Retrospective evaluation of outcomes in lumbar disc surgery with spinal anesthesia

Objective: We investigated feasibility, possible advantages and disadvantages of spinal anesthesia in lomber disc surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 100 patients operated for elective lomber spinal surgery under spinal anesthesia. Results: Spinal anesthesia was sufficient for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vaner Köksal, Ahmet Şen, Başar Erdivanlı, Bülent Özdemir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Modestum Publishing LTD 2014-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jceionline.org/upload/sayi/20/JCEI-00804.pdf
id doaj-b3ba000c48ca467abbe6b169f5df6600
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b3ba000c48ca467abbe6b169f5df66002021-09-02T02:06:45ZengModestum Publishing LTDJournal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations1309-85781309-66212014-03-0151545810.5799/ahinjs.01.2014.01.0359Retrospective evaluation of outcomes in lumbar disc surgery with spinal anesthesiaVaner Köksal0Ahmet Şen1Başar Erdivanlı2Bülent Özdemir3Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Nöroşirürji Anabilim Dalı, Rize, TürkiyeRecep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim, Dalı Rize, TürkiyeRecep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim, Dalı Rize, TürkiyeRecep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Nöroşirürji Anabilim Dalı, Rize, TürkiyeObjective: We investigated feasibility, possible advantages and disadvantages of spinal anesthesia in lomber disc surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 100 patients operated for elective lomber spinal surgery under spinal anesthesia. Results: Spinal anesthesia was sufficient for lumbar disc surgery in 97 of 100 patients. Three patients received general anesthesia due to insufficient spinal block. Allergic reaction was observed in one patient receiving general anesthesia, and treated with intravenous steroid and antihistaminic drugs. We observed bradycardia and hypotension necessitating ephedrine administration in eight patients, post dural puncture headache in 10 patients (two patients were discharged at 4 and 7 days later therefore), who received spinal anesthesia. Following spinal anesthesia, patients required first analgesic at 10th hour. Patients receiving general anesthesia demanded first analgesic in the post operative care unit. Conclusion: We are of the opinion that spinal anesthesia may be safely used in lumbar disc surgeries, provided that patients are not positioned until sufficient anxiolytic and spinal block are established. J Clin Exp Invest 2014; 5 (1): 54-58http://www.jceionline.org/upload/sayi/20/JCEI-00804.pdfSpinal anesthesiaspinal surgeryintraoperative complications
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vaner Köksal
Ahmet Şen
Başar Erdivanlı
Bülent Özdemir
spellingShingle Vaner Köksal
Ahmet Şen
Başar Erdivanlı
Bülent Özdemir
Retrospective evaluation of outcomes in lumbar disc surgery with spinal anesthesia
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations
Spinal anesthesia
spinal surgery
intraoperative complications
author_facet Vaner Köksal
Ahmet Şen
Başar Erdivanlı
Bülent Özdemir
author_sort Vaner Köksal
title Retrospective evaluation of outcomes in lumbar disc surgery with spinal anesthesia
title_short Retrospective evaluation of outcomes in lumbar disc surgery with spinal anesthesia
title_full Retrospective evaluation of outcomes in lumbar disc surgery with spinal anesthesia
title_fullStr Retrospective evaluation of outcomes in lumbar disc surgery with spinal anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective evaluation of outcomes in lumbar disc surgery with spinal anesthesia
title_sort retrospective evaluation of outcomes in lumbar disc surgery with spinal anesthesia
publisher Modestum Publishing LTD
series Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations
issn 1309-8578
1309-6621
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Objective: We investigated feasibility, possible advantages and disadvantages of spinal anesthesia in lomber disc surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 100 patients operated for elective lomber spinal surgery under spinal anesthesia. Results: Spinal anesthesia was sufficient for lumbar disc surgery in 97 of 100 patients. Three patients received general anesthesia due to insufficient spinal block. Allergic reaction was observed in one patient receiving general anesthesia, and treated with intravenous steroid and antihistaminic drugs. We observed bradycardia and hypotension necessitating ephedrine administration in eight patients, post dural puncture headache in 10 patients (two patients were discharged at 4 and 7 days later therefore), who received spinal anesthesia. Following spinal anesthesia, patients required first analgesic at 10th hour. Patients receiving general anesthesia demanded first analgesic in the post operative care unit. Conclusion: We are of the opinion that spinal anesthesia may be safely used in lumbar disc surgeries, provided that patients are not positioned until sufficient anxiolytic and spinal block are established. J Clin Exp Invest 2014; 5 (1): 54-58
topic Spinal anesthesia
spinal surgery
intraoperative complications
url http://www.jceionline.org/upload/sayi/20/JCEI-00804.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vanerkoksal retrospectiveevaluationofoutcomesinlumbardiscsurgerywithspinalanesthesia
AT ahmetsen retrospectiveevaluationofoutcomesinlumbardiscsurgerywithspinalanesthesia
AT basarerdivanlı retrospectiveevaluationofoutcomesinlumbardiscsurgerywithspinalanesthesia
AT bulentozdemir retrospectiveevaluationofoutcomesinlumbardiscsurgerywithspinalanesthesia
_version_ 1721181508429938688