Co-integration analysis of capture–recapture method in toad, Phrynoidis aspera (Gravenhorst, 1829)

The Asian giant toad, Phrynoidis aspera, research is faced mainly with twin challenges of conservation and efficient sampling techniques for research purposes. This research is therefore conducted to assess the co-integration feature of the capture–recapture methods and to evaluate both long- and sh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anuar Mohd Sar Shahrul, Taofik Oyedele Dauda, C.C. Hong, Evan Quah, Taiwo Omodele
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287884X18301833
id doaj-b3897e3029174c9c95d6a313d1dbda0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b3897e3029174c9c95d6a313d1dbda0d2021-04-02T17:41:56ZengElsevierJournal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity2287-884X2019-03-01121713Co-integration analysis of capture–recapture method in toad, Phrynoidis aspera (Gravenhorst, 1829)Anuar Mohd Sar Shahrul0Taofik Oyedele Dauda1C.C. Hong2Evan Quah3Taiwo Omodele4School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau, Penang, 11800, MalaysiaSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau, Penang, 11800, Malaysia; Institute of Agricultural Research and Training, Obafemi Awolowo University, PMB 5029, Ibadan, Nigeria; Corresponding author. Institute of Agricultural Research and Training, Obafemi Awolowo University, PMB 5029, Moor Plantation, Ibadan, Nigeria.School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau, Penang, 11800, MalaysiaSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau, Penang, 11800, MalaysiaInstitute of Agricultural Research and Training, Obafemi Awolowo University, PMB 5029, Ibadan, NigeriaThe Asian giant toad, Phrynoidis aspera, research is faced mainly with twin challenges of conservation and efficient sampling techniques for research purposes. This research is therefore conducted to assess the co-integration feature of the capture–recapture methods and to evaluate both long- and short-term effect of capture on the recapture of P. aspera using Titi Kerawang waterfall (N05° 24.23/E100° 13.41/), Teluk Bahang. Toads encountered in the study area were caught and marked using PIT tags weekly. Data obtained were subjected to summary statistics (mean, standard error, and variance), correlogram, cross-correlogram, stationary test, and exogenous and endogenous variable determination. Mean Asian giant toad recaptured fell between three for the 2nd week and 25 for the 14th week. For the capture, the range was between zero for the 12th week and nine for the 3rd week, while the 1st capture was 12 toads. There was no visible similarity in the variances of the toad indices indicated by the correlogram of both capture and recapture as well as their cross-correlogram. The cross-correlogram ranged between 0.6665 and 0.4029. From these results, randomness of data as well as their independence can thus be established. Also, the results portray that the summary statistics does not present any visible stationary trend in both toad capture and recapture. The raw data can therefore be said to be nonstationary (that is variance of toad capture/recapture in a week, xt is not dependent on preceding week, xt-1). The augmented Dickey–Fuller statistics of both capture (−0.97294 to −3.92035) and recapture (−1.13288 to 4.00443) indicated strong evidence that both capture and recapture series of the nontransformed data on the long run are I(1). The short-run co-integration according to this study contrast with the long-run co-integration. Keywords: Endogenous, Equilibria, Exogenous, Long-run, Stationaryhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287884X18301833
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anuar Mohd Sar Shahrul
Taofik Oyedele Dauda
C.C. Hong
Evan Quah
Taiwo Omodele
spellingShingle Anuar Mohd Sar Shahrul
Taofik Oyedele Dauda
C.C. Hong
Evan Quah
Taiwo Omodele
Co-integration analysis of capture–recapture method in toad, Phrynoidis aspera (Gravenhorst, 1829)
Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity
author_facet Anuar Mohd Sar Shahrul
Taofik Oyedele Dauda
C.C. Hong
Evan Quah
Taiwo Omodele
author_sort Anuar Mohd Sar Shahrul
title Co-integration analysis of capture–recapture method in toad, Phrynoidis aspera (Gravenhorst, 1829)
title_short Co-integration analysis of capture–recapture method in toad, Phrynoidis aspera (Gravenhorst, 1829)
title_full Co-integration analysis of capture–recapture method in toad, Phrynoidis aspera (Gravenhorst, 1829)
title_fullStr Co-integration analysis of capture–recapture method in toad, Phrynoidis aspera (Gravenhorst, 1829)
title_full_unstemmed Co-integration analysis of capture–recapture method in toad, Phrynoidis aspera (Gravenhorst, 1829)
title_sort co-integration analysis of capture–recapture method in toad, phrynoidis aspera (gravenhorst, 1829)
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity
issn 2287-884X
publishDate 2019-03-01
description The Asian giant toad, Phrynoidis aspera, research is faced mainly with twin challenges of conservation and efficient sampling techniques for research purposes. This research is therefore conducted to assess the co-integration feature of the capture–recapture methods and to evaluate both long- and short-term effect of capture on the recapture of P. aspera using Titi Kerawang waterfall (N05° 24.23/E100° 13.41/), Teluk Bahang. Toads encountered in the study area were caught and marked using PIT tags weekly. Data obtained were subjected to summary statistics (mean, standard error, and variance), correlogram, cross-correlogram, stationary test, and exogenous and endogenous variable determination. Mean Asian giant toad recaptured fell between three for the 2nd week and 25 for the 14th week. For the capture, the range was between zero for the 12th week and nine for the 3rd week, while the 1st capture was 12 toads. There was no visible similarity in the variances of the toad indices indicated by the correlogram of both capture and recapture as well as their cross-correlogram. The cross-correlogram ranged between 0.6665 and 0.4029. From these results, randomness of data as well as their independence can thus be established. Also, the results portray that the summary statistics does not present any visible stationary trend in both toad capture and recapture. The raw data can therefore be said to be nonstationary (that is variance of toad capture/recapture in a week, xt is not dependent on preceding week, xt-1). The augmented Dickey–Fuller statistics of both capture (−0.97294 to −3.92035) and recapture (−1.13288 to 4.00443) indicated strong evidence that both capture and recapture series of the nontransformed data on the long run are I(1). The short-run co-integration according to this study contrast with the long-run co-integration. Keywords: Endogenous, Equilibria, Exogenous, Long-run, Stationary
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287884X18301833
work_keys_str_mv AT anuarmohdsarshahrul cointegrationanalysisofcapturerecapturemethodintoadphrynoidisasperagravenhorst1829
AT taofikoyedeledauda cointegrationanalysisofcapturerecapturemethodintoadphrynoidisasperagravenhorst1829
AT cchong cointegrationanalysisofcapturerecapturemethodintoadphrynoidisasperagravenhorst1829
AT evanquah cointegrationanalysisofcapturerecapturemethodintoadphrynoidisasperagravenhorst1829
AT taiwoomodele cointegrationanalysisofcapturerecapturemethodintoadphrynoidisasperagravenhorst1829
_version_ 1721553623410802688