Proto-Nationalisms as Sub-Text for the Crisis of Governance in Nigeria
There are several accounts of the genealogy and manifestations of the myriad governance crises, which Nigeria continues to face five decades after independence. Although no single account is sufficient to explain the governance misadventures, one key point resonating is that progress and development...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2016-04-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016643139 |
id |
doaj-b3930b3788ef42ee9a8070e8ba4cc020 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b3930b3788ef42ee9a8070e8ba4cc0202020-11-25T03:22:47ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402016-04-01610.1177/215824401664313910.1177_2158244016643139Proto-Nationalisms as Sub-Text for the Crisis of Governance in NigeriaTaiwo Akanbi Olaiya0Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, NigeriaThere are several accounts of the genealogy and manifestations of the myriad governance crises, which Nigeria continues to face five decades after independence. Although no single account is sufficient to explain the governance misadventures, one key point resonating is that progress and development have proved elusive over the years. In this article, we seek to move away from the dominant characterization of this governance crisis as deriving directly from the consequences of a monolithic oil economy, a deeply fractured and volatile political terrain, or even corrupt and patrimonial rule. Instead, the article locates the root of Nigeria’s governance crisis in the queer pattern of the emergence, reinvention, and manipulation of proto-nationalisms characterized not by any nationalistic quest for independence and spatial liberation but one pursued to gain foothold in governance and to partake in its perquisites. Invariably, the post-colonial nation-states that emerged at independence in many African countries, for the most part, neither followed through with any logical expression of genuine nationalism nor mobilized toward a shared vision of nationhood. The article shows how individuals and groups within the polity soon became locked in contested and irreconcilable positions that further made the construction of a truly nationalistic identity difficult, if not forlorn. This article submits that successive post-colonial administrations unimaginatively followed the divide-and-rule traditions of the colonial state and thus failed to mobilize the popular support required for the construction of a broad-based national identity that is key to managing the protracted governance crises the country has experienced since independence.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016643139 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Taiwo Akanbi Olaiya |
spellingShingle |
Taiwo Akanbi Olaiya Proto-Nationalisms as Sub-Text for the Crisis of Governance in Nigeria SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Taiwo Akanbi Olaiya |
author_sort |
Taiwo Akanbi Olaiya |
title |
Proto-Nationalisms as Sub-Text for the Crisis of Governance in Nigeria |
title_short |
Proto-Nationalisms as Sub-Text for the Crisis of Governance in Nigeria |
title_full |
Proto-Nationalisms as Sub-Text for the Crisis of Governance in Nigeria |
title_fullStr |
Proto-Nationalisms as Sub-Text for the Crisis of Governance in Nigeria |
title_full_unstemmed |
Proto-Nationalisms as Sub-Text for the Crisis of Governance in Nigeria |
title_sort |
proto-nationalisms as sub-text for the crisis of governance in nigeria |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2016-04-01 |
description |
There are several accounts of the genealogy and manifestations of the myriad governance crises, which Nigeria continues to face five decades after independence. Although no single account is sufficient to explain the governance misadventures, one key point resonating is that progress and development have proved elusive over the years. In this article, we seek to move away from the dominant characterization of this governance crisis as deriving directly from the consequences of a monolithic oil economy, a deeply fractured and volatile political terrain, or even corrupt and patrimonial rule. Instead, the article locates the root of Nigeria’s governance crisis in the queer pattern of the emergence, reinvention, and manipulation of proto-nationalisms characterized not by any nationalistic quest for independence and spatial liberation but one pursued to gain foothold in governance and to partake in its perquisites. Invariably, the post-colonial nation-states that emerged at independence in many African countries, for the most part, neither followed through with any logical expression of genuine nationalism nor mobilized toward a shared vision of nationhood. The article shows how individuals and groups within the polity soon became locked in contested and irreconcilable positions that further made the construction of a truly nationalistic identity difficult, if not forlorn. This article submits that successive post-colonial administrations unimaginatively followed the divide-and-rule traditions of the colonial state and thus failed to mobilize the popular support required for the construction of a broad-based national identity that is key to managing the protracted governance crises the country has experienced since independence. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016643139 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT taiwoakanbiolaiya protonationalismsassubtextforthecrisisofgovernanceinnigeria |
_version_ |
1724609620321763328 |