Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States.
We examine international public opinion towards stem-cell research during the period when the issue was at its most contentious. We draw upon representative sample surveys in Europe and North America, fielded in 2005 and find that the majority of people in Europe, Canada and the United States suppor...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5398703?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-b3da9f9e98eb4f4d92b87673b0c5782b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b3da9f9e98eb4f4d92b87673b0c5782b2020-11-24T21:48:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01124e017627410.1371/journal.pone.0176274Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States.Nick AllumAgnes AllansdottirGeorge GaskellJürgen HampelJonathan JacksonAndreea MoldovanSusanna PriestSally StaresPaul StonemanWe examine international public opinion towards stem-cell research during the period when the issue was at its most contentious. We draw upon representative sample surveys in Europe and North America, fielded in 2005 and find that the majority of people in Europe, Canada and the United States supported stem-cell research, providing it was tightly regulated, but that there were key differences between the geographical regions in the relative importance of different types of ethical position. In the U.S., moral acceptability was more influential as a driver of support for stem-cell research; in Europe the perceived benefit to society carried more weight; and in Canada the two were almost equally important. We also find that public opinion on stem-cell research was more strongly associated with religious convictions in the U.S. than in Canada and Europe, although many strongly religious citizens in all regions approved of stem-cell research. We conclude that if anything public opinion or 'public ethics' are likely to play an increasingly important role in framing policy and regulatory regimes for sensitive technologies in the future.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5398703?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nick Allum Agnes Allansdottir George Gaskell Jürgen Hampel Jonathan Jackson Andreea Moldovan Susanna Priest Sally Stares Paul Stoneman |
spellingShingle |
Nick Allum Agnes Allansdottir George Gaskell Jürgen Hampel Jonathan Jackson Andreea Moldovan Susanna Priest Sally Stares Paul Stoneman Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Nick Allum Agnes Allansdottir George Gaskell Jürgen Hampel Jonathan Jackson Andreea Moldovan Susanna Priest Sally Stares Paul Stoneman |
author_sort |
Nick Allum |
title |
Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States. |
title_short |
Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States. |
title_full |
Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States. |
title_fullStr |
Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States. |
title_sort |
religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: attitudes in europe, canada and the united states. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
We examine international public opinion towards stem-cell research during the period when the issue was at its most contentious. We draw upon representative sample surveys in Europe and North America, fielded in 2005 and find that the majority of people in Europe, Canada and the United States supported stem-cell research, providing it was tightly regulated, but that there were key differences between the geographical regions in the relative importance of different types of ethical position. In the U.S., moral acceptability was more influential as a driver of support for stem-cell research; in Europe the perceived benefit to society carried more weight; and in Canada the two were almost equally important. We also find that public opinion on stem-cell research was more strongly associated with religious convictions in the U.S. than in Canada and Europe, although many strongly religious citizens in all regions approved of stem-cell research. We conclude that if anything public opinion or 'public ethics' are likely to play an increasingly important role in framing policy and regulatory regimes for sensitive technologies in the future. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5398703?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nickallum religionandthepublicethicsofstemcellresearchattitudesineuropecanadaandtheunitedstates AT agnesallansdottir religionandthepublicethicsofstemcellresearchattitudesineuropecanadaandtheunitedstates AT georgegaskell religionandthepublicethicsofstemcellresearchattitudesineuropecanadaandtheunitedstates AT jurgenhampel religionandthepublicethicsofstemcellresearchattitudesineuropecanadaandtheunitedstates AT jonathanjackson religionandthepublicethicsofstemcellresearchattitudesineuropecanadaandtheunitedstates AT andreeamoldovan religionandthepublicethicsofstemcellresearchattitudesineuropecanadaandtheunitedstates AT susannapriest religionandthepublicethicsofstemcellresearchattitudesineuropecanadaandtheunitedstates AT sallystares religionandthepublicethicsofstemcellresearchattitudesineuropecanadaandtheunitedstates AT paulstoneman religionandthepublicethicsofstemcellresearchattitudesineuropecanadaandtheunitedstates |
_version_ |
1725892442095353856 |