Mapping do-it-yourself science

Abstract The emergence of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) science movements is becoming a topic widely discussed in academia and policy, as well as by the general public and the media. While DIY approaches enjoy increasing diffusion even in official research, different social actors frequently talk about them...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Federico Ferretti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-01-01
Series:Life Sciences, Society and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40504-018-0090-1
id doaj-b380893a251749de9558f1921d50ff61
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b380893a251749de9558f1921d50ff612020-11-25T02:18:04ZengBMCLife Sciences, Society and Policy2195-78192019-01-0115112310.1186/s40504-018-0090-1Mapping do-it-yourself scienceFederico Ferretti0Joint Research Centre of the European CommissionAbstract The emergence of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) science movements is becoming a topic widely discussed in academia and policy, as well as by the general public and the media. While DIY approaches enjoy increasing diffusion even in official research, different social actors frequently talk about them in different ways and circumstances. Interaction and negotiation processes amongst actors (e.g. policy makers and DIY communities) define the premises upon which different conceptualisations of DIY science are deployed. In this paper we offer a framework for analysing the discourse on DIY science. Our study consists of a field research of three spaces active in DIY science premises, two dedicated events of the DIY community, and an auto-ethnography in the field of DIY biology. By relying on the theory of social worlds/arenas (SW/A), we collected data on how notions of DIY science are constructed by different social actors and how conceptual borders are built or are likely to shift, resulting in multiple possible SW/A mappings. We conclude that each and every conceptualisation of DIY science cannot stand independently from the situatedness of its multiple contexts, therefore making its usage in policy making and governance particularly complex.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40504-018-0090-1DIY scienceSocial worlds/arenas theoryThe maker movement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Federico Ferretti
spellingShingle Federico Ferretti
Mapping do-it-yourself science
Life Sciences, Society and Policy
DIY science
Social worlds/arenas theory
The maker movement
author_facet Federico Ferretti
author_sort Federico Ferretti
title Mapping do-it-yourself science
title_short Mapping do-it-yourself science
title_full Mapping do-it-yourself science
title_fullStr Mapping do-it-yourself science
title_full_unstemmed Mapping do-it-yourself science
title_sort mapping do-it-yourself science
publisher BMC
series Life Sciences, Society and Policy
issn 2195-7819
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Abstract The emergence of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) science movements is becoming a topic widely discussed in academia and policy, as well as by the general public and the media. While DIY approaches enjoy increasing diffusion even in official research, different social actors frequently talk about them in different ways and circumstances. Interaction and negotiation processes amongst actors (e.g. policy makers and DIY communities) define the premises upon which different conceptualisations of DIY science are deployed. In this paper we offer a framework for analysing the discourse on DIY science. Our study consists of a field research of three spaces active in DIY science premises, two dedicated events of the DIY community, and an auto-ethnography in the field of DIY biology. By relying on the theory of social worlds/arenas (SW/A), we collected data on how notions of DIY science are constructed by different social actors and how conceptual borders are built or are likely to shift, resulting in multiple possible SW/A mappings. We conclude that each and every conceptualisation of DIY science cannot stand independently from the situatedness of its multiple contexts, therefore making its usage in policy making and governance particularly complex.
topic DIY science
Social worlds/arenas theory
The maker movement
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40504-018-0090-1
work_keys_str_mv AT federicoferretti mappingdoityourselfscience
_version_ 1724883499599527936