Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review

Questions: Do interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke? Are any improvements in strength accompanied by improvements in activity? Design: Systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis. Participants: Adults who have had a stroke. Intervention: Any interven...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Davide G de Sousa, Lisa A Harvey, Simone Dorsch, Joanne V Glinsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-10-01
Series:Journal of Physiotherapy
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955318301152
id doaj-b32a8b7f55a54c3aa051185ede254557
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b32a8b7f55a54c3aa051185ede2545572020-11-24T21:14:26ZengElsevierJournal of Physiotherapy1836-95532018-10-01644210221Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic reviewDavide G de Sousa0Lisa A Harvey1Simone Dorsch2Joanne V Glinsky3Graythwaite Rehabilitation Centre, Ryde Hospital; John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute; Sydney Medical School Northern, University of SydneyJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute; Sydney Medical School Northern, University of SydneyFaculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, AustraliaJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute; Sydney Medical School Northern, University of SydneyQuestions: Do interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke? Are any improvements in strength accompanied by improvements in activity? Design: Systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis. Participants: Adults who have had a stroke. Intervention: Any intervention involving repetitive practice compared with no intervention or a sham intervention. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was voluntary strength in muscles trained as part of the intervention. The secondary outcomes were measures of lower limb and upper limb activity. Results: Fifty-two studies were included. The overall SMD of repetitive practice on strength was examined by pooling post-intervention scores from 46 studies involving 1928 participants. The SMD of repetitive practice on strength when the upper and lower limb studies were combined was 0.25 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.34, I2 = 44%) in favour of repetitive practice. Twenty-four studies with a total of 912 participants investigated the effects of repetitive practice on upper limb activity after stroke. The SMD was 0.15 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.29, I2 = 50%) in favour of repetitive practice on upper limb activity. Twenty studies with a total of 952 participants investigated the effects of repetitive practice on lower limb activity after stroke. The SMD was 0.25 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.38, I2 = 36%) in favour of repetitive practice on lower limb activity. Conclusion: Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke, and these improvements are accompanied by improvements in activity. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42017068658. [de Sousa DG, Harvey LA, Dorsch S, Glinsky JV (2018) Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy 64: 210–221] Key words: Stroke, Strength, Repetitive practice, Systematic review, Meta-analysishttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955318301152
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Davide G de Sousa
Lisa A Harvey
Simone Dorsch
Joanne V Glinsky
spellingShingle Davide G de Sousa
Lisa A Harvey
Simone Dorsch
Joanne V Glinsky
Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review
Journal of Physiotherapy
author_facet Davide G de Sousa
Lisa A Harvey
Simone Dorsch
Joanne V Glinsky
author_sort Davide G de Sousa
title Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review
title_short Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review
title_full Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review
title_fullStr Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review
title_sort interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Physiotherapy
issn 1836-9553
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Questions: Do interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke? Are any improvements in strength accompanied by improvements in activity? Design: Systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis. Participants: Adults who have had a stroke. Intervention: Any intervention involving repetitive practice compared with no intervention or a sham intervention. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was voluntary strength in muscles trained as part of the intervention. The secondary outcomes were measures of lower limb and upper limb activity. Results: Fifty-two studies were included. The overall SMD of repetitive practice on strength was examined by pooling post-intervention scores from 46 studies involving 1928 participants. The SMD of repetitive practice on strength when the upper and lower limb studies were combined was 0.25 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.34, I2 = 44%) in favour of repetitive practice. Twenty-four studies with a total of 912 participants investigated the effects of repetitive practice on upper limb activity after stroke. The SMD was 0.15 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.29, I2 = 50%) in favour of repetitive practice on upper limb activity. Twenty studies with a total of 952 participants investigated the effects of repetitive practice on lower limb activity after stroke. The SMD was 0.25 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.38, I2 = 36%) in favour of repetitive practice on lower limb activity. Conclusion: Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke, and these improvements are accompanied by improvements in activity. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42017068658. [de Sousa DG, Harvey LA, Dorsch S, Glinsky JV (2018) Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy 64: 210–221] Key words: Stroke, Strength, Repetitive practice, Systematic review, Meta-analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955318301152
work_keys_str_mv AT davidegdesousa interventionsinvolvingrepetitivepracticeimprovestrengthafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT lisaaharvey interventionsinvolvingrepetitivepracticeimprovestrengthafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT simonedorsch interventionsinvolvingrepetitivepracticeimprovestrengthafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT joannevglinsky interventionsinvolvingrepetitivepracticeimprovestrengthafterstrokeasystematicreview
_version_ 1716747206416924672