
Torsten B. Neilands
Edward A. Frongillo
Hugo R. Melgar-Quiñonez
Sera L. Young
Sera L. Young
author_sort Godfred O. Boateng
title Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer
title_short Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer
title_full Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer
title_fullStr Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer
title_full_unstemmed Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer
title_sort best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Public Health
issn 2296-2565
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Scale development and validation are critical to much of the work in the health, social, and behavioral sciences. However, the constellation of techniques required for scale development and evaluation can be onerous, jargon-filled, unfamiliar, and resource-intensive. Further, it is often not a part of graduate training. Therefore, our goal was to concisely review the process of scale development in as straightforward a manner as possible, both to facilitate the development of new, valid, and reliable scales, and to help improve existing ones. To do this, we have created a primer for best practices for scale development in measuring complex phenomena. This is not a systematic review, but rather the amalgamation of technical literature and lessons learned from our experiences spent creating or adapting a number of scales over the past several decades. We identified three phases that span nine steps. In the first phase, items are generated and the validity of their content is assessed. In the second phase, the scale is constructed. Steps in scale construction include pre-testing the questions, administering the survey, reducing the number of items, and understanding how many factors the scale captures. In the third phase, scale evaluation, the number of dimensions is tested, reliability is tested, and validity is assessed. We have also added examples of best practices to each step. In sum, this primer will equip both scientists and practitioners to understand the ontology and methodology of scale development and validation, thereby facilitating the advancement of our understanding of a range of health, social, and behavioral outcomes.
topic scale development
psychometric evaluation
content validity
item reduction
factor analysis
tests of dimensionality
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149/full
work_keys_str_mv AT godfredoboateng bestpracticesfordevelopingandvalidatingscalesforhealthsocialandbehavioralresearchaprimer
AT torstenbneilands bestpracticesfordevelopingandvalidatingscalesforhealthsocialandbehavioralresearchaprimer
AT edwardafrongillo bestpracticesfordevelopingandvalidatingscalesforhealthsocialandbehavioralresearchaprimer
AT hugormelgarquinonez bestpracticesfordevelopingandvalidatingscalesforhealthsocialandbehavioralresearchaprimer
AT seralyoung bestpracticesfordevelopingandvalidatingscalesforhealthsocialandbehavioralresearchaprimer
AT seralyoung bestpracticesfordevelopingandvalidatingscalesforhealthsocialandbehavioralresearchaprimer
_version_ 1716775711569608704