The Effects of Insufflation Conditions on Rat Mesothelium

Aim. The aim of this investigation was to examine the alterations in the peritoneum after cold dry CO2, heated dry CO2, and humidified heated CO2 at pressures equivalent to intraperitoneal pressures used in human laparoscopy. Methods. Eighteen rats were divided into 4 treatment groups—group 1: untre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew K. Davey, Jessica Hayward, Jean K. Marshall, Anthony E. Woods
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:International Journal of Inflammation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/816283
id doaj-b30e79d4f6d0463ca7c9909acd531242
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b30e79d4f6d0463ca7c9909acd5312422020-11-24T22:40:45ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Inflammation2090-80402042-00992013-01-01201310.1155/2013/816283816283The Effects of Insufflation Conditions on Rat MesotheliumAndrew K. Davey0Jessica Hayward1Jean K. Marshall2Anthony E. Woods3Research Centre for the Molecular Basis of Disease, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, AustraliaFisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited, 15 Maurice Paykel Road, East Tamaki, Auckland 2013, New ZealandFisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited, 15 Maurice Paykel Road, East Tamaki, Auckland 2013, New ZealandSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, AustraliaAim. The aim of this investigation was to examine the alterations in the peritoneum after cold dry CO2, heated dry CO2, and humidified heated CO2 at pressures equivalent to intraperitoneal pressures used in human laparoscopy. Methods. Eighteen rats were divided into 4 treatment groups—group 1: untreated control; group 2: insufflation with cold dry CO2; group 3: insufflation with heated, dry CO2; group 4: insufflation with heated and humidified CO2. The abdomen was insufflated to 5 mm/Hg (flow rate 50 mL/min) for 2 h. Twelve hours later, tissue samples were collected for analysis by light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results. Group 1: no abnormalities were detected. Group 2: specimens revealed an inflammatory response with loss of mesothelium and mesothelial cell nuclei showing lytic change. Cells were rounded with some areas of cell flattening and separation. Group 3: some animals showed little or no alteration, while others had a mild inflammatory response. Mesothelial cells were rounded and showed crenation on the exposed surface. Group 4: specimens showed little change from the control group. Conclusions. The LM results indicate that insufflations with heated, humidified CO2 are the least likely to induce mesothelial damage.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/816283
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew K. Davey
Jessica Hayward
Jean K. Marshall
Anthony E. Woods
spellingShingle Andrew K. Davey
Jessica Hayward
Jean K. Marshall
Anthony E. Woods
The Effects of Insufflation Conditions on Rat Mesothelium
International Journal of Inflammation
author_facet Andrew K. Davey
Jessica Hayward
Jean K. Marshall
Anthony E. Woods
author_sort Andrew K. Davey
title The Effects of Insufflation Conditions on Rat Mesothelium
title_short The Effects of Insufflation Conditions on Rat Mesothelium
title_full The Effects of Insufflation Conditions on Rat Mesothelium
title_fullStr The Effects of Insufflation Conditions on Rat Mesothelium
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Insufflation Conditions on Rat Mesothelium
title_sort effects of insufflation conditions on rat mesothelium
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Inflammation
issn 2090-8040
2042-0099
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Aim. The aim of this investigation was to examine the alterations in the peritoneum after cold dry CO2, heated dry CO2, and humidified heated CO2 at pressures equivalent to intraperitoneal pressures used in human laparoscopy. Methods. Eighteen rats were divided into 4 treatment groups—group 1: untreated control; group 2: insufflation with cold dry CO2; group 3: insufflation with heated, dry CO2; group 4: insufflation with heated and humidified CO2. The abdomen was insufflated to 5 mm/Hg (flow rate 50 mL/min) for 2 h. Twelve hours later, tissue samples were collected for analysis by light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results. Group 1: no abnormalities were detected. Group 2: specimens revealed an inflammatory response with loss of mesothelium and mesothelial cell nuclei showing lytic change. Cells were rounded with some areas of cell flattening and separation. Group 3: some animals showed little or no alteration, while others had a mild inflammatory response. Mesothelial cells were rounded and showed crenation on the exposed surface. Group 4: specimens showed little change from the control group. Conclusions. The LM results indicate that insufflations with heated, humidified CO2 are the least likely to induce mesothelial damage.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/816283
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewkdavey theeffectsofinsufflationconditionsonratmesothelium
AT jessicahayward theeffectsofinsufflationconditionsonratmesothelium
AT jeankmarshall theeffectsofinsufflationconditionsonratmesothelium
AT anthonyewoods theeffectsofinsufflationconditionsonratmesothelium
AT andrewkdavey effectsofinsufflationconditionsonratmesothelium
AT jessicahayward effectsofinsufflationconditionsonratmesothelium
AT jeankmarshall effectsofinsufflationconditionsonratmesothelium
AT anthonyewoods effectsofinsufflationconditionsonratmesothelium
_version_ 1725703586235547648