id doaj-b33f716689fa4018b3751315ed49ee88
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b33f716689fa4018b3751315ed49ee882020-11-25T02:30:15ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0177e4010110.1371/journal.pone.0040101Job strain and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 140,000 men and women.Katriina HeikkiläSolja T NybergEleonor I FranssonLars AlfredssonDirk De BacquerJakob B BjornerSébastien BonenfantMarianne BorritzHermann BurrEls ClaysAnnalisa CasiniNico DraganoRaimund ErbelGoedele A GeuskensMarcel GoldbergWendela E HooftmanIrene L HoutmanMatti JoensuuKarl-Heinz JöckelFrance KittelAnders KnutssonMarkku KoskenvuoAki KoskinenAnne KouvonenConstanze LeineweberThorsten LunauIda E H MadsenLinda L Magnusson HansonMichael G MarmotMartin L NielsenMaria NordinJaana PenttiPaula SaloReiner RuguliesAndrew SteptoeJohannes SiegristSakari SuominenJussi VahteraMarianna VirtanenAri VäänänenPeter WesterholmHugo WesterlundMarie ZinsTöres TheorellMark HamerJane E FerrieArchana Singh-ManouxG David BattyMika KivimäkiIPD-Work ConsortiumThe relationship between work-related stress and alcohol intake is uncertain. In order to add to the thus far inconsistent evidence from relatively small studies, we conducted individual-participant meta-analyses of the association between work-related stress (operationalised as self-reported job strain) and alcohol intake.We analysed cross-sectional data from 12 European studies (n = 142 140) and longitudinal data from four studies (n = 48 646). Job strain and alcohol intake were self-reported. Job strain was analysed as a binary variable (strain vs. no strain). Alcohol intake was harmonised into the following categories: none, moderate (women: 1-14, men: 1-21 drinks/week), intermediate (women: 15-20, men: 22-27 drinks/week) and heavy (women: >20, men: >27 drinks/week). Cross-sectional associations were modelled using logistic regression and the results pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Longitudinal associations were examined using mixed effects logistic and modified Poisson regression. Compared to moderate drinkers, non-drinkers and (random effects odds ratio (OR): 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.14) and heavy drinkers (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.26) had higher odds of job strain. Intermediate drinkers, on the other hand, had lower odds of job strain (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99). We found no clear evidence for longitudinal associations between job strain and alcohol intake.Our findings suggest that compared to moderate drinkers, non-drinkers and heavy drinkers are more likely and intermediate drinkers less likely to report work-related stress.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3391232?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katriina Heikkilä
Solja T Nyberg
Eleonor I Fransson
Lars Alfredsson
Dirk De Bacquer
Jakob B Bjorner
Sébastien Bonenfant
Marianne Borritz
Hermann Burr
Els Clays
Annalisa Casini
Nico Dragano
Raimund Erbel
Goedele A Geuskens
Marcel Goldberg
Wendela E Hooftman
Irene L Houtman
Matti Joensuu
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
France Kittel
Anders Knutsson
Markku Koskenvuo
Aki Koskinen
Anne Kouvonen
Constanze Leineweber
Thorsten Lunau
Ida E H Madsen
Linda L Magnusson Hanson
Michael G Marmot
Martin L Nielsen
Maria Nordin
Jaana Pentti
Paula Salo
Reiner Rugulies
Andrew Steptoe
Johannes Siegrist
Sakari Suominen
Jussi Vahtera
Marianna Virtanen
Ari Väänänen
Peter Westerholm
Hugo Westerlund
Marie Zins
Töres Theorell
Mark Hamer
Jane E Ferrie
Archana Singh-Manoux
G David Batty
Mika Kivimäki
IPD-Work Consortium
spellingShingle Katriina Heikkilä
Solja T Nyberg
Eleonor I Fransson
Lars Alfredsson
Dirk De Bacquer
Jakob B Bjorner
Sébastien Bonenfant
Marianne Borritz
Hermann Burr
Els Clays
Annalisa Casini
Nico Dragano
Raimund Erbel
Goedele A Geuskens
Marcel Goldberg
Wendela E Hooftman
Irene L Houtman
Matti Joensuu
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
France Kittel
Anders Knutsson
Markku Koskenvuo
Aki Koskinen
Anne Kouvonen
Constanze Leineweber
Thorsten Lunau
Ida E H Madsen
Linda L Magnusson Hanson
Michael G Marmot
Martin L Nielsen
Maria Nordin
Jaana Pentti
Paula Salo
Reiner Rugulies
Andrew Steptoe
Johannes Siegrist
Sakari Suominen
Jussi Vahtera
Marianna Virtanen
Ari Väänänen
Peter Westerholm
Hugo Westerlund
Marie Zins
Töres Theorell
Mark Hamer
Jane E Ferrie
Archana Singh-Manoux
G David Batty
Mika Kivimäki
IPD-Work Consortium
Job strain and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 140,000 men and women.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Katriina Heikkilä
Solja T Nyberg
Eleonor I Fransson
Lars Alfredsson
Dirk De Bacquer
Jakob B Bjorner
Sébastien Bonenfant
Marianne Borritz
Hermann Burr
Els Clays
Annalisa Casini
Nico Dragano
Raimund Erbel
Goedele A Geuskens
Marcel Goldberg
Wendela E Hooftman
Irene L Houtman
Matti Joensuu
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
France Kittel
Anders Knutsson
Markku Koskenvuo
Aki Koskinen
Anne Kouvonen
Constanze Leineweber
Thorsten Lunau
Ida E H Madsen
Linda L Magnusson Hanson
Michael G Marmot
Martin L Nielsen
Maria Nordin
Jaana Pentti
Paula Salo
Reiner Rugulies
Andrew Steptoe
Johannes Siegrist
Sakari Suominen
Jussi Vahtera
Marianna Virtanen
Ari Väänänen
Peter Westerholm
Hugo Westerlund
Marie Zins
Töres Theorell
Mark Hamer
Jane E Ferrie
Archana Singh-Manoux
G David Batty
Mika Kivimäki
IPD-Work Consortium
author_sort Katriina Heikkilä
title Job strain and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 140,000 men and women.
title_short Job strain and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 140,000 men and women.
title_full Job strain and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 140,000 men and women.
