Intercomparison between aerosol optical properties by a PREDE skyradiometer and CIMEL sunphotometer over Beijing, China

This study compares the aerosol optical and physical properties simultaneously measured by a SKYNET PREDE skyradiometer and AERONET/PHOTONS CIMEL sunphotometer at a location in Beijing, China. Aerosol optical properties (AOP) including the Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD), Angstrom exponent (<i&am...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. Che, G. Shi, A. Uchiyama, A. Yamazaki, H. Chen, P. Goloub, X. Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2008-06-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/3199/2008/acp-8-3199-2008.pdf
id doaj-b3ac47be0e9647f3a278a8d3ef09ca68
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b3ac47be0e9647f3a278a8d3ef09ca682020-11-24T20:55:54ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242008-06-0181231993214Intercomparison between aerosol optical properties by a PREDE skyradiometer and CIMEL sunphotometer over Beijing, ChinaH. CheG. ShiA. UchiyamaA. YamazakiH. ChenP. GoloubX. ZhangThis study compares the aerosol optical and physical properties simultaneously measured by a SKYNET PREDE skyradiometer and AERONET/PHOTONS CIMEL sunphotometer at a location in Beijing, China. Aerosol optical properties (AOP) including the Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD), Angstrom exponent (<i>α</i>), volume size distribution, single scattering albedo (<i>ω</i>) and the complex refractive index were compared. The difference between the two types of instruments was less than 1.3% for the AOD and less than 4% for the single scattering albedo below the wavelength of 670 nm. There is a difference between the volume size distribution patterns derived from two instruments, which is probably due to difference of measurement protocols and inversion algorithms for the respective instruments. <br></br> AOP under three distinct weather conditions (background, haze, and dust days) over Beijing were compared by using the retrieved skyradiometer and sunphotometer data combined with MODIS satellite results, pyranometer measurements, PM<sub>10</sub> measurements, and backtrajectory analysis. The results show that the significant difference of AOP under background, haze, and dust days over Beijing is probably due to different aerosol components under distinct weather conditions. http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/3199/2008/acp-8-3199-2008.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. Che
G. Shi
A. Uchiyama
A. Yamazaki
H. Chen
P. Goloub
X. Zhang
spellingShingle H. Che
G. Shi
A. Uchiyama
A. Yamazaki
H. Chen
P. Goloub
X. Zhang
Intercomparison between aerosol optical properties by a PREDE skyradiometer and CIMEL sunphotometer over Beijing, China
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet H. Che
G. Shi
A. Uchiyama
A. Yamazaki
H. Chen
P. Goloub
X. Zhang
author_sort H. Che
title Intercomparison between aerosol optical properties by a PREDE skyradiometer and CIMEL sunphotometer over Beijing, China
title_short Intercomparison between aerosol optical properties by a PREDE skyradiometer and CIMEL sunphotometer over Beijing, China
title_full Intercomparison between aerosol optical properties by a PREDE skyradiometer and CIMEL sunphotometer over Beijing, China
title_fullStr Intercomparison between aerosol optical properties by a PREDE skyradiometer and CIMEL sunphotometer over Beijing, China
title_full_unstemmed Intercomparison between aerosol optical properties by a PREDE skyradiometer and CIMEL sunphotometer over Beijing, China
title_sort intercomparison between aerosol optical properties by a prede skyradiometer and cimel sunphotometer over beijing, china
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2008-06-01
description This study compares the aerosol optical and physical properties simultaneously measured by a SKYNET PREDE skyradiometer and AERONET/PHOTONS CIMEL sunphotometer at a location in Beijing, China. Aerosol optical properties (AOP) including the Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD), Angstrom exponent (<i>α</i>), volume size distribution, single scattering albedo (<i>ω</i>) and the complex refractive index were compared. The difference between the two types of instruments was less than 1.3% for the AOD and less than 4% for the single scattering albedo below the wavelength of 670 nm. There is a difference between the volume size distribution patterns derived from two instruments, which is probably due to difference of measurement protocols and inversion algorithms for the respective instruments. <br></br> AOP under three distinct weather conditions (background, haze, and dust days) over Beijing were compared by using the retrieved skyradiometer and sunphotometer data combined with MODIS satellite results, pyranometer measurements, PM<sub>10</sub> measurements, and backtrajectory analysis. The results show that the significant difference of AOP under background, haze, and dust days over Beijing is probably due to different aerosol components under distinct weather conditions.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/3199/2008/acp-8-3199-2008.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hche intercomparisonbetweenaerosolopticalpropertiesbyapredeskyradiometerandcimelsunphotometeroverbeijingchina
AT gshi intercomparisonbetweenaerosolopticalpropertiesbyapredeskyradiometerandcimelsunphotometeroverbeijingchina
AT auchiyama intercomparisonbetweenaerosolopticalpropertiesbyapredeskyradiometerandcimelsunphotometeroverbeijingchina
AT ayamazaki intercomparisonbetweenaerosolopticalpropertiesbyapredeskyradiometerandcimelsunphotometeroverbeijingchina
AT hchen intercomparisonbetweenaerosolopticalpropertiesbyapredeskyradiometerandcimelsunphotometeroverbeijingchina
AT pgoloub intercomparisonbetweenaerosolopticalpropertiesbyapredeskyradiometerandcimelsunphotometeroverbeijingchina
AT xzhang intercomparisonbetweenaerosolopticalpropertiesbyapredeskyradiometerandcimelsunphotometeroverbeijingchina
_version_ 1716791576604180480