Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review

Abstract There is a significant gap between researchers’ production of evidence and its use by policymakers. Several knowledge transfer strategies have emerged in the past years to promote the use of research. One of those strategies is the policy brief; a short document synthesizing the results of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diana Arnautu, Christian Dagenais
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2021-09-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00885-9
id doaj-b40d28fe7a28482bb5ce30281ad28ef4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b40d28fe7a28482bb5ce30281ad28ef42021-09-19T11:39:53ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922021-09-018111410.1057/s41599-021-00885-9Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping reviewDiana Arnautu0Christian Dagenais1Department of Psychology, University of MontrealDepartment of Psychology, University of MontrealAbstract There is a significant gap between researchers’ production of evidence and its use by policymakers. Several knowledge transfer strategies have emerged in the past years to promote the use of research. One of those strategies is the policy brief; a short document synthesizing the results of one or multiple studies. This scoping study aims to identify the use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer strategy. Twenty-two empirical articles were identified, spanning 35 countries. Results show that policy briefs are considered generally useful, credible and easy to understand. The type of audience is an essential component to consider when writing a policy brief. Introducing a policy brief sooner rather than later might have a bigger impact since it is more effective in creating a belief rather than changing one. The credibility of the policy brief’s author is also a factor taken into consideration by decision-makers. Further research needs to be done to evaluate the various forms of uses of policy briefs by decision-makers.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00885-9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diana Arnautu
Christian Dagenais
spellingShingle Diana Arnautu
Christian Dagenais
Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
author_facet Diana Arnautu
Christian Dagenais
author_sort Diana Arnautu
title Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review
title_short Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review
title_full Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review
title_fullStr Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review
title_sort use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review
publisher Springer Nature
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
issn 2662-9992
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract There is a significant gap between researchers’ production of evidence and its use by policymakers. Several knowledge transfer strategies have emerged in the past years to promote the use of research. One of those strategies is the policy brief; a short document synthesizing the results of one or multiple studies. This scoping study aims to identify the use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer strategy. Twenty-two empirical articles were identified, spanning 35 countries. Results show that policy briefs are considered generally useful, credible and easy to understand. The type of audience is an essential component to consider when writing a policy brief. Introducing a policy brief sooner rather than later might have a bigger impact since it is more effective in creating a belief rather than changing one. The credibility of the policy brief’s author is also a factor taken into consideration by decision-makers. Further research needs to be done to evaluate the various forms of uses of policy briefs by decision-makers.
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00885-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dianaarnautu useandeffectivenessofpolicybriefsasaknowledgetransfertoolascopingreview
AT christiandagenais useandeffectivenessofpolicybriefsasaknowledgetransfertoolascopingreview
_version_ 1717375632156917760