Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review
Questions: Do interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke? Are any improvements in strength accompanied by improvements in activity? Design: Systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis. Participants: Adults who have had a stroke. Intervention: Any interven...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Physiotherapy |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955318301152 |
id |
doaj-b32a8b7f55a54c3aa051185ede254557 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b32a8b7f55a54c3aa051185ede2545572020-11-24T21:14:26ZengElsevierJournal of Physiotherapy1836-95532018-10-01644210221Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic reviewDavide G de Sousa0Lisa A Harvey1Simone Dorsch2Joanne V Glinsky3Graythwaite Rehabilitation Centre, Ryde Hospital; John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute; Sydney Medical School Northern, University of SydneyJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute; Sydney Medical School Northern, University of SydneyFaculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, AustraliaJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute; Sydney Medical School Northern, University of SydneyQuestions: Do interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke? Are any improvements in strength accompanied by improvements in activity? Design: Systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis. Participants: Adults who have had a stroke. Intervention: Any intervention involving repetitive practice compared with no intervention or a sham intervention. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was voluntary strength in muscles trained as part of the intervention. The secondary outcomes were measures of lower limb and upper limb activity. Results: Fifty-two studies were included. The overall SMD of repetitive practice on strength was examined by pooling post-intervention scores from 46 studies involving 1928 participants. The SMD of repetitive practice on strength when the upper and lower limb studies were combined was 0.25 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.34, I2 = 44%) in favour of repetitive practice. Twenty-four studies with a total of 912 participants investigated the effects of repetitive practice on upper limb activity after stroke. The SMD was 0.15 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.29, I2 = 50%) in favour of repetitive practice on upper limb activity. Twenty studies with a total of 952 participants investigated the effects of repetitive practice on lower limb activity after stroke. The SMD was 0.25 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.38, I2 = 36%) in favour of repetitive practice on lower limb activity. Conclusion: Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke, and these improvements are accompanied by improvements in activity. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42017068658. [de Sousa DG, Harvey LA, Dorsch S, Glinsky JV (2018) Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy 64: 210–221] Key words: Stroke, Strength, Repetitive practice, Systematic review, Meta-analysishttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955318301152 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Davide G de Sousa Lisa A Harvey Simone Dorsch Joanne V Glinsky |
spellingShingle |
Davide G de Sousa Lisa A Harvey Simone Dorsch Joanne V Glinsky Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review Journal of Physiotherapy |
author_facet |
Davide G de Sousa Lisa A Harvey Simone Dorsch Joanne V Glinsky |
author_sort |
Davide G de Sousa |
title |
Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review |
title_short |
Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review |
title_full |
Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review |
title_sort |
interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Journal of Physiotherapy |
issn |
1836-9553 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
Questions: Do interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke? Are any improvements in strength accompanied by improvements in activity? Design: Systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis. Participants: Adults who have had a stroke. Intervention: Any intervention involving repetitive practice compared with no intervention or a sham intervention. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was voluntary strength in muscles trained as part of the intervention. The secondary outcomes were measures of lower limb and upper limb activity. Results: Fifty-two studies were included. The overall SMD of repetitive practice on strength was examined by pooling post-intervention scores from 46 studies involving 1928 participants. The SMD of repetitive practice on strength when the upper and lower limb studies were combined was 0.25 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.34, I2 = 44%) in favour of repetitive practice. Twenty-four studies with a total of 912 participants investigated the effects of repetitive practice on upper limb activity after stroke. The SMD was 0.15 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.29, I2 = 50%) in favour of repetitive practice on upper limb activity. Twenty studies with a total of 952 participants investigated the effects of repetitive practice on lower limb activity after stroke. The SMD was 0.25 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.38, I2 = 36%) in favour of repetitive practice on lower limb activity. Conclusion: Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke, and these improvements are accompanied by improvements in activity. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42017068658. [de Sousa DG, Harvey LA, Dorsch S, Glinsky JV (2018) Interventions involving repetitive practice improve strength after stroke: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy 64: 210–221] Key words: Stroke, Strength, Repetitive practice, Systematic review, Meta-analysis |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955318301152 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidegdesousa interventionsinvolvingrepetitivepracticeimprovestrengthafterstrokeasystematicreview AT lisaaharvey interventionsinvolvingrepetitivepracticeimprovestrengthafterstrokeasystematicreview AT simonedorsch interventionsinvolvingrepetitivepracticeimprovestrengthafterstrokeasystematicreview AT joannevglinsky interventionsinvolvingrepetitivepracticeimprovestrengthafterstrokeasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1716747206416924672 |