Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study

Objective: This FEM study was conducted to quantify the amount of torque loss in maxillary anterior teeth by applying force vectors from different levels to the anterior retraction hook at various heights and comparing with that of molar anchorage system. Materials and Methods: Five 3D FEM model...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abhishek Parashar, Kaladhar Reddy Aileni, Madhukar Reddy Rachala, Nagam Reddy Shashidhar, Vankre Mallikarjun, Nupur Parik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2014-12-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5353/10099_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(AJAK)_PFA(AK)_PFA2(AK)_PFA3(AK).pdf
id doaj-b2fe05428fa640b5883acace0b2baed6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b2fe05428fa640b5883acace0b2baed62020-11-25T03:49:54ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2014-12-01812ZC77ZC8010.7860/JCDR/2014/10099.5353Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM StudyAbhishek Parashar0Kaladhar Reddy Aileni1Madhukar Reddy Rachala2Nagam Reddy Shashidhar3Vankre Mallikarjun4Nupur Parik5Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Jodhpur Dental College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry AL-JOUF UNIVERSITY, Sakaka Al-Jouf ProvinceKingdom of Saudi Arabia.Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Svs Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India. Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Svs Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India.Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Svs Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India.Clinician, C-111, Bangur Avenue, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.Objective: This FEM study was conducted to quantify the amount of torque loss in maxillary anterior teeth by applying force vectors from different levels to the anterior retraction hook at various heights and comparing with that of molar anchorage system. Materials and Methods: Five 3D FEM models were constructed with force vectors at different levels: HOT-High Orthodontic Traction (13.5mm from archwire) to ARH1 – Anterior Retraction Hook (5mm), HOT to ARH2 (8mm), LOT- Low Orthodontic Traction (8 mm) to ARH1 , LOT to ARH2 and from conventional molar hook to ARH1 . Mini-implants were placed buccally between the roots of second premolar and first molar. Torque loss was calculated by measuring the displacement of the teeth at crown tip and root apex in two planes i.e. sagittal and vertical using Y and Z axis respectively in all the five models. The results were statistically analyzed by using Kruskal Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: HOT to ARH1 showed that the anterior teeth moved bodily (p =0.5127), followed by molar hook - ARH1 (p=0.0495*) which showed mild uncontrolled tipping. Whereas the HOTARH2, LOT - ARH1,and LOT - ARH2 models exhibited uncontrolled tipping with maximum torque loss in LOT - ARH1 (p=0.0001*). Conclusion: It can be concluded that bodily movement with very minimal torque loss was observed in HOT-ARH1 model whereas the maximum torque loss was recorded in LOT-ARH2 model. Conventional molar anchorage group showed uncontrolled tipping with some amount of extrusion and anchor loss of posteriors.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5353/10099_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(AJAK)_PFA(AK)_PFA2(AK)_PFA3(AK).pdfanterior retraction hooken-masse retractionfinite element methodmini-implantstorque loss
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abhishek Parashar
Kaladhar Reddy Aileni
Madhukar Reddy Rachala
Nagam Reddy Shashidhar
Vankre Mallikarjun
Nupur Parik
spellingShingle Abhishek Parashar
Kaladhar Reddy Aileni
Madhukar Reddy Rachala
Nagam Reddy Shashidhar
Vankre Mallikarjun
Nupur Parik
Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
anterior retraction hook
en-masse retraction
finite element method
mini-implants
torque loss
author_facet Abhishek Parashar
Kaladhar Reddy Aileni
Madhukar Reddy Rachala
Nagam Reddy Shashidhar
Vankre Mallikarjun
Nupur Parik
author_sort Abhishek Parashar
title Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study
title_short Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study
title_full Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study
title_fullStr Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study
title_full_unstemmed Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study
title_sort torque loss in en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using miniimplants with force vectors at different levels: 3d fem study
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Objective: This FEM study was conducted to quantify the amount of torque loss in maxillary anterior teeth by applying force vectors from different levels to the anterior retraction hook at various heights and comparing with that of molar anchorage system. Materials and Methods: Five 3D FEM models were constructed with force vectors at different levels: HOT-High Orthodontic Traction (13.5mm from archwire) to ARH1 – Anterior Retraction Hook (5mm), HOT to ARH2 (8mm), LOT- Low Orthodontic Traction (8 mm) to ARH1 , LOT to ARH2 and from conventional molar hook to ARH1 . Mini-implants were placed buccally between the roots of second premolar and first molar. Torque loss was calculated by measuring the displacement of the teeth at crown tip and root apex in two planes i.e. sagittal and vertical using Y and Z axis respectively in all the five models. The results were statistically analyzed by using Kruskal Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: HOT to ARH1 showed that the anterior teeth moved bodily (p =0.5127), followed by molar hook - ARH1 (p=0.0495*) which showed mild uncontrolled tipping. Whereas the HOTARH2, LOT - ARH1,and LOT - ARH2 models exhibited uncontrolled tipping with maximum torque loss in LOT - ARH1 (p=0.0001*). Conclusion: It can be concluded that bodily movement with very minimal torque loss was observed in HOT-ARH1 model whereas the maximum torque loss was recorded in LOT-ARH2 model. Conventional molar anchorage group showed uncontrolled tipping with some amount of extrusion and anchor loss of posteriors.
topic anterior retraction hook
en-masse retraction
finite element method
mini-implants
torque loss
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5353/10099_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(AJAK)_PFA(AK)_PFA2(AK)_PFA3(AK).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abhishekparashar torquelossinenmasseretractionofmaxillaryanteriorteethusingminiimplantswithforcevectorsatdifferentlevels3dfemstudy
AT kaladharreddyaileni torquelossinenmasseretractionofmaxillaryanteriorteethusingminiimplantswithforcevectorsatdifferentlevels3dfemstudy
AT madhukarreddyrachala torquelossinenmasseretractionofmaxillaryanteriorteethusingminiimplantswithforcevectorsatdifferentlevels3dfemstudy
AT nagamreddyshashidhar torquelossinenmasseretractionofmaxillaryanteriorteethusingminiimplantswithforcevectorsatdifferentlevels3dfemstudy
AT vankremallikarjun torquelossinenmasseretractionofmaxillaryanteriorteethusingminiimplantswithforcevectorsatdifferentlevels3dfemstudy
AT nupurparik torquelossinenmasseretractionofmaxillaryanteriorteethusingminiimplantswithforcevectorsatdifferentlevels3dfemstudy
_version_ 1724493349272944640