The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape

Community forest management (CFM) is identified by many actors as a core strategy for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD+). Others however see REDD+ as a danger to CFM. In response to these contrasting views, we carried out a systematic review...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johanne Pelletier, Nancy Gélinas, Margaret Skutsch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-08-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/8/170
id doaj-b3836ed0e014439395b15a528c53bdc3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b3836ed0e014439395b15a528c53bdc32020-11-24T22:33:29ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072016-08-017817010.3390/f7080170f7080170The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ LandscapeJohanne Pelletier0Nancy Gélinas1Margaret Skutsch2Woods Hole Research Center, 149 Woods Hole Rd, Falmouth, MA 02540-1644, USADépartement des Sciences du Bois et de la Forêt, Faculté de Foresterie, Géographie et Géomatique, Université Laval, 2405, Rue de la Terrasse Pavillon Abitibi-Price, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, CanadaCentro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (CIGA-UNAM), Campus Morelia, Michoacán, 58190, MexicoCommunity forest management (CFM) is identified by many actors as a core strategy for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD+). Others however see REDD+ as a danger to CFM. In response to these contrasting views, we carried out a systematic review of CFM case studies to look at CFM’s potential role in achieving forest carbon benefits and social co-benefits for forest communities. We evaluated the potential impacts of REDD+ on CFM. Our review showed that there is strong evidence of CFM’s role in reducing degradation and stabilizing forested landscapes; however, the review also showed less evidence about the role of CFM in reducing deforestation. For social benefits, we found that CFM contributes to livelihoods, but its effect on poverty reduction may be limited. Also, CFM may not deal adequately with the distribution of benefits within communities or user groups. These insights are important for CFM-based REDD+ intervention; measures should be adopted to overcome these gaps. Innovative incentive structures to existing CFM are discussed. The recognition of rights for forest communities is one first step identified in promoting CFM. We call for sound empirical impact evaluations that analyze CFM and CFM-based REDD+ interventions by looking at both biophysical and social outcomes.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/8/170community forest managementreducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+)livelihoodsbenefit sharing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Johanne Pelletier
Nancy Gélinas
Margaret Skutsch
spellingShingle Johanne Pelletier
Nancy Gélinas
Margaret Skutsch
The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape
Forests
community forest management
reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+)
livelihoods
benefit sharing
author_facet Johanne Pelletier
Nancy Gélinas
Margaret Skutsch
author_sort Johanne Pelletier
title The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape
title_short The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape
title_full The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape
title_fullStr The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape
title_full_unstemmed The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape
title_sort place of community forest management in the redd+ landscape
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2016-08-01
description Community forest management (CFM) is identified by many actors as a core strategy for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD+). Others however see REDD+ as a danger to CFM. In response to these contrasting views, we carried out a systematic review of CFM case studies to look at CFM’s potential role in achieving forest carbon benefits and social co-benefits for forest communities. We evaluated the potential impacts of REDD+ on CFM. Our review showed that there is strong evidence of CFM’s role in reducing degradation and stabilizing forested landscapes; however, the review also showed less evidence about the role of CFM in reducing deforestation. For social benefits, we found that CFM contributes to livelihoods, but its effect on poverty reduction may be limited. Also, CFM may not deal adequately with the distribution of benefits within communities or user groups. These insights are important for CFM-based REDD+ intervention; measures should be adopted to overcome these gaps. Innovative incentive structures to existing CFM are discussed. The recognition of rights for forest communities is one first step identified in promoting CFM. We call for sound empirical impact evaluations that analyze CFM and CFM-based REDD+ interventions by looking at both biophysical and social outcomes.
topic community forest management
reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+)
livelihoods
benefit sharing
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/8/170
work_keys_str_mv AT johannepelletier theplaceofcommunityforestmanagementinthereddlandscape
AT nancygelinas theplaceofcommunityforestmanagementinthereddlandscape
AT margaretskutsch theplaceofcommunityforestmanagementinthereddlandscape
AT johannepelletier placeofcommunityforestmanagementinthereddlandscape
AT nancygelinas placeofcommunityforestmanagementinthereddlandscape
AT margaretskutsch placeofcommunityforestmanagementinthereddlandscape
_version_ 1725730753600290816