Attributed Favourable Relevance and Argument Evaluation
I criticize a case made by George Bowles for a certain theory pertaining to the evaluation of arguments on which the (degree of) attributed favourable relevance of an argument's premises to its conclusion is relevant to its evaluation, but nevertheless argue that such favourable relevance is in...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
1996-01-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2379 |
id |
doaj-b2b0f71498244ad8b94232cea4341e18 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b2b0f71498244ad8b94232cea4341e182020-11-25T03:00:58ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X1996-01-0118210.22329/il.v18i2.2379Attributed Favourable Relevance and Argument EvaluationDerek AllenI criticize a case made by George Bowles for a certain theory pertaining to the evaluation of arguments on which the (degree of) attributed favourable relevance of an argument's premises to its conclusion is relevant to its evaluation, but nevertheless argue that such favourable relevance is indeed relevant to an argument's evaluation.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2379argumentactual (attributed) favourable relevance (conclusive or inconclusive) of an argument's premises to its conclusionGeorge Bowlesgood argumentative reasoningpremise-conclusion relationproposition associated with an argument |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Derek Allen |
spellingShingle |
Derek Allen Attributed Favourable Relevance and Argument Evaluation Informal Logic argument actual (attributed) favourable relevance (conclusive or inconclusive) of an argument's premises to its conclusion George Bowles good argumentative reasoning premise-conclusion relation proposition associated with an argument |
author_facet |
Derek Allen |
author_sort |
Derek Allen |
title |
Attributed Favourable Relevance and Argument Evaluation |
title_short |
Attributed Favourable Relevance and Argument Evaluation |
title_full |
Attributed Favourable Relevance and Argument Evaluation |
title_fullStr |
Attributed Favourable Relevance and Argument Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Attributed Favourable Relevance and Argument Evaluation |
title_sort |
attributed favourable relevance and argument evaluation |
publisher |
University of Windsor |
series |
Informal Logic |
issn |
0824-2577 2293-734X |
publishDate |
1996-01-01 |
description |
I criticize a case made by George Bowles for a certain theory pertaining to the evaluation of arguments on which the (degree of) attributed favourable relevance of an argument's premises to its conclusion is relevant to its evaluation, but nevertheless argue that such favourable relevance is indeed
relevant to an argument's evaluation. |
topic |
argument actual (attributed) favourable relevance (conclusive or inconclusive) of an argument's premises to its conclusion George Bowles good argumentative reasoning premise-conclusion relation proposition associated with an argument |
url |
https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2379 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT derekallen attributedfavourablerelevanceandargumentevaluation |
_version_ |
1724695684001562624 |