Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures
In a previous study, we investigated slow cortical potential (SCP) N1-P2 amplitudes and N1 latencies in aided and unaided conditions, with the finding that despite being set to provide 20 or 40 dB of gain, none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in SCP response amplitude relative to...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2012-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Otolaryngology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/386542 |
id |
doaj-b2fbc2828b9a4c45b547ce2951676613 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b2fbc2828b9a4c45b547ce29516766132020-11-24T21:32:20ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Otolaryngology1687-92011687-921X2012-01-01201210.1155/2012/386542386542Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic MeasuresLorienne M. Jenstad0Susan Marynewich1David R. Stapells2School of Audiology and Speech Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaSchool of Audiology and Speech Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaSchool of Audiology and Speech Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaIn a previous study, we investigated slow cortical potential (SCP) N1-P2 amplitudes and N1 latencies in aided and unaided conditions, with the finding that despite being set to provide 20 or 40 dB of gain, none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in SCP response amplitude relative to the unaided (Marynewich et al., in press). The current study investigates the effects of hearing-aid processing on acoustic measures for two 1000-Hz tonal stimuli: short (60 ms) and long (757 ms), presented at three intensities (30, 50, 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, DigitalB) with two gain settings (20, 40 dB). Acoustic results indicate that gain achieved by the hearing aids, measured at 30 ms after stimulus onset, for both the short and long stimuli, was less than real-ear insertion gain measured with standard hearing aid test signals. Additionally, the digital hearing aids altered the rise time of the stimuli such that maximum gain was reached well past 30 ms after stimulus onset; rise times differed between the digital aids. These results indicate that aided SCP results must be cautiously interpreted and that further research is required for clinical application.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/386542 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lorienne M. Jenstad Susan Marynewich David R. Stapells |
spellingShingle |
Lorienne M. Jenstad Susan Marynewich David R. Stapells Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures International Journal of Otolaryngology |
author_facet |
Lorienne M. Jenstad Susan Marynewich David R. Stapells |
author_sort |
Lorienne M. Jenstad |
title |
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures |
title_short |
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures |
title_full |
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures |
title_fullStr |
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures |
title_sort |
slow cortical potentials and amplification—part ii: acoustic measures |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
International Journal of Otolaryngology |
issn |
1687-9201 1687-921X |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
In a previous study, we investigated slow cortical potential (SCP) N1-P2 amplitudes and N1 latencies in aided and unaided conditions, with the finding that despite being set to provide 20 or 40 dB of gain, none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in SCP response amplitude relative to the unaided (Marynewich et al., in press). The current study investigates the effects of hearing-aid processing on acoustic measures for two 1000-Hz tonal stimuli: short (60 ms) and long (757 ms), presented at three intensities (30, 50, 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, DigitalB) with two gain settings (20, 40 dB). Acoustic results indicate that gain achieved by the hearing aids, measured at 30 ms after stimulus onset, for both the short and long stimuli, was less than real-ear insertion gain measured with standard hearing aid test signals. Additionally, the digital hearing aids altered the rise time of the stimuli such that maximum gain was reached well past 30 ms after stimulus onset; rise times differed between the digital aids. These results indicate that aided SCP results must be cautiously interpreted and that further research is required for clinical application. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/386542 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT loriennemjenstad slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartiiacousticmeasures AT susanmarynewich slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartiiacousticmeasures AT davidrstapells slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartiiacousticmeasures |
_version_ |
1725958193295654912 |