Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer
Scale development and validation are critical to much of the work in the health, social, and behavioral sciences. However, the constellation of techniques required for scale development and evaluation can be onerous, jargon-filled, unfamiliar, and resource-intensive. Further, it is often not a part...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149/full |
id |
doaj-b40f078ccff3449ea7ded7c88341ccaf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b40f078ccff3449ea7ded7c88341ccaf2020-11-24T21:02:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652018-06-01610.3389/fpubh.2018.00149366616Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A PrimerGodfred O. Boateng0Torsten B. Neilands1Edward A. Frongillo2Hugo R. Melgar-Quiñonez3Sera L. Young4Sera L. Young5Department of Anthropology and Global Health, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United StatesDivision of Prevention Science, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesDepartment of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United StatesInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, CanadaDepartment of Anthropology and Global Health, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United StatesInstitute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United StatesScale development and validation are critical to much of the work in the health, social, and behavioral sciences. However, the constellation of techniques required for scale development and evaluation can be onerous, jargon-filled, unfamiliar, and resource-intensive. Further, it is often not a part of graduate training. Therefore, our goal was to concisely review the process of scale development in as straightforward a manner as possible, both to facilitate the development of new, valid, and reliable scales, and to help improve existing ones. To do this, we have created a primer for best practices for scale development in measuring complex phenomena. This is not a systematic review, but rather the amalgamation of technical literature and lessons learned from our experiences spent creating or adapting a number of scales over the past several decades. We identified three phases that span nine steps. In the first phase, items are generated and the validity of their content is assessed. In the second phase, the scale is constructed. Steps in scale construction include pre-testing the questions, administering the survey, reducing the number of items, and understanding how many factors the scale captures. In the third phase, scale evaluation, the number of dimensions is tested, reliability is tested, and validity is assessed. We have also added examples of best practices to each step. In sum, this primer will equip both scientists and practitioners to understand the ontology and methodology of scale development and validation, thereby facilitating the advancement of our understanding of a range of health, social, and behavioral outcomes.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149/fullscale developmentpsychometric evaluationcontent validityitem reductionfactor analysistests of dimensionality |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Godfred O. Boateng Torsten B. Neilands Edward A. Frongillo Hugo R. Melgar-Quiñonez Sera L. Young Sera L. Young |
spellingShingle |
Godfred O. Boateng Torsten B. Neilands Edward A. Frongillo Hugo R. Melgar-Quiñonez Sera L. Young Sera L. Young Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer Frontiers in Public Health scale development psychometric evaluation content validity item reduction factor analysis tests of dimensionality |
author_facet |
Godfred O. Boateng Torsten B. Neilands Edward A. Frongillo Hugo R. Melgar-Quiñonez Sera L. Young Sera L. Young |
author_sort |
Godfred O. Boateng |
title |
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer |
title_short |
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer |
title_full |
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer |
title_fullStr |
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer |
title_sort |
best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Public Health |
issn |
2296-2565 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
Scale development and validation are critical to much of the work in the health, social, and behavioral sciences. However, the constellation of techniques required for scale development and evaluation can be onerous, jargon-filled, unfamiliar, and resource-intensive. Further, it is often not a part of graduate training. Therefore, our goal was to concisely review the process of scale development in as straightforward a manner as possible, both to facilitate the development of new, valid, and reliable scales, and to help improve existing ones. To do this, we have created a primer for best practices for scale development in measuring complex phenomena. This is not a systematic review, but rather the amalgamation of technical literature and lessons learned from our experiences spent creating or adapting a number of scales over the past several decades. We identified three phases that span nine steps. In the first phase, items are generated and the validity of their content is assessed. In the second phase, the scale is constructed. Steps in scale construction include pre-testing the questions, administering the survey, reducing the number of items, and understanding how many factors the scale captures. In the third phase, scale evaluation, the number of dimensions is tested, reliability is tested, and validity is assessed. We have also added examples of best practices to each step. In sum, this primer will equip both scientists and practitioners to understand the ontology and methodology of scale development and validation, thereby facilitating the advancement of our understanding of a range of health, social, and behavioral outcomes. |
topic |
scale development psychometric evaluation content validity item reduction factor analysis tests of dimensionality |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT godfredoboateng bestpracticesfordevelopingandvalidatingscalesforhealthsocialandbehavioralresearchaprimer AT torstenbneilands bestpracticesfordevelopingandvalidatingscalesforhealthsocialandbehavioralresearchaprimer AT edwardafrongillo bestpracticesfordevelopingandvalidatingscalesforhealthsocialandbehavioralresearchaprimer AT hugormelgarquinonez bestpracticesfordevelopingandvalidatingscalesforhealthsocialandbehavioralresearchaprimer AT seralyoung bestpracticesfordevelopingandvalidatingscalesforhealthsocialandbehavioralresearchaprimer AT seralyoung bestpracticesfordevelopingandvalidatingscalesforhealthsocialandbehavioralresearchaprimer |
_version_ |
1716775711569608704 |