Decentralizing democracy: approaches to consensus within blockchain communities
Creating fair, transparent and genuinely democratic modes of decentralized decision-making has been a key concern for many developers and users of blockchains. This article evaluates several popular methods of maintaining consensus and achieving decentralized decision-making on blockchain networks...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Revista Teknokultura |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/64523 |
id |
doaj-b2edaaed2aba4489a6ae204104121246 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b2edaaed2aba4489a6ae2041041212462021-06-07T09:00:17ZengUniversidad Complutense de MadridRevista Teknokultura1549-22302019-10-0116210.5209/tekn.6452364523Decentralizing democracy: approaches to consensus within blockchain communitiesChristopher Tozzi Creating fair, transparent and genuinely democratic modes of decentralized decision-making has been a key concern for many developers and users of blockchains. This article evaluates several popular methods of maintaining consensus and achieving decentralized decision-making on blockchain networks in order to assess the extent to which blockchains challenge the norms of the liberal-democratic order. In particular, it compares and contrasts Proof-of-Work, Proof-of-Stake and Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance consensus mechanisms, assessing not just how they operate in a technical sense but also (and most important) the political, economic and social dimensions of these different blockchain governance strategies. This comparison highlights efforts by blockchain communities to redefine or push the bounds of democracy, as well as the challenges they have faced in their efforts to create digital democracies that do not reproduce the same economic and social inequalities present in traditional democratic systems. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/64523bitcoindemocracygovernanceProof-of-Work |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Christopher Tozzi |
spellingShingle |
Christopher Tozzi Decentralizing democracy: approaches to consensus within blockchain communities Revista Teknokultura bitcoin democracy governance Proof-of-Work |
author_facet |
Christopher Tozzi |
author_sort |
Christopher Tozzi |
title |
Decentralizing democracy: approaches to consensus within blockchain communities |
title_short |
Decentralizing democracy: approaches to consensus within blockchain communities |
title_full |
Decentralizing democracy: approaches to consensus within blockchain communities |
title_fullStr |
Decentralizing democracy: approaches to consensus within blockchain communities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Decentralizing democracy: approaches to consensus within blockchain communities |
title_sort |
decentralizing democracy: approaches to consensus within blockchain communities |
publisher |
Universidad Complutense de Madrid |
series |
Revista Teknokultura |
issn |
1549-2230 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Creating fair, transparent and genuinely democratic modes of decentralized decision-making has been a key concern for many developers and users of blockchains. This article evaluates several popular methods of maintaining consensus and achieving decentralized decision-making on blockchain networks in order to assess the extent to which blockchains challenge the norms of the liberal-democratic order. In particular, it compares and contrasts Proof-of-Work, Proof-of-Stake and Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance consensus mechanisms, assessing not just how they operate in a technical sense but also (and most important) the political, economic and social dimensions of these different blockchain governance strategies. This comparison highlights efforts by blockchain communities to redefine or push the bounds of democracy, as well as the challenges they have faced in their efforts to create digital democracies that do not reproduce the same economic and social inequalities present in traditional democratic systems.
|
topic |
bitcoin democracy governance Proof-of-Work |
url |
https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/64523 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christophertozzi decentralizingdemocracyapproachestoconsensuswithinblockchaincommunities |
_version_ |
1721391415373594624 |