Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare human papillomavirus based cervical cancer screening in community-health campaigns versus health facilities in western Kenya

Abstract Background Despite guidelines for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource countries, a very small proportion of women in these settings undergo screening, and even fewer women are successfully treated. Using pilot data from western Kenya and World Health Organization recommendations, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megan J. Huchko, James G. Kahn, Jennifer S. Smith, Robert A. Hiatt, Craig R. Cohen, Elizabeth Bukusi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-12-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-017-3818-z
id doaj-b2b561fa82d0442cab1b39a2dd579b2a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b2b561fa82d0442cab1b39a2dd579b2a2020-11-25T01:52:54ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072017-12-0117111210.1186/s12885-017-3818-zStudy protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare human papillomavirus based cervical cancer screening in community-health campaigns versus health facilities in western KenyaMegan J. Huchko0James G. Kahn1Jennifer S. Smith2Robert A. Hiatt3Craig R. Cohen4Elizabeth Bukusi5Duke University, Global Health Institute and Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San FranciscoDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North CarolinaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San FranciscoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of CaliforniaKenya Medical Research Institute, Center for Microbiology ResearchAbstract Background Despite guidelines for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource countries, a very small proportion of women in these settings undergo screening, and even fewer women are successfully treated. Using pilot data from western Kenya and World Health Organization recommendations, we developed a protocol to implement evidence-based cervical cancer screening and linkage to treatment strategies to the rural communities. We describe the protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare two implementation strategies for human-papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening program using metrics described in the RE-AIM (reach, efficacy, adaption, implementation and maintenance) framework. Methods The study is a three-year, two-phase cluster-randomized trial in 18 communities in western Kenya. During Phase 1, six control communities were offered screening in health facilities; and six intervention communities were offered screening in community health campaigns. Screening was done with human-papillomavirus testing through self-collected specimens. Phase 1 ended and we are working in partnership with communities to further contextualize the implementation strategy for screening, and develop an enhanced linkage to treatment plan. This plan will be tested in an additional six communities in Phase 2 (enhanced intervention). We will compare the reach, efficacy, cost-effectiveness and adaptability of the implementation strategies. Discussion Effective low-cost cervical cancer prevention technologies are becoming more widely available in low- and middle-income countries. Despite increasing government support for cervical cancer prevention, there remains a sizeable gap in service availability. We will use implementation science to identify the most effective strategies to fill this gap through development of context-specific evidence-based solutions. This protocol design and results can help guide implementation of cervical cancer screening in similar settings, where women are most underserved and at highest risk for disease. Trial registration This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02124252 .http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-017-3818-zCervical cancer screeningCommunity health campaignsKenyaHPV self-collectionImplementation science
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Megan J. Huchko
James G. Kahn
Jennifer S. Smith
Robert A. Hiatt
Craig R. Cohen
Elizabeth Bukusi
spellingShingle Megan J. Huchko
James G. Kahn
Jennifer S. Smith
Robert A. Hiatt
Craig R. Cohen
Elizabeth Bukusi
Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare human papillomavirus based cervical cancer screening in community-health campaigns versus health facilities in western Kenya
BMC Cancer
Cervical cancer screening
Community health campaigns
Kenya
HPV self-collection
Implementation science
author_facet Megan J. Huchko
James G. Kahn
Jennifer S. Smith
Robert A. Hiatt
Craig R. Cohen
Elizabeth Bukusi
author_sort Megan J. Huchko
title Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare human papillomavirus based cervical cancer screening in community-health campaigns versus health facilities in western Kenya
title_short Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare human papillomavirus based cervical cancer screening in community-health campaigns versus health facilities in western Kenya
title_full Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare human papillomavirus based cervical cancer screening in community-health campaigns versus health facilities in western Kenya
title_fullStr Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare human papillomavirus based cervical cancer screening in community-health campaigns versus health facilities in western Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare human papillomavirus based cervical cancer screening in community-health campaigns versus health facilities in western Kenya
title_sort study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare human papillomavirus based cervical cancer screening in community-health campaigns versus health facilities in western kenya
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Abstract Background Despite guidelines for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource countries, a very small proportion of women in these settings undergo screening, and even fewer women are successfully treated. Using pilot data from western Kenya and World Health Organization recommendations, we developed a protocol to implement evidence-based cervical cancer screening and linkage to treatment strategies to the rural communities. We describe the protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare two implementation strategies for human-papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening program using metrics described in the RE-AIM (reach, efficacy, adaption, implementation and maintenance) framework. Methods The study is a three-year, two-phase cluster-randomized trial in 18 communities in western Kenya. During Phase 1, six control communities were offered screening in health facilities; and six intervention communities were offered screening in community health campaigns. Screening was done with human-papillomavirus testing through self-collected specimens. Phase 1 ended and we are working in partnership with communities to further contextualize the implementation strategy for screening, and develop an enhanced linkage to treatment plan. This plan will be tested in an additional six communities in Phase 2 (enhanced intervention). We will compare the reach, efficacy, cost-effectiveness and adaptability of the implementation strategies. Discussion Effective low-cost cervical cancer prevention technologies are becoming more widely available in low- and middle-income countries. Despite increasing government support for cervical cancer prevention, there remains a sizeable gap in service availability. We will use implementation science to identify the most effective strategies to fill this gap through development of context-specific evidence-based solutions. This protocol design and results can help guide implementation of cervical cancer screening in similar settings, where women are most underserved and at highest risk for disease. Trial registration This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02124252 .
topic Cervical cancer screening
Community health campaigns
Kenya
HPV self-collection
Implementation science
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-017-3818-z
work_keys_str_mv AT meganjhuchko studyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialtocomparehumanpapillomavirusbasedcervicalcancerscreeningincommunityhealthcampaignsversushealthfacilitiesinwesternkenya
AT jamesgkahn studyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialtocomparehumanpapillomavirusbasedcervicalcancerscreeningincommunityhealthcampaignsversushealthfacilitiesinwesternkenya
AT jenniferssmith studyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialtocomparehumanpapillomavirusbasedcervicalcancerscreeningincommunityhealthcampaignsversushealthfacilitiesinwesternkenya
AT robertahiatt studyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialtocomparehumanpapillomavirusbasedcervicalcancerscreeningincommunityhealthcampaignsversushealthfacilitiesinwesternkenya
AT craigrcohen studyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialtocomparehumanpapillomavirusbasedcervicalcancerscreeningincommunityhealthcampaignsversushealthfacilitiesinwesternkenya
AT elizabethbukusi studyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrialtocomparehumanpapillomavirusbasedcervicalcancerscreeningincommunityhealthcampaignsversushealthfacilitiesinwesternkenya
_version_ 1724992199202963456