Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study
Objective: This FEM study was conducted to quantify the amount of torque loss in maxillary anterior teeth by applying force vectors from different levels to the anterior retraction hook at various heights and comparing with that of molar anchorage system. Materials and Methods: Five 3D FEM model...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5353/10099_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(AJAK)_PFA(AK)_PFA2(AK)_PFA3(AK).pdf |
Summary: | Objective: This FEM study was conducted to quantify the amount
of torque loss in maxillary anterior teeth by applying force vectors
from different levels to the anterior retraction hook at various
heights and comparing with that of molar anchorage system.
Materials and Methods: Five 3D FEM models were constructed
with force vectors at different levels: HOT-High Orthodontic Traction
(13.5mm from archwire) to ARH1
– Anterior Retraction Hook (5mm),
HOT to ARH2 (8mm), LOT- Low Orthodontic Traction (8 mm) to
ARH1
, LOT to ARH2 and from conventional molar hook to ARH1
.
Mini-implants were placed buccally between the roots of second
premolar and first molar. Torque loss was calculated by measuring
the displacement of the teeth at crown tip and root apex in two
planes i.e. sagittal and vertical using Y and Z axis respectively
in all the five models. The results were statistically analyzed by
using Kruskal Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test.
Results: HOT to ARH1 showed that the anterior teeth moved
bodily (p =0.5127), followed by molar hook - ARH1
(p=0.0495*)
which showed mild uncontrolled tipping. Whereas the HOTARH2, LOT - ARH1,and LOT - ARH2 models exhibited uncontrolled
tipping with maximum torque loss in LOT - ARH1 (p=0.0001*).
Conclusion: It can be concluded that bodily movement with very
minimal torque loss was observed in HOT-ARH1
model whereas
the maximum torque loss was recorded in LOT-ARH2
model.
Conventional molar anchorage group showed uncontrolled
tipping with some amount of extrusion and anchor loss of
posteriors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2249-782X 0973-709X |