Reaction of North American neo-Thomism against the «Intelligent Design»
The doctrine of «Intelligent Design» formulated by Phillip E. Johnson, Michael Behe, William A. Dembski and Stephen C. Meyer is presented as a scientific alternative to neo-Darwinism. For philosophical naturalism or atheism is only a pseudo-science dependent of «Protestant creationism» and the liter...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad Pontificia Comillas
2017-08-01
|
Series: | Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.upcomillas.es/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/8010 |
id |
doaj-b33c70efa061404caf0444d5e0a11555 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b33c70efa061404caf0444d5e0a115552020-11-24T23:06:45ZspaUniversidad Pontificia ComillasPensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica0031-47492386-58222017-08-017327664967110.14422/pen.v73.i276.y2017.0317573Reaction of North American neo-Thomism against the «Intelligent Design»Desiderio Parrilla Martínez0Universidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM)The doctrine of «Intelligent Design» formulated by Phillip E. Johnson, Michael Behe, William A. Dembski and Stephen C. Meyer is presented as a scientific alternative to neo-Darwinism. For philosophical naturalism or atheism is only a pseudo-science dependent of «Protestant creationism» and the literal biblical interpretation. The best philosophical critiques, however, come from American neo-Thomism. This paper presents the main arguments used by the Thomism in his polemic against the doctrine of «Intelligent Design».https://revistas.upcomillas.es/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/8010Tomás de Aquinodiseño inteligentemetafísicafinalidadevolución |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Desiderio Parrilla Martínez |
spellingShingle |
Desiderio Parrilla Martínez Reaction of North American neo-Thomism against the «Intelligent Design» Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica Tomás de Aquino diseño inteligente metafísica finalidad evolución |
author_facet |
Desiderio Parrilla Martínez |
author_sort |
Desiderio Parrilla Martínez |
title |
Reaction of North American neo-Thomism against the «Intelligent Design» |
title_short |
Reaction of North American neo-Thomism against the «Intelligent Design» |
title_full |
Reaction of North American neo-Thomism against the «Intelligent Design» |
title_fullStr |
Reaction of North American neo-Thomism against the «Intelligent Design» |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reaction of North American neo-Thomism against the «Intelligent Design» |
title_sort |
reaction of north american neo-thomism against the «intelligent design» |
publisher |
Universidad Pontificia Comillas |
series |
Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica |
issn |
0031-4749 2386-5822 |
publishDate |
2017-08-01 |
description |
The doctrine of «Intelligent Design» formulated by Phillip E. Johnson, Michael Behe, William A. Dembski and Stephen C. Meyer is presented as a scientific alternative to neo-Darwinism. For philosophical naturalism or atheism is only a pseudo-science dependent of «Protestant creationism» and the literal biblical interpretation. The best philosophical critiques, however, come from American neo-Thomism. This paper presents the main arguments used by the Thomism in his polemic against the doctrine of «Intelligent Design». |
topic |
Tomás de Aquino diseño inteligente metafísica finalidad evolución |
url |
https://revistas.upcomillas.es/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/8010 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT desiderioparrillamartinez reactionofnorthamericanneothomismagainsttheintelligentdesign |
_version_ |
1725621288639135744 |