Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures

In a previous study, we investigated slow cortical potential (SCP) N1-P2 amplitudes and N1 latencies in aided and unaided conditions, with the finding that despite being set to provide 20 or 40 dB of gain, none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in SCP response amplitude relative to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lorienne M. Jenstad, Susan Marynewich, David R. Stapells
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Otolaryngology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/386542
id doaj-b2fbc2828b9a4c45b547ce2951676613
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b2fbc2828b9a4c45b547ce29516766132020-11-24T21:32:20ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Otolaryngology1687-92011687-921X2012-01-01201210.1155/2012/386542386542Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic MeasuresLorienne M. Jenstad0Susan Marynewich1David R. Stapells2School of Audiology and Speech Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaSchool of Audiology and Speech Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaSchool of Audiology and Speech Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaIn a previous study, we investigated slow cortical potential (SCP) N1-P2 amplitudes and N1 latencies in aided and unaided conditions, with the finding that despite being set to provide 20 or 40 dB of gain, none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in SCP response amplitude relative to the unaided (Marynewich et al., in press). The current study investigates the effects of hearing-aid processing on acoustic measures for two 1000-Hz tonal stimuli: short (60 ms) and long (757 ms), presented at three intensities (30, 50, 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, DigitalB) with two gain settings (20, 40 dB). Acoustic results indicate that gain achieved by the hearing aids, measured at 30 ms after stimulus onset, for both the short and long stimuli, was less than real-ear insertion gain measured with standard hearing aid test signals. Additionally, the digital hearing aids altered the rise time of the stimuli such that maximum gain was reached well past 30 ms after stimulus onset; rise times differed between the digital aids. These results indicate that aided SCP results must be cautiously interpreted and that further research is required for clinical application.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/386542
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lorienne M. Jenstad
Susan Marynewich
David R. Stapells
spellingShingle Lorienne M. Jenstad
Susan Marynewich
David R. Stapells
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures
International Journal of Otolaryngology
author_facet Lorienne M. Jenstad
Susan Marynewich
David R. Stapells
author_sort Lorienne M. Jenstad
title Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures
title_short Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures
title_full Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures
title_fullStr Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures
title_full_unstemmed Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures
title_sort slow cortical potentials and amplification—part ii: acoustic measures
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Otolaryngology
issn 1687-9201
1687-921X
publishDate 2012-01-01
description In a previous study, we investigated slow cortical potential (SCP) N1-P2 amplitudes and N1 latencies in aided and unaided conditions, with the finding that despite being set to provide 20 or 40 dB of gain, none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in SCP response amplitude relative to the unaided (Marynewich et al., in press). The current study investigates the effects of hearing-aid processing on acoustic measures for two 1000-Hz tonal stimuli: short (60 ms) and long (757 ms), presented at three intensities (30, 50, 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, DigitalB) with two gain settings (20, 40 dB). Acoustic results indicate that gain achieved by the hearing aids, measured at 30 ms after stimulus onset, for both the short and long stimuli, was less than real-ear insertion gain measured with standard hearing aid test signals. Additionally, the digital hearing aids altered the rise time of the stimuli such that maximum gain was reached well past 30 ms after stimulus onset; rise times differed between the digital aids. These results indicate that aided SCP results must be cautiously interpreted and that further research is required for clinical application.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/386542
work_keys_str_mv AT loriennemjenstad slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartiiacousticmeasures
AT susanmarynewich slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartiiacousticmeasures
AT davidrstapells slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartiiacousticmeasures
_version_ 1725958193295654912