Segmentation protocols in the digital twins of monumental heritage: a methodological development

<p>The paper shows an advancement of the research that the authors have been carrying out in recent years in semantic structuring of digital architectural representations field, with a focus on the issue of uncertainty of annotations.<br />The studies carried out in this regard have show...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valeria Cera, Massimiliano Campi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of L'Aquila 2021-06-01
Series:Disegnare con
Subjects:
Online Access:http://disegnarecon.univaq.it/ojs/index.php/disegnarecon/article/view/832
id doaj-b2c63a55640945b6bbb9c79873dd9f01
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b2c63a55640945b6bbb9c79873dd9f012021-07-14T13:58:25ZengUniversity of L'AquilaDisegnare con1828-59612021-06-011426114372Segmentation protocols in the digital twins of monumental heritage: a methodological developmentValeria Cera0Massimiliano Campi1Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, ItalyDepartment of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, Italy<p>The paper shows an advancement of the research that the authors have been carrying out in recent years in semantic structuring of digital architectural representations field, with a focus on the issue of uncertainty of annotations.<br />The studies carried out in this regard have shown how the domain experts specialization determines a vision and interpretation of the same architectural object that we could define "categorized". The interest was, then, in verifying which categories of experts have a greater degree of agreement in classifying and segmenting architectural elements, to highlight which specializations contribute the most in enriching the semantic reasoning about such forms. <br />Aiming to broaden this reasoning, the research was deepened with annotation sessions concerning architecture examples that didn’t correspond to the classical orders rule but included wider fields of historical heritage (from sacred to fortified architecture). The aim is to verify whether the uncertainty of annotation is actually ascribable to a specific segment of the historical heritage, for example: the classical world, or whether the question is broader and as such in needs deeper thinking.</p><p>DOI: https://doi.org/10.20365/disegnarecon.26.2021.14</p>http://disegnarecon.univaq.it/ojs/index.php/disegnarecon/article/view/832semantic annotationuncertainty of segmentation3d cultural heritage segmentation3d point cloud classification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valeria Cera
Massimiliano Campi
spellingShingle Valeria Cera
Massimiliano Campi
Segmentation protocols in the digital twins of monumental heritage: a methodological development
Disegnare con
semantic annotation
uncertainty of segmentation
3d cultural heritage segmentation
3d point cloud classification
author_facet Valeria Cera
Massimiliano Campi
author_sort Valeria Cera
title Segmentation protocols in the digital twins of monumental heritage: a methodological development
title_short Segmentation protocols in the digital twins of monumental heritage: a methodological development
title_full Segmentation protocols in the digital twins of monumental heritage: a methodological development
title_fullStr Segmentation protocols in the digital twins of monumental heritage: a methodological development
title_full_unstemmed Segmentation protocols in the digital twins of monumental heritage: a methodological development
title_sort segmentation protocols in the digital twins of monumental heritage: a methodological development
publisher University of L'Aquila
series Disegnare con
issn 1828-5961
publishDate 2021-06-01
description <p>The paper shows an advancement of the research that the authors have been carrying out in recent years in semantic structuring of digital architectural representations field, with a focus on the issue of uncertainty of annotations.<br />The studies carried out in this regard have shown how the domain experts specialization determines a vision and interpretation of the same architectural object that we could define "categorized". The interest was, then, in verifying which categories of experts have a greater degree of agreement in classifying and segmenting architectural elements, to highlight which specializations contribute the most in enriching the semantic reasoning about such forms. <br />Aiming to broaden this reasoning, the research was deepened with annotation sessions concerning architecture examples that didn’t correspond to the classical orders rule but included wider fields of historical heritage (from sacred to fortified architecture). The aim is to verify whether the uncertainty of annotation is actually ascribable to a specific segment of the historical heritage, for example: the classical world, or whether the question is broader and as such in needs deeper thinking.</p><p>DOI: https://doi.org/10.20365/disegnarecon.26.2021.14</p>
topic semantic annotation
uncertainty of segmentation
3d cultural heritage segmentation
3d point cloud classification
url http://disegnarecon.univaq.it/ojs/index.php/disegnarecon/article/view/832
work_keys_str_mv AT valeriacera segmentationprotocolsinthedigitaltwinsofmonumentalheritageamethodologicaldevelopment
AT massimilianocampi segmentationprotocolsinthedigitaltwinsofmonumentalheritageamethodologicaldevelopment
_version_ 1721302590689378304