The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape
Community forest management (CFM) is identified by many actors as a core strategy for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD+). Others however see REDD+ as a danger to CFM. In response to these contrasting views, we carried out a systematic review...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-08-01
|
Series: | Forests |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/8/170 |
id |
doaj-b3836ed0e014439395b15a528c53bdc3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b3836ed0e014439395b15a528c53bdc32020-11-24T22:33:29ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072016-08-017817010.3390/f7080170f7080170The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ LandscapeJohanne Pelletier0Nancy Gélinas1Margaret Skutsch2Woods Hole Research Center, 149 Woods Hole Rd, Falmouth, MA 02540-1644, USADépartement des Sciences du Bois et de la Forêt, Faculté de Foresterie, Géographie et Géomatique, Université Laval, 2405, Rue de la Terrasse Pavillon Abitibi-Price, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, CanadaCentro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (CIGA-UNAM), Campus Morelia, Michoacán, 58190, MexicoCommunity forest management (CFM) is identified by many actors as a core strategy for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD+). Others however see REDD+ as a danger to CFM. In response to these contrasting views, we carried out a systematic review of CFM case studies to look at CFM’s potential role in achieving forest carbon benefits and social co-benefits for forest communities. We evaluated the potential impacts of REDD+ on CFM. Our review showed that there is strong evidence of CFM’s role in reducing degradation and stabilizing forested landscapes; however, the review also showed less evidence about the role of CFM in reducing deforestation. For social benefits, we found that CFM contributes to livelihoods, but its effect on poverty reduction may be limited. Also, CFM may not deal adequately with the distribution of benefits within communities or user groups. These insights are important for CFM-based REDD+ intervention; measures should be adopted to overcome these gaps. Innovative incentive structures to existing CFM are discussed. The recognition of rights for forest communities is one first step identified in promoting CFM. We call for sound empirical impact evaluations that analyze CFM and CFM-based REDD+ interventions by looking at both biophysical and social outcomes.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/8/170community forest managementreducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+)livelihoodsbenefit sharing |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Johanne Pelletier Nancy Gélinas Margaret Skutsch |
spellingShingle |
Johanne Pelletier Nancy Gélinas Margaret Skutsch The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape Forests community forest management reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) livelihoods benefit sharing |
author_facet |
Johanne Pelletier Nancy Gélinas Margaret Skutsch |
author_sort |
Johanne Pelletier |
title |
The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape |
title_short |
The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape |
title_full |
The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape |
title_fullStr |
The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD+ Landscape |
title_sort |
place of community forest management in the redd+ landscape |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Forests |
issn |
1999-4907 |
publishDate |
2016-08-01 |
description |
Community forest management (CFM) is identified by many actors as a core strategy for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD+). Others however see REDD+ as a danger to CFM. In response to these contrasting views, we carried out a systematic review of CFM case studies to look at CFM’s potential role in achieving forest carbon benefits and social co-benefits for forest communities. We evaluated the potential impacts of REDD+ on CFM. Our review showed that there is strong evidence of CFM’s role in reducing degradation and stabilizing forested landscapes; however, the review also showed less evidence about the role of CFM in reducing deforestation. For social benefits, we found that CFM contributes to livelihoods, but its effect on poverty reduction may be limited. Also, CFM may not deal adequately with the distribution of benefits within communities or user groups. These insights are important for CFM-based REDD+ intervention; measures should be adopted to overcome these gaps. Innovative incentive structures to existing CFM are discussed. The recognition of rights for forest communities is one first step identified in promoting CFM. We call for sound empirical impact evaluations that analyze CFM and CFM-based REDD+ interventions by looking at both biophysical and social outcomes. |
topic |
community forest management reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) livelihoods benefit sharing |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/8/170 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT johannepelletier theplaceofcommunityforestmanagementinthereddlandscape AT nancygelinas theplaceofcommunityforestmanagementinthereddlandscape AT margaretskutsch theplaceofcommunityforestmanagementinthereddlandscape AT johannepelletier placeofcommunityforestmanagementinthereddlandscape AT nancygelinas placeofcommunityforestmanagementinthereddlandscape AT margaretskutsch placeofcommunityforestmanagementinthereddlandscape |
_version_ |
1725730753600290816 |