Is there a Competition between Functional and Situational Affordances during Action Initiation with Everyday Tools?

Most studies of human-tool interactions focus on the typical use of a tool (e.g., cutting in the case of a knife). However, little is known about situations requiring atypical tool use (e.g., using a knife to tighten a screw). The present study focused on a selection of atypical uses of everyday too...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kévin Roche, Hanna Chainay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01073/full
id doaj-b298fb62762045aaa161583d85aa054f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b298fb62762045aaa161583d85aa054f2020-11-25T00:36:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782017-06-01810.3389/fpsyg.2017.01073256065Is there a Competition between Functional and Situational Affordances during Action Initiation with Everyday Tools?Kévin Roche0Kévin Roche1Hanna Chainay2Département Marketing, Grenoble Ecole de ManagementGrenoble, FranceLaboratoire EMC, Université Lumière Lyon 2Lyon, FranceLaboratoire EMC, Université Lumière Lyon 2Lyon, FranceMost studies of human-tool interactions focus on the typical use of a tool (e.g., cutting in the case of a knife). However, little is known about situations requiring atypical tool use (e.g., using a knife to tighten a screw). The present study focused on a selection of atypical uses of everyday tools which might be in conflict with their typical use. Our objective was to study how tool function influences the selection of the relevant action. In Experiment 1, which involved visuomotor priming, two everyday tools (a knife and a screwdriver) and two neutral tools (two bars, with no strong functional affordance) were used as primes and targets. Participants had to use the target with the appropriate box (indicated by the color) that allowed to make an action. Longer initiation times were observed when the prime was an everyday tool, irrespective of the nature of the target. We therefore observed a conflict between functional and situational affordances. To investigate whether the priming effect is caused by the task-irrelevance of the prime, we asked the participants in Experiment 2 to perform an action associated with the prime. The results showed longer initiation times only when the prime and target were everyday tools, irrespective of their precise nature. This suggests that activation of the typical use of a tool might not be fully automatic but flexible depending on the situation.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01073/fullvisuomotor primingtool usetool functionatypical tool useaffordance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kévin Roche
Kévin Roche
Hanna Chainay
spellingShingle Kévin Roche
Kévin Roche
Hanna Chainay
Is there a Competition between Functional and Situational Affordances during Action Initiation with Everyday Tools?
Frontiers in Psychology
visuomotor priming
tool use
tool function
atypical tool use
affordance
author_facet Kévin Roche
Kévin Roche
Hanna Chainay
author_sort Kévin Roche
title Is there a Competition between Functional and Situational Affordances during Action Initiation with Everyday Tools?
title_short Is there a Competition between Functional and Situational Affordances during Action Initiation with Everyday Tools?
title_full Is there a Competition between Functional and Situational Affordances during Action Initiation with Everyday Tools?
title_fullStr Is there a Competition between Functional and Situational Affordances during Action Initiation with Everyday Tools?
title_full_unstemmed Is there a Competition between Functional and Situational Affordances during Action Initiation with Everyday Tools?
title_sort is there a competition between functional and situational affordances during action initiation with everyday tools?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Most studies of human-tool interactions focus on the typical use of a tool (e.g., cutting in the case of a knife). However, little is known about situations requiring atypical tool use (e.g., using a knife to tighten a screw). The present study focused on a selection of atypical uses of everyday tools which might be in conflict with their typical use. Our objective was to study how tool function influences the selection of the relevant action. In Experiment 1, which involved visuomotor priming, two everyday tools (a knife and a screwdriver) and two neutral tools (two bars, with no strong functional affordance) were used as primes and targets. Participants had to use the target with the appropriate box (indicated by the color) that allowed to make an action. Longer initiation times were observed when the prime was an everyday tool, irrespective of the nature of the target. We therefore observed a conflict between functional and situational affordances. To investigate whether the priming effect is caused by the task-irrelevance of the prime, we asked the participants in Experiment 2 to perform an action associated with the prime. The results showed longer initiation times only when the prime and target were everyday tools, irrespective of their precise nature. This suggests that activation of the typical use of a tool might not be fully automatic but flexible depending on the situation.
topic visuomotor priming
tool use
tool function
atypical tool use
affordance
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01073/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinroche isthereacompetitionbetweenfunctionalandsituationalaffordancesduringactioninitiationwitheverydaytools
AT kevinroche isthereacompetitionbetweenfunctionalandsituationalaffordancesduringactioninitiationwitheverydaytools
AT hannachainay isthereacompetitionbetweenfunctionalandsituationalaffordancesduringactioninitiationwitheverydaytools
_version_ 1725304635486371840