Evaluating the Accuracy of Magnetospheric Magnetic Field Models Using Cluster Spacecraft Magnetic Field Measurements

Magnetic fields in the inner magnetosphere can be obtained as vector sums of the Earth’s own internal magnetic field and magnetic fields stemming from currents flowing in the space plasma. While the Earth’s internal magnetic field is accurately described by the International Geomagnetic Reference Fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: František Němec, Marie Kotková
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Universe
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/7/8/282
id doaj-b2a33070633a49a9a3a92828db59bec4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b2a33070633a49a9a3a92828db59bec42021-08-26T14:25:20ZengMDPI AGUniverse2218-19972021-08-01728228210.3390/universe7080282Evaluating the Accuracy of Magnetospheric Magnetic Field Models Using Cluster Spacecraft Magnetic Field MeasurementsFrantišek Němec0Marie Kotková1Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 18000 Prague, Czech RepublicFaculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 18000 Prague, Czech RepublicMagnetic fields in the inner magnetosphere can be obtained as vector sums of the Earth’s own internal magnetic field and magnetic fields stemming from currents flowing in the space plasma. While the Earth’s internal magnetic field is accurately described by the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) model, the characterization of the external magnetic fields is significantly more complicated, as they are highly variable and dependent on the actual level of the geomagnetic activity. Tsyganenko family magnetic field models (T89, T96, T01, TA15B, TA15N), parameterized by the geomagnetic activity level and solar wind parameters, are often used by the involved community to describe these fields. In the present paper, we use a large dataset (2001–2018) of magnetospheric magnetic field measurements obtained by the four Cluster spacecraft to assess the accuracy of these models. We show that, while the newer models (T01, TA15B, TA15N) perform significantly better than the old ones (T89, T96), there remain some systematic deviations, in particular at larger latitudes. Moreover, we compare the locations of the min-B equator determined using the four-point Cluster spacecraft measurements with the locations determined using the magnetic field models. We demonstrate that, despite the newer models being comparatively slightly more accurate, an uncertainty of about one degree in the latitude of the min-B equator remains.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/7/8/282magnetospheremagnetic field modelsCluster spacecraft
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author František Němec
Marie Kotková
spellingShingle František Němec
Marie Kotková
Evaluating the Accuracy of Magnetospheric Magnetic Field Models Using Cluster Spacecraft Magnetic Field Measurements
Universe
magnetosphere
magnetic field models
Cluster spacecraft
author_facet František Němec
Marie Kotková
author_sort František Němec
title Evaluating the Accuracy of Magnetospheric Magnetic Field Models Using Cluster Spacecraft Magnetic Field Measurements
title_short Evaluating the Accuracy of Magnetospheric Magnetic Field Models Using Cluster Spacecraft Magnetic Field Measurements
title_full Evaluating the Accuracy of Magnetospheric Magnetic Field Models Using Cluster Spacecraft Magnetic Field Measurements
title_fullStr Evaluating the Accuracy of Magnetospheric Magnetic Field Models Using Cluster Spacecraft Magnetic Field Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Accuracy of Magnetospheric Magnetic Field Models Using Cluster Spacecraft Magnetic Field Measurements
title_sort evaluating the accuracy of magnetospheric magnetic field models using cluster spacecraft magnetic field measurements
publisher MDPI AG
series Universe
issn 2218-1997
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Magnetic fields in the inner magnetosphere can be obtained as vector sums of the Earth’s own internal magnetic field and magnetic fields stemming from currents flowing in the space plasma. While the Earth’s internal magnetic field is accurately described by the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) model, the characterization of the external magnetic fields is significantly more complicated, as they are highly variable and dependent on the actual level of the geomagnetic activity. Tsyganenko family magnetic field models (T89, T96, T01, TA15B, TA15N), parameterized by the geomagnetic activity level and solar wind parameters, are often used by the involved community to describe these fields. In the present paper, we use a large dataset (2001–2018) of magnetospheric magnetic field measurements obtained by the four Cluster spacecraft to assess the accuracy of these models. We show that, while the newer models (T01, TA15B, TA15N) perform significantly better than the old ones (T89, T96), there remain some systematic deviations, in particular at larger latitudes. Moreover, we compare the locations of the min-B equator determined using the four-point Cluster spacecraft measurements with the locations determined using the magnetic field models. We demonstrate that, despite the newer models being comparatively slightly more accurate, an uncertainty of about one degree in the latitude of the min-B equator remains.
topic magnetosphere
magnetic field models
Cluster spacecraft
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/7/8/282
work_keys_str_mv AT frantiseknemec evaluatingtheaccuracyofmagnetosphericmagneticfieldmodelsusingclusterspacecraftmagneticfieldmeasurements
AT mariekotkova evaluatingtheaccuracyofmagnetosphericmagneticfieldmodelsusingclusterspacecraftmagneticfieldmeasurements
_version_ 1721189624722751488