“Syntaktische Wortfelder”: von den “wesenhaften edeutungsbeziehungen” über die “Kollokationen” und “Selektionsbeschränkungen” bis zu den “lexikalischen Solidaritäten”

The possibilities for combining words with other words are traditionally considered from a syntactic point of view. W. Porzig was the first linguist to draw attention, in 1934, to the fact that syntagmatic combinability has not only to do with grammatical characteristics, but also with aspects of me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sibilla Cantarini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDUCatt 2008-05-01
Series:L'Analisi linguistica e letteraria
Online Access:http://www.analisilinguisticaeletteraria.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/200701CantariniC.pdf
id doaj-b2f125389b244b4cba6f3aa9e2c411ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b2f125389b244b4cba6f3aa9e2c411ee2020-11-25T01:06:07ZengEDUCattL'Analisi linguistica e letteraria1122-19171827-79852008-05-014766“Syntaktische Wortfelder”: von den “wesenhaften edeutungsbeziehungen” über die “Kollokationen” und “Selektionsbeschränkungen” bis zu den “lexikalischen Solidaritäten”Sibilla CantariniThe possibilities for combining words with other words are traditionally considered from a syntactic point of view. W. Porzig was the first linguist to draw attention, in 1934, to the fact that syntagmatic combinability has not only to do with grammatical characteristics, but also with aspects of meaning. For the syntagmatic lexical relations he describes, W. Porzig introduces the term wesenha!e Bedeutungsbeziehungen. The study of these syntagmatic a&nities was neglected for a long period. Only in the 1950s and 1960s did the concept reappear in various theoretical approaches and under different names. The present article illustrates, in detail, the fundamental distinctions that characterize syntagmatic lexical relations in the various approaches after W. Porzig’s Wesenhafte Bedeutungsbeziehungen and points out that his ideas can still be considered very modern, however, from many points of view, not completely developed.http://www.analisilinguisticaeletteraria.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/200701CantariniC.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sibilla Cantarini
spellingShingle Sibilla Cantarini
“Syntaktische Wortfelder”: von den “wesenhaften edeutungsbeziehungen” über die “Kollokationen” und “Selektionsbeschränkungen” bis zu den “lexikalischen Solidaritäten”
L'Analisi linguistica e letteraria
author_facet Sibilla Cantarini
author_sort Sibilla Cantarini
title “Syntaktische Wortfelder”: von den “wesenhaften edeutungsbeziehungen” über die “Kollokationen” und “Selektionsbeschränkungen” bis zu den “lexikalischen Solidaritäten”
title_short “Syntaktische Wortfelder”: von den “wesenhaften edeutungsbeziehungen” über die “Kollokationen” und “Selektionsbeschränkungen” bis zu den “lexikalischen Solidaritäten”
title_full “Syntaktische Wortfelder”: von den “wesenhaften edeutungsbeziehungen” über die “Kollokationen” und “Selektionsbeschränkungen” bis zu den “lexikalischen Solidaritäten”
title_fullStr “Syntaktische Wortfelder”: von den “wesenhaften edeutungsbeziehungen” über die “Kollokationen” und “Selektionsbeschränkungen” bis zu den “lexikalischen Solidaritäten”
title_full_unstemmed “Syntaktische Wortfelder”: von den “wesenhaften edeutungsbeziehungen” über die “Kollokationen” und “Selektionsbeschränkungen” bis zu den “lexikalischen Solidaritäten”
title_sort “syntaktische wortfelder”: von den “wesenhaften edeutungsbeziehungen” über die “kollokationen” und “selektionsbeschränkungen” bis zu den “lexikalischen solidaritäten”
publisher EDUCatt
series L'Analisi linguistica e letteraria
issn 1122-1917
1827-7985
publishDate 2008-05-01
description The possibilities for combining words with other words are traditionally considered from a syntactic point of view. W. Porzig was the first linguist to draw attention, in 1934, to the fact that syntagmatic combinability has not only to do with grammatical characteristics, but also with aspects of meaning. For the syntagmatic lexical relations he describes, W. Porzig introduces the term wesenha!e Bedeutungsbeziehungen. The study of these syntagmatic a&nities was neglected for a long period. Only in the 1950s and 1960s did the concept reappear in various theoretical approaches and under different names. The present article illustrates, in detail, the fundamental distinctions that characterize syntagmatic lexical relations in the various approaches after W. Porzig’s Wesenhafte Bedeutungsbeziehungen and points out that his ideas can still be considered very modern, however, from many points of view, not completely developed.
url http://www.analisilinguisticaeletteraria.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/200701CantariniC.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sibillacantarini syntaktischewortfeldervondenwesenhaftenedeutungsbeziehungenuberdiekollokationenundselektionsbeschrankungenbiszudenlexikalischensolidaritaten
_version_ 1725191340649611264