Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study
Objective: This FEM study was conducted to quantify the amount of torque loss in maxillary anterior teeth by applying force vectors from different levels to the anterior retraction hook at various heights and comparing with that of molar anchorage system. Materials and Methods: Five 3D FEM model...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5353/10099_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(AJAK)_PFA(AK)_PFA2(AK)_PFA3(AK).pdf |
id |
doaj-b2fe05428fa640b5883acace0b2baed6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b2fe05428fa640b5883acace0b2baed62020-11-25T03:49:54ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2014-12-01812ZC77ZC8010.7860/JCDR/2014/10099.5353Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM StudyAbhishek Parashar0Kaladhar Reddy Aileni1Madhukar Reddy Rachala2Nagam Reddy Shashidhar3Vankre Mallikarjun4Nupur Parik5Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Jodhpur Dental College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry AL-JOUF UNIVERSITY, Sakaka Al-Jouf ProvinceKingdom of Saudi Arabia.Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Svs Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India. Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Svs Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India.Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Svs Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India.Clinician, C-111, Bangur Avenue, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.Objective: This FEM study was conducted to quantify the amount of torque loss in maxillary anterior teeth by applying force vectors from different levels to the anterior retraction hook at various heights and comparing with that of molar anchorage system. Materials and Methods: Five 3D FEM models were constructed with force vectors at different levels: HOT-High Orthodontic Traction (13.5mm from archwire) to ARH1 – Anterior Retraction Hook (5mm), HOT to ARH2 (8mm), LOT- Low Orthodontic Traction (8 mm) to ARH1 , LOT to ARH2 and from conventional molar hook to ARH1 . Mini-implants were placed buccally between the roots of second premolar and first molar. Torque loss was calculated by measuring the displacement of the teeth at crown tip and root apex in two planes i.e. sagittal and vertical using Y and Z axis respectively in all the five models. The results were statistically analyzed by using Kruskal Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: HOT to ARH1 showed that the anterior teeth moved bodily (p =0.5127), followed by molar hook - ARH1 (p=0.0495*) which showed mild uncontrolled tipping. Whereas the HOTARH2, LOT - ARH1,and LOT - ARH2 models exhibited uncontrolled tipping with maximum torque loss in LOT - ARH1 (p=0.0001*). Conclusion: It can be concluded that bodily movement with very minimal torque loss was observed in HOT-ARH1 model whereas the maximum torque loss was recorded in LOT-ARH2 model. Conventional molar anchorage group showed uncontrolled tipping with some amount of extrusion and anchor loss of posteriors.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5353/10099_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(AJAK)_PFA(AK)_PFA2(AK)_PFA3(AK).pdfanterior retraction hooken-masse retractionfinite element methodmini-implantstorque loss |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Abhishek Parashar Kaladhar Reddy Aileni Madhukar Reddy Rachala Nagam Reddy Shashidhar Vankre Mallikarjun Nupur Parik |
spellingShingle |
Abhishek Parashar Kaladhar Reddy Aileni Madhukar Reddy Rachala Nagam Reddy Shashidhar Vankre Mallikarjun Nupur Parik Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research anterior retraction hook en-masse retraction finite element method mini-implants torque loss |
author_facet |
Abhishek Parashar Kaladhar Reddy Aileni Madhukar Reddy Rachala Nagam Reddy Shashidhar Vankre Mallikarjun Nupur Parik |
author_sort |
Abhishek Parashar |
title |
Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study |
title_short |
Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study |
title_full |
Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study |
title_fullStr |
Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study |
title_sort |
torque loss in en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using miniimplants with force vectors at different levels: 3d fem study |
publisher |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited |
series |
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
issn |
2249-782X 0973-709X |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
Objective: This FEM study was conducted to quantify the amount
of torque loss in maxillary anterior teeth by applying force vectors
from different levels to the anterior retraction hook at various
heights and comparing with that of molar anchorage system.
Materials and Methods: Five 3D FEM models were constructed
with force vectors at different levels: HOT-High Orthodontic Traction
(13.5mm from archwire) to ARH1
– Anterior Retraction Hook (5mm),
HOT to ARH2 (8mm), LOT- Low Orthodontic Traction (8 mm) to
ARH1
, LOT to ARH2 and from conventional molar hook to ARH1
.
Mini-implants were placed buccally between the roots of second
premolar and first molar. Torque loss was calculated by measuring
the displacement of the teeth at crown tip and root apex in two
planes i.e. sagittal and vertical using Y and Z axis respectively
in all the five models. The results were statistically analyzed by
using Kruskal Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test.
Results: HOT to ARH1 showed that the anterior teeth moved
bodily (p =0.5127), followed by molar hook - ARH1
(p=0.0495*)
which showed mild uncontrolled tipping. Whereas the HOTARH2, LOT - ARH1,and LOT - ARH2 models exhibited uncontrolled
tipping with maximum torque loss in LOT - ARH1 (p=0.0001*).
Conclusion: It can be concluded that bodily movement with very
minimal torque loss was observed in HOT-ARH1
model whereas
the maximum torque loss was recorded in LOT-ARH2
model.
Conventional molar anchorage group showed uncontrolled
tipping with some amount of extrusion and anchor loss of
posteriors. |
topic |
anterior retraction hook en-masse retraction finite element method mini-implants torque loss |
url |
https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5353/10099_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(AJAK)_PFA(AK)_PFA2(AK)_PFA3(AK).pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT abhishekparashar torquelossinenmasseretractionofmaxillaryanteriorteethusingminiimplantswithforcevectorsatdifferentlevels3dfemstudy AT kaladharreddyaileni torquelossinenmasseretractionofmaxillaryanteriorteethusingminiimplantswithforcevectorsatdifferentlevels3dfemstudy AT madhukarreddyrachala torquelossinenmasseretractionofmaxillaryanteriorteethusingminiimplantswithforcevectorsatdifferentlevels3dfemstudy AT nagamreddyshashidhar torquelossinenmasseretractionofmaxillaryanteriorteethusingminiimplantswithforcevectorsatdifferentlevels3dfemstudy AT vankremallikarjun torquelossinenmasseretractionofmaxillaryanteriorteethusingminiimplantswithforcevectorsatdifferentlevels3dfemstudy AT nupurparik torquelossinenmasseretractionofmaxillaryanteriorteethusingminiimplantswithforcevectorsatdifferentlevels3dfemstudy |
_version_ |
1724493349272944640 |