Assessment of robotic patient simulators for training in manual physical therapy examination techniques.

Robots that simulate patients suffering from joint resistance caused by biomechanical and neural impairments are used to aid the training of physical therapists in manual examination techniques. However, there are few methods for assessing such robots. This article proposes two types of assessment m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shun Ishikawa, Shogo Okamoto, Kaoru Isogai, Yasuhiro Akiyama, Naomi Yanagihara, Yoji Yamada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126392
id doaj-b3103ca97ab3436d86ef379fd30e7874
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b3103ca97ab3436d86ef379fd30e78742021-03-03T20:05:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01104e012639210.1371/journal.pone.0126392Assessment of robotic patient simulators for training in manual physical therapy examination techniques.Shun IshikawaShogo OkamotoKaoru IsogaiYasuhiro AkiyamaNaomi YanagiharaYoji YamadaRobots that simulate patients suffering from joint resistance caused by biomechanical and neural impairments are used to aid the training of physical therapists in manual examination techniques. However, there are few methods for assessing such robots. This article proposes two types of assessment measures based on typical judgments of clinicians. One of the measures involves the evaluation of how well the simulator presents different severities of a specified disease. Experienced clinicians were requested to rate the simulated symptoms in terms of severity, and the consistency of their ratings was used as a performance measure. The other measure involves the evaluation of how well the simulator presents different types of symptoms. In this case, the clinicians were requested to classify the simulated resistances in terms of symptom type, and the average ratios of their answers were used as performance measures. For both types of assessment measures, a higher index implied higher agreement among the experienced clinicians that subjectively assessed the symptoms based on typical symptom features. We applied these two assessment methods to a patient knee robot and achieved positive appraisals. The assessment measures have potential for use in comparing several patient simulators for training physical therapists, rather than as absolute indices for developing a standard.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126392
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shun Ishikawa
Shogo Okamoto
Kaoru Isogai
Yasuhiro Akiyama
Naomi Yanagihara
Yoji Yamada
spellingShingle Shun Ishikawa
Shogo Okamoto
Kaoru Isogai
Yasuhiro Akiyama
Naomi Yanagihara
Yoji Yamada
Assessment of robotic patient simulators for training in manual physical therapy examination techniques.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Shun Ishikawa
Shogo Okamoto
Kaoru Isogai
Yasuhiro Akiyama
Naomi Yanagihara
Yoji Yamada
author_sort Shun Ishikawa
title Assessment of robotic patient simulators for training in manual physical therapy examination techniques.
title_short Assessment of robotic patient simulators for training in manual physical therapy examination techniques.
title_full Assessment of robotic patient simulators for training in manual physical therapy examination techniques.
title_fullStr Assessment of robotic patient simulators for training in manual physical therapy examination techniques.
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of robotic patient simulators for training in manual physical therapy examination techniques.
title_sort assessment of robotic patient simulators for training in manual physical therapy examination techniques.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Robots that simulate patients suffering from joint resistance caused by biomechanical and neural impairments are used to aid the training of physical therapists in manual examination techniques. However, there are few methods for assessing such robots. This article proposes two types of assessment measures based on typical judgments of clinicians. One of the measures involves the evaluation of how well the simulator presents different severities of a specified disease. Experienced clinicians were requested to rate the simulated symptoms in terms of severity, and the consistency of their ratings was used as a performance measure. The other measure involves the evaluation of how well the simulator presents different types of symptoms. In this case, the clinicians were requested to classify the simulated resistances in terms of symptom type, and the average ratios of their answers were used as performance measures. For both types of assessment measures, a higher index implied higher agreement among the experienced clinicians that subjectively assessed the symptoms based on typical symptom features. We applied these two assessment methods to a patient knee robot and achieved positive appraisals. The assessment measures have potential for use in comparing several patient simulators for training physical therapists, rather than as absolute indices for developing a standard.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126392
work_keys_str_mv AT shunishikawa assessmentofroboticpatientsimulatorsfortraininginmanualphysicaltherapyexaminationtechniques
AT shogookamoto assessmentofroboticpatientsimulatorsfortraininginmanualphysicaltherapyexaminationtechniques
AT kaoruisogai assessmentofroboticpatientsimulatorsfortraininginmanualphysicaltherapyexaminationtechniques
AT yasuhiroakiyama assessmentofroboticpatientsimulatorsfortraininginmanualphysicaltherapyexaminationtechniques
AT naomiyanagihara assessmentofroboticpatientsimulatorsfortraininginmanualphysicaltherapyexaminationtechniques
AT yojiyamada assessmentofroboticpatientsimulatorsfortraininginmanualphysicaltherapyexaminationtechniques
_version_ 1714824118870736896