Is Critique “Universal”? Swift’s Drapier’s Letters and the Possibility of Universal Public Reason
This article seeks to examine the dimension of “courage” or “risk” involved in the exercise of critique through a genealogical survey in relation to Michel Foucault’s work on Parrhēsia and an examination of Jonathan Swift’s Drapier’s Letters as an exemplar depicting the contours of “norm” in 18th ce...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ratnabali Publisher
2016-02-01
|
Series: | Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry |
Online Access: | http://sanglap-journal.in/index.php/sanglap/article/view/124 |
id |
doaj-b30f9fe1362e4d90b04e8e3a416a8a05 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b30f9fe1362e4d90b04e8e3a416a8a052020-11-25T01:40:06ZengRatnabali PublisherSanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry2349-80642016-02-0122123Is Critique “Universal”? Swift’s Drapier’s Letters and the Possibility of Universal Public ReasonSuvendu Ghatak0Jadavpur UniversityThis article seeks to examine the dimension of “courage” or “risk” involved in the exercise of critique through a genealogical survey in relation to Michel Foucault’s work on Parrhēsia and an examination of Jonathan Swift’s Drapier’s Letters as an exemplar depicting the contours of “norm” in 18th century public discourse. The tension between norm, truth and freedom of speech would be brought out to examine the censorship, intrinsic to the foundation of universal public reason that is pointed out by Judith Butler in her critique of the Habermasian model of public discourse. The vocabulary of public discourse will be assessed to understand whether a universal normativity can at all be achieved. Keywords: Swift; Parrhēsia; Censorship; Critique; Habermas; Foucault; Butler; Asad.http://sanglap-journal.in/index.php/sanglap/article/view/124 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Suvendu Ghatak |
spellingShingle |
Suvendu Ghatak Is Critique “Universal”? Swift’s Drapier’s Letters and the Possibility of Universal Public Reason Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry |
author_facet |
Suvendu Ghatak |
author_sort |
Suvendu Ghatak |
title |
Is Critique “Universal”? Swift’s Drapier’s Letters and the Possibility of Universal Public Reason |
title_short |
Is Critique “Universal”? Swift’s Drapier’s Letters and the Possibility of Universal Public Reason |
title_full |
Is Critique “Universal”? Swift’s Drapier’s Letters and the Possibility of Universal Public Reason |
title_fullStr |
Is Critique “Universal”? Swift’s Drapier’s Letters and the Possibility of Universal Public Reason |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is Critique “Universal”? Swift’s Drapier’s Letters and the Possibility of Universal Public Reason |
title_sort |
is critique “universal”? swift’s drapier’s letters and the possibility of universal public reason |
publisher |
Ratnabali Publisher |
series |
Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry |
issn |
2349-8064 |
publishDate |
2016-02-01 |
description |
This article seeks to examine the dimension of “courage” or “risk” involved in the exercise of critique through a genealogical survey in relation to Michel Foucault’s work on Parrhēsia and an examination of Jonathan Swift’s Drapier’s Letters as an exemplar depicting the contours of “norm” in 18th century public discourse. The tension between norm, truth and freedom of speech would be brought out to examine the censorship, intrinsic to the foundation of universal public reason that is pointed out by Judith Butler in her critique of the Habermasian model of public discourse. The vocabulary of public discourse will be assessed to understand whether a universal normativity can at all be achieved.
Keywords: Swift; Parrhēsia; Censorship; Critique; Habermas; Foucault; Butler; Asad. |
url |
http://sanglap-journal.in/index.php/sanglap/article/view/124 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT suvendughatak iscritiqueuniversalswiftsdrapierslettersandthepossibilityofuniversalpublicreason |
_version_ |
1725047204688691200 |