title_fullStr Job strain and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 140,000 men and women.
title_full_unstemmed Job strain and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 140,000 men and women.
title_sort job strain and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 140,000 men and women.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description The relationship between work-related stress and alcohol intake is uncertain. In order to add to the thus far inconsistent evidence from relatively small studies, we conducted individual-participant meta-analyses of the association between work-related stress (operationalised as self-reported job strain) and alcohol intake.We analysed cross-sectional data from 12 European studies (n = 142 140) and longitudinal data from four studies (n = 48 646). Job strain and alcohol intake were self-reported. Job strain was analysed as a binary variable (strain vs. no strain). Alcohol intake was harmonised into the following categories: none, moderate (women: 1-14, men: 1-21 drinks/week), intermediate (women: 15-20, men: 22-27 drinks/week) and heavy (women: >20, men: >27 drinks/week). Cross-sectional associations were modelled using logistic regression and the results pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Longitudinal associations were examined using mixed effects logistic and modified Poisson regression. Compared to moderate drinkers, non-drinkers and (random effects odds ratio (OR): 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.14) and heavy drinkers (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.26) had higher odds of job strain. Intermediate drinkers, on the other hand, had lower odds of job strain (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99). We found no clear evidence for longitudinal associations between job strain and alcohol intake.Our findings suggest that compared to moderate drinkers, non-drinkers and heavy drinkers are more likely and intermediate drinkers less likely to report work-related stress.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3391232?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT katriinaheikkila jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT soljatnyberg jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT eleonorifransson jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT larsalfredsson jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT dirkdebacquer jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT jakobbbjorner jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT sebastienbonenfant jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT marianneborritz jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT hermannburr jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT elsclays jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT annalisacasini jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT nicodragano jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT raimunderbel jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT goedeleageuskens jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT marcelgoldberg jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT wendelaehooftman jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT irenelhoutman jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT mattijoensuu jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT karlheinzjockel jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT francekittel jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT andersknutsson jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT markkukoskenvuo jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT akikoskinen jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT annekouvonen jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT constanzeleineweber jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT thorstenlunau jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT idaehmadsen jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT lindalmagnussonhanson jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT michaelgmarmot jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT martinlnielsen jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT marianordin jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT jaanapentti jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT paulasalo jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT reinerrugulies jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT andrewsteptoe jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT johannessiegrist jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT sakarisuominen jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT jussivahtera jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT mariannavirtanen jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT arivaananen jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT peterwesterholm jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT hugowesterlund jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT mariezins jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT torestheorell jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT markhamer jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT janeeferrie jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT archanasinghmanoux jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT gdavidbatty jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT mikakivimaki jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
AT ipdworkconsortium jobstrainandalcoholintakeacollaborativemetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdatafrom140000menandwomen
_version_ 1724829060576575488