Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection relative to two types of control patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Studies on risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection have provided inconsistent results, partly due to the choice of the control group. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk factors for CRKP infection by comparing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei-min Zhu, Zhe Yuan, Hong-yu Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-01-01
Series:Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-0686-0
id doaj-b3d286c8374d4b3091ee3ae806b0ad55
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b3d286c8374d4b3091ee3ae806b0ad552021-01-31T12:08:23ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942020-01-019111310.1186/s13756-020-0686-0Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection relative to two types of control patients: a systematic review and meta-analysisWei-min Zhu0Zhe Yuan1Hong-yu Zhou2Division of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDivision of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Hospital Infection Control, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityAbstract Background Studies on risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection have provided inconsistent results, partly due to the choice of the control group. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk factors for CRKP infection by comparing CRKP-infected patients with two types of controls: patients infected with carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae (comparison 1) or patients not infected with CRKP (comparison 2). Methods Data on potentially relevant risk factors for CRKP infection were extracted from studies indexed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science or EBSCO databases from January 1996 to April 2019, and meta-analyzed based on the outcomes for each type of comparison. Results The meta-analysis included 18 studies for comparison 1 and 14 studies for comparison 2. The following eight risk factors were common to both comparisons: admission to intensive care unit (ICU; odds ratio, ORcomparison 1 = 3.20, ORcomparison 2 = 4.44), central venous catheter use (2.62, 3.85), mechanical ventilation (2.70, 4.78), tracheostomy (2.11, 8.48), urinary catheter use (1.99, 0.27), prior use of antibiotic (6.07, 1.61), exposure to carbapenems (4.16, 3.84) and exposure to aminoglycosides (1.85, 1.80). Another 10 risk factors were unique to comparison 1: longer length of hospital stay (OR = 15.28); prior hospitalization (within the previous 6 months) (OR = 1.91); renal dysfunction (OR = 2.17); neurological disorders (OR = 1.52); nasogastric tube use (OR = 2.62); dialysis (OR = 3.56); and exposure to quinolones (OR = 2.11), fluoroquinolones (OR = 2.03), glycopeptides (OR = 3.70) and vancomycin (OR = 2.82). Conclusions Eighteen factors may increase the risk of carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae infection; eight factors may be associated with both K. pneumoniae infections in general and CRKP in particular. The eight shared factors are likely to be ‘true’ risk factors for CRKP infection. Evaluation of risk factors in different situations may be helpful for empirical treatment and prevention of CRKP infections.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-0686-0Klebsiella pneumoniaeCarbapenem-resistanceInfectionRisk factorSystematic reviewMeta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wei-min Zhu
Zhe Yuan
Hong-yu Zhou
spellingShingle Wei-min Zhu
Zhe Yuan
Hong-yu Zhou
Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection relative to two types of control patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Carbapenem-resistance
Infection
Risk factor
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
author_facet Wei-min Zhu
Zhe Yuan
Hong-yu Zhou
author_sort Wei-min Zhu
title Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection relative to two types of control patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection relative to two types of control patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection relative to two types of control patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection relative to two types of control patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection relative to two types of control patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort risk factors for carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae infection relative to two types of control patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher BMC
series Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
issn 2047-2994
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Background Studies on risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection have provided inconsistent results, partly due to the choice of the control group. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk factors for CRKP infection by comparing CRKP-infected patients with two types of controls: patients infected with carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae (comparison 1) or patients not infected with CRKP (comparison 2). Methods Data on potentially relevant risk factors for CRKP infection were extracted from studies indexed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science or EBSCO databases from January 1996 to April 2019, and meta-analyzed based on the outcomes for each type of comparison. Results The meta-analysis included 18 studies for comparison 1 and 14 studies for comparison 2. The following eight risk factors were common to both comparisons: admission to intensive care unit (ICU; odds ratio, ORcomparison 1 = 3.20, ORcomparison 2 = 4.44), central venous catheter use (2.62, 3.85), mechanical ventilation (2.70, 4.78), tracheostomy (2.11, 8.48), urinary catheter use (1.99, 0.27), prior use of antibiotic (6.07, 1.61), exposure to carbapenems (4.16, 3.84) and exposure to aminoglycosides (1.85, 1.80). Another 10 risk factors were unique to comparison 1: longer length of hospital stay (OR = 15.28); prior hospitalization (within the previous 6 months) (OR = 1.91); renal dysfunction (OR = 2.17); neurological disorders (OR = 1.52); nasogastric tube use (OR = 2.62); dialysis (OR = 3.56); and exposure to quinolones (OR = 2.11), fluoroquinolones (OR = 2.03), glycopeptides (OR = 3.70) and vancomycin (OR = 2.82). Conclusions Eighteen factors may increase the risk of carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae infection; eight factors may be associated with both K. pneumoniae infections in general and CRKP in particular. The eight shared factors are likely to be ‘true’ risk factors for CRKP infection. Evaluation of risk factors in different situations may be helpful for empirical treatment and prevention of CRKP infections.
topic Klebsiella pneumoniae
Carbapenem-resistance
Infection
Risk factor
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-0686-0
work_keys_str_mv AT weiminzhu riskfactorsforcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeinfectionrelativetotwotypesofcontrolpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zheyuan riskfactorsforcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeinfectionrelativetotwotypesofcontrolpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hongyuzhou riskfactorsforcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeinfectionrelativetotwotypesofcontrolpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724317549923926016