Investigating the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Systematic Risk

Open economy policy and increasing communication among companies has led to their interaction on one another, therefore, the managers are dealing with more uncertainty concerning their basic operations. In order to confront such uncertainty, managers have to use the most appropriate management polic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Reza Nikbakht, Zahra Taheri
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: University of Tehran 2014-04-01
Series:بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_50786_046d5fd8cf77f362be16199c8b4b7c73.pdf
id doaj-b34b0249c72844c997e1f4da57995d81
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b34b0249c72844c997e1f4da57995d812020-11-24T22:08:38Zfas University of Tehranبررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی2645-80202645-80392014-04-0121110912610.22059/acctgrev.2014.5078650786Investigating the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Systematic RiskMohammad Reza Nikbakht0Zahra Taheri1Associate Prof. Faculty of Management, Tehran University, IranPhD Student of Accounting, Faculty of Management, Tehran University, IranOpen economy policy and increasing communication among companies has led to their interaction on one another, therefore, the managers are dealing with more uncertainty concerning their basic operations. In order to confront such uncertainty, managers have to use the most appropriate management policies. This can be done by implementing corporate governance. Theoretically, corporate governance can be used as a means to change systematic risk. This study examines the relationship between corporate governance and systematic risk among firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. In order to realize this aim, the financial information of 154 firms between 2004 and 2011 has been used. The statistical method used for testing the hypotheses is OLS Regression. The Research model has been initially run for the whole data. Then in order to examine each hypothesis more precisely based on the classifications of PerSteve (2011) the model was run in three different categories of firms (firms with beta lower than 0.5 as low-risk, firms with beta between 0/5 & 1 as medium-risk, and firms with beta higher than 1 as high-risk firms). The findings of the research show that there is a significant relationship between the percentage of institutional ownerships as one of the corporate governance elements and systematic risk. There is an inverse relationship between the percentage of other independent directors of firms and systematic risk; however, the relationship in other categories of firms is not significant.https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_50786_046d5fd8cf77f362be16199c8b4b7c73.pdfCorporate Governanceinstitutional ownershipsindependent of directorssystematic risk
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Reza Nikbakht
Zahra Taheri
spellingShingle Mohammad Reza Nikbakht
Zahra Taheri
Investigating the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Systematic Risk
بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی
Corporate Governance
institutional ownerships
independent of directors
systematic risk
author_facet Mohammad Reza Nikbakht
Zahra Taheri
author_sort Mohammad Reza Nikbakht
title Investigating the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Systematic Risk
title_short Investigating the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Systematic Risk
title_full Investigating the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Systematic Risk
title_fullStr Investigating the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Systematic Risk
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Systematic Risk
title_sort investigating the relationship between corporate governance and systematic risk
publisher University of Tehran
series بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی
issn 2645-8020
2645-8039
publishDate 2014-04-01
description Open economy policy and increasing communication among companies has led to their interaction on one another, therefore, the managers are dealing with more uncertainty concerning their basic operations. In order to confront such uncertainty, managers have to use the most appropriate management policies. This can be done by implementing corporate governance. Theoretically, corporate governance can be used as a means to change systematic risk. This study examines the relationship between corporate governance and systematic risk among firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. In order to realize this aim, the financial information of 154 firms between 2004 and 2011 has been used. The statistical method used for testing the hypotheses is OLS Regression. The Research model has been initially run for the whole data. Then in order to examine each hypothesis more precisely based on the classifications of PerSteve (2011) the model was run in three different categories of firms (firms with beta lower than 0.5 as low-risk, firms with beta between 0/5 & 1 as medium-risk, and firms with beta higher than 1 as high-risk firms). The findings of the research show that there is a significant relationship between the percentage of institutional ownerships as one of the corporate governance elements and systematic risk. There is an inverse relationship between the percentage of other independent directors of firms and systematic risk; however, the relationship in other categories of firms is not significant.
topic Corporate Governance
institutional ownerships
independent of directors
systematic risk
url https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_50786_046d5fd8cf77f362be16199c8b4b7c73.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadrezanikbakht investigatingtherelationshipbetweencorporategovernanceandsystematicrisk
AT zahrataheri investigatingtherelationshipbetweencorporategovernanceandsystematicrisk
_version_ 1725815646935056384