Social sciences and the politics of knowledge: Inculturation and anthropology of knowledge: American orientalism 1945-1970

Social sciences have now contributed to a better understanding of society and different cultural spaces that make up the world basing themselves on disciplines such as anthropology, sociology and history. These disciplines are involved in the development of a cognitive environment which allows us to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nasser Suleiman Gabryel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università degli Studi di Cagliari 2015-06-01
Series:Anuac
Online Access:https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/anuac/article/view/1634
id doaj-b37b33e138c842cc9784848e8ca0d2cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b37b33e138c842cc9784848e8ca0d2cc2021-03-12T13:04:30ZengUniversità degli Studi di CagliariAnuac2239-625X2015-06-012110.7340/anuac2239-625X-701086Social sciences and the politics of knowledge: Inculturation and anthropology of knowledge: American orientalism 1945-1970Nasser Suleiman Gabryel0École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris, FranceSocial sciences have now contributed to a better understanding of society and different cultural spaces that make up the world basing themselves on disciplines such as anthropology, sociology and history. These disciplines are involved in the development of a cognitive environment which allows us to define and delimit Orientalism perceived here as an approach. The purpose of this writing is to compare the organization and ways of Orientalism in two distinct cultural environments (Anglo-Saxon and Arabic) through the analysis of interactions and different structures which preceded its identification. If from the 40s to the 60s showed the emergence of Orientalism as a tool for policy analysis, institutionalization of the scientific community with the establishment of departments of research, growth of foundations roles in funding and policy definition of Area Studies equally sored. This leads us to question the real contribution of Areas Studies in the understanding of the Orient.https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/anuac/article/view/1634
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nasser Suleiman Gabryel
spellingShingle Nasser Suleiman Gabryel
Social sciences and the politics of knowledge: Inculturation and anthropology of knowledge: American orientalism 1945-1970
Anuac
author_facet Nasser Suleiman Gabryel
author_sort Nasser Suleiman Gabryel
title Social sciences and the politics of knowledge: Inculturation and anthropology of knowledge: American orientalism 1945-1970
title_short Social sciences and the politics of knowledge: Inculturation and anthropology of knowledge: American orientalism 1945-1970
title_full Social sciences and the politics of knowledge: Inculturation and anthropology of knowledge: American orientalism 1945-1970
title_fullStr Social sciences and the politics of knowledge: Inculturation and anthropology of knowledge: American orientalism 1945-1970
title_full_unstemmed Social sciences and the politics of knowledge: Inculturation and anthropology of knowledge: American orientalism 1945-1970
title_sort social sciences and the politics of knowledge: inculturation and anthropology of knowledge: american orientalism 1945-1970
publisher Università degli Studi di Cagliari
series Anuac
issn 2239-625X
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Social sciences have now contributed to a better understanding of society and different cultural spaces that make up the world basing themselves on disciplines such as anthropology, sociology and history. These disciplines are involved in the development of a cognitive environment which allows us to define and delimit Orientalism perceived here as an approach. The purpose of this writing is to compare the organization and ways of Orientalism in two distinct cultural environments (Anglo-Saxon and Arabic) through the analysis of interactions and different structures which preceded its identification. If from the 40s to the 60s showed the emergence of Orientalism as a tool for policy analysis, institutionalization of the scientific community with the establishment of departments of research, growth of foundations roles in funding and policy definition of Area Studies equally sored. This leads us to question the real contribution of Areas Studies in the understanding of the Orient.
url https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/anuac/article/view/1634
work_keys_str_mv AT nassersuleimangabryel socialsciencesandthepoliticsofknowledgeinculturationandanthropologyofknowledgeamericanorientalism19451970
_version_ 1724222971639234560