| Summary: | This paper proposes a scientific criticism of “Redefining claim preclusion from verdict sovereignty", in which the immediate execution of the sentence to those convicted by the jury trials is defended. From the delimitation of the concept of democracy in the criminal procedure, this paper addresses the problems of the ideological inversion of discourse around the procedural guarantees that, in the hypothesis of the article, led to the argumentative use of the sovereignty of verdicts for the purpose of expanding the criminal power. In addition, this paper operates the concept of normative culpability of the presumption of innocence, a key category for understanding the resources and the impossibility of execution of the sentence immediately or anticipated, before the claim preclusion of guilty criminal sentence.
|
|---|
