Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out.
Data-driven and machine learning based approaches for detecting, categorising and measuring abusive content such as hate speech and harassment have gained traction due to their scalability, robustness and increasingly high performance. Making effective detection systems for abusive content relies on...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243300 |
id |
doaj-b2e02becbe40469eb7a70c290af75b10 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b2e02becbe40469eb7a70c290af75b102021-03-04T12:49:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011512e024330010.1371/journal.pone.0243300Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out.Bertie VidgenLeon DerczynskiData-driven and machine learning based approaches for detecting, categorising and measuring abusive content such as hate speech and harassment have gained traction due to their scalability, robustness and increasingly high performance. Making effective detection systems for abusive content relies on having the right training datasets, reflecting a widely accepted mantra in computer science: Garbage In, Garbage Out. However, creating training datasets which are large, varied, theoretically-informed and that minimize biases is difficult, laborious and requires deep expertise. This paper systematically reviews 63 publicly available training datasets which have been created to train abusive language classifiers. It also reports on creation of a dedicated website for cataloguing abusive language data hatespeechdata.com. We discuss the challenges and opportunities of open science in this field, and argue that although more dataset sharing would bring many benefits it also poses social and ethical risks which need careful consideration. Finally, we provide evidence-based recommendations for practitioners creating new abusive content training datasets.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243300 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bertie Vidgen Leon Derczynski |
spellingShingle |
Bertie Vidgen Leon Derczynski Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Bertie Vidgen Leon Derczynski |
author_sort |
Bertie Vidgen |
title |
Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out. |
title_short |
Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out. |
title_full |
Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out. |
title_fullStr |
Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out. |
title_sort |
directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: garbage in, garbage out. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Data-driven and machine learning based approaches for detecting, categorising and measuring abusive content such as hate speech and harassment have gained traction due to their scalability, robustness and increasingly high performance. Making effective detection systems for abusive content relies on having the right training datasets, reflecting a widely accepted mantra in computer science: Garbage In, Garbage Out. However, creating training datasets which are large, varied, theoretically-informed and that minimize biases is difficult, laborious and requires deep expertise. This paper systematically reviews 63 publicly available training datasets which have been created to train abusive language classifiers. It also reports on creation of a dedicated website for cataloguing abusive language data hatespeechdata.com. We discuss the challenges and opportunities of open science in this field, and argue that although more dataset sharing would bring many benefits it also poses social and ethical risks which need careful consideration. Finally, we provide evidence-based recommendations for practitioners creating new abusive content training datasets. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243300 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bertievidgen directionsinabusivelanguagetrainingdataasystematicreviewgarbageingarbageout AT leonderczynski directionsinabusivelanguagetrainingdataasystematicreviewgarbageingarbageout |
_version_ |
1714801470877990912 |