Timescales of motor memory formation in dual-adaptation.

The timescales of adaptation to novel dynamics are well explained by a dual-rate model with slow and fast states. This model can predict interference, savings and spontaneous recovery, but cannot account for adaptation to multiple tasks, as each new task drives unlearning of the previously learned t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marion Forano, David W Franklin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-10-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008373
id doaj-b2e5ba2fa34b4b909118dfb4f548da61
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b2e5ba2fa34b4b909118dfb4f548da612021-04-21T15:44:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582020-10-011610e100837310.1371/journal.pcbi.1008373Timescales of motor memory formation in dual-adaptation.Marion ForanoDavid W FranklinThe timescales of adaptation to novel dynamics are well explained by a dual-rate model with slow and fast states. This model can predict interference, savings and spontaneous recovery, but cannot account for adaptation to multiple tasks, as each new task drives unlearning of the previously learned task. Nevertheless, in the presence of appropriate contextual cues, humans are able to adapt simultaneously to opposing dynamics. Consequently this model was expanded, suggesting that dual-adaptation occurs through a single fast process and multiple slow processes. However, such a model does not predict spontaneous recovery within dual-adaptation. Here we assess the existence of multiple fast processes by examining the presence of spontaneous recovery in two experimental variations of an adaptation-de-adaptation-error-clamp paradigm within dual-task adaptation in humans. In both experiments, evidence for spontaneous recovery towards the initially learned dynamics (A) was found in the error-clamp phase, invalidating the one-fast-two-slow dual-rate model. However, as adaptation is not only constrained to two timescales, we fit twelve multi-rate models to the experimental data. BIC model comparison again supported the existence of two fast processes, but extended the timescales to include a third rate: the ultraslow process. Even within our single day experiment, we found little evidence for decay of the learned memory over several hundred error-clamp trials. Overall, we show that dual-adaptation can be best explained by a two-fast-triple-rate model over the timescales of adaptation studied here. Longer term learning may require even slower timescales, explaining why we never forget how to ride a bicycle.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008373
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marion Forano
David W Franklin
spellingShingle Marion Forano
David W Franklin
Timescales of motor memory formation in dual-adaptation.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Marion Forano
David W Franklin
author_sort Marion Forano
title Timescales of motor memory formation in dual-adaptation.
title_short Timescales of motor memory formation in dual-adaptation.
title_full Timescales of motor memory formation in dual-adaptation.
title_fullStr Timescales of motor memory formation in dual-adaptation.
title_full_unstemmed Timescales of motor memory formation in dual-adaptation.
title_sort timescales of motor memory formation in dual-adaptation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2020-10-01
description The timescales of adaptation to novel dynamics are well explained by a dual-rate model with slow and fast states. This model can predict interference, savings and spontaneous recovery, but cannot account for adaptation to multiple tasks, as each new task drives unlearning of the previously learned task. Nevertheless, in the presence of appropriate contextual cues, humans are able to adapt simultaneously to opposing dynamics. Consequently this model was expanded, suggesting that dual-adaptation occurs through a single fast process and multiple slow processes. However, such a model does not predict spontaneous recovery within dual-adaptation. Here we assess the existence of multiple fast processes by examining the presence of spontaneous recovery in two experimental variations of an adaptation-de-adaptation-error-clamp paradigm within dual-task adaptation in humans. In both experiments, evidence for spontaneous recovery towards the initially learned dynamics (A) was found in the error-clamp phase, invalidating the one-fast-two-slow dual-rate model. However, as adaptation is not only constrained to two timescales, we fit twelve multi-rate models to the experimental data. BIC model comparison again supported the existence of two fast processes, but extended the timescales to include a third rate: the ultraslow process. Even within our single day experiment, we found little evidence for decay of the learned memory over several hundred error-clamp trials. Overall, we show that dual-adaptation can be best explained by a two-fast-triple-rate model over the timescales of adaptation studied here. Longer term learning may require even slower timescales, explaining why we never forget how to ride a bicycle.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008373
work_keys_str_mv AT marionforano timescalesofmotormemoryformationindualadaptation
AT davidwfranklin timescalesofmotormemoryformationindualadaptation
_version_ 1714667056355344384