Symptom clusters among cancer survivors: what can machine learning techniques tell us?
Abstract Purpose Knowledge regarding symptom clusters may inform targeted interventions. The current study investigated symptom clusters among cancer survivors, using machine learning techniques on a large data set. Methods Data consisted of self-reports of cancer survivors who used a fully automate...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01352-4 |
id |
doaj-b353b993914b4f90a95dd1c4b03134b3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b353b993914b4f90a95dd1c4b03134b32021-08-22T11:44:21ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882021-08-0121111210.1186/s12874-021-01352-4Symptom clusters among cancer survivors: what can machine learning techniques tell us?Koen I. Neijenhuijs0Carel F. W. Peeters1Henk van Weert2Pim Cuijpers3Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw4Department of Clinical, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam Public HealthDepartment of Clinical, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteDepartment of Clinical, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAbstract Purpose Knowledge regarding symptom clusters may inform targeted interventions. The current study investigated symptom clusters among cancer survivors, using machine learning techniques on a large data set. Methods Data consisted of self-reports of cancer survivors who used a fully automated online application ‘Oncokompas’ that supports them in their self-management. This is done by 1) monitoring their symptoms through patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); and 2) providing a personalized overview of supportive care options tailored to their scores, aiming to reduce symptom burden and improve health-related quality of life. In the present study, data on 26 generic symptoms (physical and psychosocial) were used. Results of the PROM of each symptom are presented to the user as a no well-being risk, moderate well-being risk, or high well-being risk score. Data of 1032 cancer survivors were analysed using Hierarchical Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN) on high risk scores and moderate-to-high risk scores separately. Results When analyzing the high risk scores, seven clusters were extracted: one main cluster which contained most frequently occurring physical and psychosocial symptoms, and six subclusters with different combinations of these symptoms. When analyzing moderate-to-high risk scores, three clusters were extracted: two main clusters were identified, which separated physical symptoms (and their consequences) and psycho-social symptoms, and one subcluster with only body weight issues. Conclusion There appears to be an inherent difference on the co-occurrence of symptoms dependent on symptom severity. Among survivors with high risk scores, the data showed a clustering of more connections between physical and psycho-social symptoms in separate subclusters. Among survivors with moderate-to-high risk scores, we observed less connections in the clustering between physical and psycho-social symptoms.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01352-4CancerOncologySymptom clustersMachine learning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Koen I. Neijenhuijs Carel F. W. Peeters Henk van Weert Pim Cuijpers Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw |
spellingShingle |
Koen I. Neijenhuijs Carel F. W. Peeters Henk van Weert Pim Cuijpers Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw Symptom clusters among cancer survivors: what can machine learning techniques tell us? BMC Medical Research Methodology Cancer Oncology Symptom clusters Machine learning |
author_facet |
Koen I. Neijenhuijs Carel F. W. Peeters Henk van Weert Pim Cuijpers Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw |
author_sort |
Koen I. Neijenhuijs |
title |
Symptom clusters among cancer survivors: what can machine learning techniques tell us? |
title_short |
Symptom clusters among cancer survivors: what can machine learning techniques tell us? |
title_full |
Symptom clusters among cancer survivors: what can machine learning techniques tell us? |
title_fullStr |
Symptom clusters among cancer survivors: what can machine learning techniques tell us? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Symptom clusters among cancer survivors: what can machine learning techniques tell us? |
title_sort |
symptom clusters among cancer survivors: what can machine learning techniques tell us? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medical Research Methodology |
issn |
1471-2288 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Purpose Knowledge regarding symptom clusters may inform targeted interventions. The current study investigated symptom clusters among cancer survivors, using machine learning techniques on a large data set. Methods Data consisted of self-reports of cancer survivors who used a fully automated online application ‘Oncokompas’ that supports them in their self-management. This is done by 1) monitoring their symptoms through patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); and 2) providing a personalized overview of supportive care options tailored to their scores, aiming to reduce symptom burden and improve health-related quality of life. In the present study, data on 26 generic symptoms (physical and psychosocial) were used. Results of the PROM of each symptom are presented to the user as a no well-being risk, moderate well-being risk, or high well-being risk score. Data of 1032 cancer survivors were analysed using Hierarchical Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN) on high risk scores and moderate-to-high risk scores separately. Results When analyzing the high risk scores, seven clusters were extracted: one main cluster which contained most frequently occurring physical and psychosocial symptoms, and six subclusters with different combinations of these symptoms. When analyzing moderate-to-high risk scores, three clusters were extracted: two main clusters were identified, which separated physical symptoms (and their consequences) and psycho-social symptoms, and one subcluster with only body weight issues. Conclusion There appears to be an inherent difference on the co-occurrence of symptoms dependent on symptom severity. Among survivors with high risk scores, the data showed a clustering of more connections between physical and psycho-social symptoms in separate subclusters. Among survivors with moderate-to-high risk scores, we observed less connections in the clustering between physical and psycho-social symptoms. |
topic |
Cancer Oncology Symptom clusters Machine learning |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01352-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT koenineijenhuijs symptomclustersamongcancersurvivorswhatcanmachinelearningtechniquestellus AT carelfwpeeters symptomclustersamongcancersurvivorswhatcanmachinelearningtechniquestellus AT henkvanweert symptomclustersamongcancersurvivorswhatcanmachinelearningtechniquestellus AT pimcuijpers symptomclustersamongcancersurvivorswhatcanmachinelearningtechniquestellus AT irmaverdonckdeleeuw symptomclustersamongcancersurvivorswhatcanmachinelearningtechniquestellus |
_version_ |
1721199461386944512 |